Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, POST /api/chat/completions and POST /api/v1/chat/completions in backend/open_webui/main.py copied a client-s...Show moreOpen WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, POST /api/chat/completions and POST /api/v1/chat/completions in backend/open_webui/main.py copied a client-supplied folder_id into a new chat without applying the folder write-access check used by the dedicated chat routes. An authenticated user who knew a shared folder identifier could inject an attacker-controlled chat into a folder where the user had read-only or no write access, causing the entry to appear to authorized folder readers. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.1.Show less |
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 until 0.11.1, the channel branch of chat_completion in backend/open_webui/main.py checked channel write access and channel...Show moreOpen WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 until 0.11.1, the channel branch of chat_completion in backend/open_webui/main.py checked channel write access and channel membership for a supplied message_id but did not verify that the calling user authored the targeted message. A channel member could use the chat completions endpoint to replace another member's message while preserving the victim as the stored author, altering the conversation record without gaining access to other channels. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.1.Show less |
Missing authorization in the Address Delete controller in Mageplaza GDPR for Magento 2 (mageplaza/module-gdpr) through 4.2.9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to delete any customer's saved address, and to erase al...Show moreMissing authorization in the Address Delete controller in Mageplaza GDPR for Magento 2 (mageplaza/module-gdpr) through 4.2.9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to delete any customer's saved address, and to erase all stored addresses by iterating the address id, via a GET request to /customer/address/delete/id/{id}. The controller extends the legacy Action class instead of AbstractAccount, so no authentication, ownership or form key check is enforced.Show less |
MantisBT is an open source bug tracker. Versions 2.28.3 and earlier contain a critical authentication bypass in the SOAP API's mci_check_login() function. Any user knowing any valid cookie_string can authenticate as any...Show moreMantisBT is an open source bug tracker. Versions 2.28.3 and earlier contain a critical authentication bypass in the SOAP API's mci_check_login() function. Any user knowing any valid cookie_string can authenticate as any other user (knowing their username), including the administrator, without knowing the target's password. The vulnerability is exploitable with zero prior access on default MantisBT installations because self-registration is enabled by default ($g_allow_signup = ON). A self-registered user can use their own cookie_string (readable from their browser's MANTIS_STRING_COOKIE cookie after login) to impersonate the administrator via the SOAP API. The REST API is NOT affected. The REST API's AuthMiddleware derives the username server-side from the API token or session cookie, so the username cannot be spoofed. The Web UI is NOT affected. The Web UI authenticates via PHP session cookies (PHPSESSID) and validates the MANTIS_STRING_COOKIE against the logged-in user through auth_is_cookie_valid(). The username is derived server-side from the cookie, not supplied by the client. Version 2.28.4 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available.Show less |
Cash Collect contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the Sage AR Automation API. Insufficient tenant-level authorization checks allow authenticated users to access administrative resources belonging to other...Show moreCash Collect contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the Sage AR Automation API. Insufficient tenant-level authorization checks allow authenticated users to access administrative resources belonging to other tenants by specifying a valid non predictable tenant identifier.Show less |
Snipe-IT versions >= 7.0.12 and <= 8.6.3 contain an authorization bypass in the Livewire importer component (App\Livewire\Importer, mounted at the imports.index route). The component only checked the broad 'import' abili...Show moreSnipe-IT versions >= 7.0.12 and <= 8.6.3 contain an authorization bypass in the Livewire importer component (App\Livewire\Importer, mounted at the imports.index route). The component only checked the broad 'import' ability at mount time, while its files() and activeFile() computed properties queried the imports table with no owner or company scope. As a result, any authenticated non-superuser holding the import permission could view every Import record on the instance (original filename, file_path, filesize, import_type and creation timestamp) and could invoke the selectFile($id) Livewire action with any auto-incrementing Import ID to load another user's record, exposing its stored preview data (header_row column headers and first_row, the first data row of the CSV). Because import CSVs commonly contain personal data, asset serial numbers and license keys, this discloses sensitive information; in Full Multiple Companies Support (FMCS) deployments the disclosure also crosses company/tenant boundaries. Impact is limited to preview data rather than the full CSV file, and superusers were unaffected. Fixed in version 8.7.0, which scopes non-superuser reads to imports owned by the caller.Show less |
snipe-it versions before 8.7.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in location print endpoints that fails to enforce per-model authorization checks. Authenticated attackers with location view permission can acc...Show moresnipe-it versions before 8.7.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in location print endpoints that fails to enforce per-model authorization checks. Authenticated attackers with location view permission can access printassigned and printallassigned endpoints to retrieve related users, assets, accessories, consumables, and components regardless of their individual model permissions.Show less |
Snipe-IT versions before 8.7.0 fail to properly scope asset acceptance report queries by company, allowing authenticated reports.view users to read pending acceptances across all companies. Attackers can access the unacc...Show moreSnipe-IT versions before 8.7.0 fail to properly scope asset acceptance report queries by company, allowing authenticated reports.view users to read pending acceptances across all companies. Attackers can access the unaccepted_assets report page or CSV export to disclose cross-company inventory details and assignee names without per-row access validation.Show less |
Siyuan before v3.8.2 fails to apply publish-access filtering to embedded blocks before rendering in the /api/export/preview and /api/lute/copyStdMarkdown endpoints. Attackers with reader access can retrieve the full rend...Show moreSiyuan before v3.8.2 fails to apply publish-access filtering to embedded blocks before rendering in the /api/export/preview and /api/lute/copyStdMarkdown endpoints. Attackers with reader access can retrieve the full rendered content of private, hidden, or publish-disabled blocks by accessing public documents containing embed queries that select those blocks.Show less |
The Sunshine Photo Cart WordPress plugin before 3.7 does not validate that a client-supplied price identifier belongs to the item being purchased when it is added to the cart, allowing unauthenticated users to buy items...Show moreThe Sunshine Photo Cart WordPress plugin before 3.7 does not validate that a client-supplied price identifier belongs to the item being purchased when it is added to the cart, allowing unauthenticated users to buy items at a lower price defined elsewhere on the site and complete an order at that price, resulting in financial loss for the site owner.Show less |
The WP Travel WordPress plugin before 12.0.2 does not properly verify that the requester owns the booking targeted by its bank-deposit slip submission, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who knows the target customer'...Show moreThe WP Travel WordPress plugin before 12.0.2 does not properly verify that the requester owns the booking targeted by its bank-deposit slip submission, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who knows the target customer's email address to change that customer's booking payment state and attach a file to it.Show less |
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. |
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. |
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. |
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply. |
Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{ha...Show moreSylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.Show less |
IBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus 3.27.1 through 3.27.5, and 3.33.1 through 3.33.3 could allow an attacker to bypass authorization by manipulating URL query parameters due to incorrect mapping of values to untrusted query...Show moreIBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus 3.27.1 through 3.27.5, and 3.33.1 through 3.33.3 could allow an attacker to bypass authorization by manipulating URL query parameters due to incorrect mapping of values to untrusted query string input.Show less |
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering over a network. |
The `vtoken-minting` and `slpx` pallets in Bifrost contain an improper authorization vulnerability in channel commission attribution. A signed account can supply an arbitrary registered `channel_id` when minting tokens w...Show moreThe `vtoken-minting` and `slpx` pallets in Bifrost contain an improper authorization vulnerability in channel commission attribution. A signed account can supply an arbitrary registered `channel_id` when minting tokens without verifying that the caller is authorized to mint on behalf of that channel. This allows an attacker to inflate a channel's recorded mint volume and cause protocol commission payments to be disproportionately distributed to that channel during commission settlement.Show less |