← Back
CWE-664

42 CVEs • Abstraction: Pillar

Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime

The product does not maintain or incorrectly maintains control over a resource throughout its lifetime of creation, use, and release.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (42)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Linux
1Linux Kernel
Jul 23, 2026
May 23, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propa...Show more
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propagate the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG bit in skb_shinfo()->flags when moving frags from source to destination. __pskb_copy_fclone() defers the rest of the shinfo metadata to skb_copy_header() after copying frag descriptors, but that helper only carries over gso_{size,segs, type} and never touches skb_shinfo()->flags; skb_shift() moves frag descriptors directly and leaves flags untouched. As a result, the destination skb keeps a reference to the same externally-owned or page-cache-backed pages while reporting skb_has_shared_frag() as false. The mismatch is harmful in any in-place writer that uses skb_has_shared_frag() to decide whether shared pages must be detoured through skb_cow_data(). ESP input is one such writer (esp4.c, esp6.c), and a single nft 'dup to <local>' rule -- or any other nf_dup_ipv4() / xt_TEE caller -- is enough to land a pskb_copy()'d skb in esp_input() with the marker stripped, letting an unprivileged user write into the page cache of a root-owned read-only file via authencesn-ESN stray writes. Set SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG on the destination whenever frag descriptors were actually moved from the source. skb_copy() and skb_copy_expand() share skb_copy_header() too but linearize all paged data into freshly allocated head storage and emerge with nr_frags == 0, so skb_has_shared_frag() returns false on its own; they need no change. The same omission exists in skb_gro_receive() and skb_gro_receive_list(). The former moves the incoming skb's frag descriptors into the accumulator's last sub-skb via two paths (a direct frag-move loop and the head_frag + memcpy path); the latter chains the incoming skb whole onto p's frag_list. Downstream skb_segment() reads only skb_shinfo(p)->flags, and skb_segment_list() reuses each sub-skb's shinfo as the nskb -- both p and lp must carry the marker. The same omission also exists in tcp_clone_payload(), which builds an MTU probe skb by moving frag descriptors from skbs on sk_write_queue into a freshly allocated nskb. The helper falls into the same family and warrants the same fix for consistency; no TCP TX-side in-place writer is currently known to reach a user page through this gap, but a future consumer depending on the marker would regress silently. The same omission exists in skb_segment(): the per-iteration flag merge takes only head_skb's flag, and the inner switch that rebinds frag_skb to list_skb on head_skb-frags exhaustion does not fold the new frag_skb's flag into nskb. Fold frag_skb's flag at both sites so segments drawing frags from frag_list members carry the marker.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 14, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Object lifecycle issue in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.168 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medi...Show more
Object lifecycle issue in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.168 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 14, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Object lifecycle issue in WebShare in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 148.0.7778.168 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chro...Show more
Object lifecycle issue in WebShare in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 148.0.7778.168 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 3, 2025
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
OpenPLC Runtime v3 contains an input validation flaw in the /upload-program-action endpoint: the epoch_time field supplied during program uploads is not validated and can be crafted to induce corruption of the programs d...Show more
OpenPLC Runtime v3 contains an input validation flaw in the /upload-program-action endpoint: the epoch_time field supplied during program uploads is not validated and can be crafted to induce corruption of the programs database. After a successful malformed upload the runtime continues to operate until a restart; on restart the runtime can fail to start because of corrupted database entries, resulting in persistent denial of service requiring complete rebase of the product to recover. This vulnerability was remediated by commit 095ee09.Show less
1Huawei
1Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 6, 2025
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Iterator failure issue in the WantAgent module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause memory release failures.
1Huawei
1Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 6, 2025
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Iterator failure issue in the multi-mode input module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause iterator failures and affect availability.
1Huawei
1Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 6, 2025
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Iterator failure vulnerability in the card management module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect function stability.
1Huawei
1Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 6, 2025
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Iterator failure vulnerability in the card management module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect function stability.
1Apache
1Zeppelin
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 12, 2025
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The attacker can use the raft server protocol in an unauthenticated way. The attacker can see the server's resources, including directories and files. This issue affects Apache Zeppelin: from 0.10.1 up to 0.12.0. Users...Show more
The attacker can use the raft server protocol in an unauthenticated way. The attacker can see the server's resources, including directories and files. This issue affects Apache Zeppelin: from 0.10.1 up to 0.12.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.12.0, which fixes the issue by removing the Cluster Interpreter.Show less
1Juniper
2Junos
Junos Os Evolved
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2025
7.1 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker to cause a Deni...Show more
An Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). On devices with SRv6 (Segment Routing over IPv6) enabled, an attacker can send a malformed BGP UPDATE packet which will cause the rpd to crash and restart. Continued receipt of these UPDATE packets will cause a sustained DoS condition.  This issue affects iBGP and eBGP, and both IPv4 and IPv6 are affected by this vulnerability.This issue affects Junos OS:  * All versions before 21.2R3-S9,  * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S10,  * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5,  * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4,  * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S3,  * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S2,  * from 23.4 before 23.4R2; and Junos OS Evolved:  * All versions before 21.2R3-S9-EVO,  * from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S10-EVO,  * from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S5-EVO,  * from 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S4-EVO,  * from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S3-EVO, * from 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S2-EVO,  * from 23.4-EVO before 23.4R2-EVO.Show less
1Microsoft
1High Definition Audio Bus Driver
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 12, 2024
N/A· v4
5.0 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A mishandling of IRP requests vulnerability exists in the HDAudBus_DMA interface of Microsoft High Definition Audio Bus Driver 10.0.19041.3636 (WinBuild.160101.0800). A specially crafted application can issue multiple IR...Show more
A mishandling of IRP requests vulnerability exists in the HDAudBus_DMA interface of Microsoft High Definition Audio Bus Driver 10.0.19041.3636 (WinBuild.160101.0800). A specially crafted application can issue multiple IRP Complete requests which leads to a local denial-of-service. An attacker can execute malicious script/application to trigger this vulnerability.Show less
1Citrix
1Workspace
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 11, 2024
7.0 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Local privilege escalation allows a low-privileged user to gain SYSTEM privileges in Citrix Workspace app for Windows
1Dell
1Data Domain Operating System
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 26, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 contain an Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime vulnerability in an admin operation. A remote low privileged attacker...Show more
Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 8.0, LTS 7.13.1.0, LTS 7.10.1.30, LTS 7.7.5.40 contain an Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime vulnerability in an admin operation. A remote low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to temporary resource constraint of system application. Exploitation may lead to denial of service of the application.Show less
1Gnome
1Glade
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 19, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
plugins/gtk+/glade-gtk-box.c in GNOME Glade before 3.38.1 and 3.39.x before 3.40.0 mishandles widget rebuilding for GladeGtkBox, leading to a denial of service (application crash).
1Huawei
2Emui
Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 18, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Resource reuse vulnerability in the GPU module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
1Objectcomputing
1Micronaut
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Micronaut Framework is a modern, JVM-based, full stack Java framework designed for building modular, easily testable JVM applications with support for Java, Kotlin and the Groovy language. Enabled but unsecured managemen...Show more
Micronaut Framework is a modern, JVM-based, full stack Java framework designed for building modular, easily testable JVM applications with support for Java, Kotlin and the Groovy language. Enabled but unsecured management endpoints are susceptible to drive-by localhost attacks. While not typical of a production application, these attacks may have more impact on a development environment where such endpoints may be flipped on without much thought. A malicious/compromised website can make HTTP requests to `localhost`. Normally, such requests would trigger a CORS preflight check which would prevent the request; however, some requests are "simple" and do not require a preflight check. These endpoints, if enabled and not secured, are vulnerable to being triggered. Production environments typically disable unused endpoints and secure/restrict access to needed endpoints. A more likely victim is the developer in their local development host, who has enabled endpoints without security for the sake of easing development. This issue has been addressed in version 3.8.3. Users are advised to upgrade.Show less
1Linux Pam
1Linux Pam
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 6, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
linux-pam (aka Linux PAM) before 1.6.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (blocked login process) via mkfifo because the openat call (for protect_dir) lacks O_DIRECTORY.
1Dell
1Powerscale Onefs
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 5, 2023
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.6.0.x contains an improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability. A low privilege attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to los...Show more
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.6.0.x contains an improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability. A low privilege attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to loss of information, and information disclosure. Show less
1Dell
1Powerscale Onefs
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 5, 2023
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Dell PowerScale OneFS, 8.2.2.x through 9.6.0.x, contains an improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability. An unauthenticated network attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to...Show more
Dell PowerScale OneFS, 8.2.2.x through 9.6.0.x, contains an improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability. An unauthenticated network attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. Show less
1Dell
1Emc Powerscale Onefs
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 4, 2023
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x-9.4.x contain an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability. A malicious network user with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability in SMB, leading to a poten...Show more
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x-9.4.x contain an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability. A malicious network user with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability in SMB, leading to a potential denial of service. Show less