← Back
CWE-358

133 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard

The product does not implement or incorrectly implements one or more security-relevant checks as specified by the design of a standardized algorithm, protocol, or technique.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (133)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Cpanel
1Cpanel
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 1, 2019
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
cPanel before 55.9999.141 allows account-suspension bypass via ftp (SEC-105).
1Cpanel
1Cpanel
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 1, 2019
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
cPanel before 55.9999.141 allows attackers to bypass a Security Policy by faking static documents (SEC-92).
1Cpanel
1Cpanel
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 1, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
cPanel before 70.0.23 does not prevent e-mail account suspensions from being applied to unowned accounts (SEC-411).
2Heimdal Project
Samba
2Heimdal
Samba
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 31, 2019
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
6.0 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in samba's Heimdal KDC implementation, versions 4.8.x up to, excluding 4.8.12, 4.9.x up to, excluding 4.9.8 and 4.10.x up to, excluding 4.10.3, when used in AD DC mode. A man in the middle attacker could...Show more
A flaw was found in samba's Heimdal KDC implementation, versions 4.8.x up to, excluding 4.8.12, 4.9.x up to, excluding 4.9.8 and 4.10.x up to, excluding 4.10.3, when used in AD DC mode. A man in the middle attacker could use this flaw to intercept the request to the KDC and replace the user name (principal) in the request with any desired user name (principal) that exists in the KDC effectively obtaining a ticket for that principal.Show less
1Samsung
1Galaxy S9 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 3, 2019
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Samsung Galaxy S9 prior to 1.4.20.2. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exi...Show more
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Samsung Galaxy S9 prior to 1.4.20.2. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GameServiceReceiver update mechanism. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-7477.Show less
1Redhat
2Jboss Enterprise Application Platform
Wildfly
Jun 17, 2026
May 3, 2019
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
It was discovered that the ElytronManagedThread in Wildfly's Elytron subsystem in versions from 11 to 16 stores a SecurityIdentity to run the thread as. These threads do not necessarily terminate if the keep alive time h...Show more
It was discovered that the ElytronManagedThread in Wildfly's Elytron subsystem in versions from 11 to 16 stores a SecurityIdentity to run the thread as. These threads do not necessarily terminate if the keep alive time has not expired. This could allow a shared thread to use the wrong security identity when executing.Show less
1Powerdns
1Recursor
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 29, 2019
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor versions after 4.1.3 before 4.1.9 where Lua hooks are not properly applied to queries received over TCP in some specific combination of settings, possibly bypassing security p...Show more
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor versions after 4.1.3 before 4.1.9 where Lua hooks are not properly applied to queries received over TCP in some specific combination of settings, possibly bypassing security policies enforced using Lua.Show less
1Samba
1Samba
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 28, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Samba from version 4.9.0 and before version 4.9.3 that have AD DC configurations watching for bad passwords (to restrict brute forcing of passwords) in a window of more than 3 minutes may not watch for bad passwords at a...Show more
Samba from version 4.9.0 and before version 4.9.3 that have AD DC configurations watching for bad passwords (to restrict brute forcing of passwords) in a window of more than 3 minutes may not watch for bad passwords at all. The primary risk from this issue is with regards to domains that have been upgraded from Samba 4.8 and earlier. In these cases the manual testing done to confirm an organisation's password policies apply as expected may not have been re-done after the upgrade.Show less
1Opensuse
1Libzypp
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 31, 2018
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
The decoupled download and installation steps in libzypp before 17.5.0 could lead to a corrupted RPM being left in the cache, where a later call would not display the corrupted RPM warning and allow installation, a probl...Show more
The decoupled download and installation steps in libzypp before 17.5.0 could lead to a corrupted RPM being left in the cache, where a later call would not display the corrupted RPM warning and allow installation, a problem caused by malicious warnings only displayed during download.Show less
2Mozilla
Redhat
7Enterprise Linux Desktop
Enterprise Linux ServerEnterprise Linux Server Aus+4 more
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 1, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
It was found that Diffie Hellman Client key exchange handling in NSS 3.21.x was vulnerable to small subgroup confinement attack. An attacker could use this flaw to recover private keys by confining the client DH key to s...Show more
It was found that Diffie Hellman Client key exchange handling in NSS 3.21.x was vulnerable to small subgroup confinement attack. An attacker could use this flaw to recover private keys by confining the client DH key to small subgroup of the desired group.Show less
1Redhat
1Ansible
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 31, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in Ansible before version 2.2.0. The apt_key module does not properly verify key fingerprints, allowing remote adversary to create an OpenPGP key which matches the short key ID and inject this key instea...Show more
A flaw was found in Ansible before version 2.2.0. The apt_key module does not properly verify key fingerprints, allowing remote adversary to create an OpenPGP key which matches the short key ID and inject this key instead of the correct key.Show less
1Dell
4Idrac6 Firmware
Idrac7 FirmwareIdrac8 Firmware+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jul 2, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Dell EMC iDRAC6, versions prior to 2.91, iDRAC7/iDRAC8, versions prior to 2.60.60.60 and iDRAC9, versions prior to 3.21.21.21, contain a weak CGI session ID vulnerability. The sessions invoked via CGI binaries use 96-bit...Show more
Dell EMC iDRAC6, versions prior to 2.91, iDRAC7/iDRAC8, versions prior to 2.60.60.60 and iDRAC9, versions prior to 3.21.21.21, contain a weak CGI session ID vulnerability. The sessions invoked via CGI binaries use 96-bit numeric-only session ID values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to perform bruteforce session guessing attacks.Show less
1Cisco
1Digital Network Architecture Center
Nov 21, 2024
May 17, 2018
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
10.0 HIGH· v2
A vulnerability in the container management subsystem of Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and gain elevated privileges. This vulnera...Show more
A vulnerability in the container management subsystem of Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and gain elevated privileges. This vulnerability is due to an insecure default configuration of the Kubernetes container management subsystem within DNA Center. An attacker who has the ability to access the Kubernetes service port could execute commands with elevated privileges within provisioned containers. A successful exploit could result in a complete compromise of affected containers. This vulnerability affects Cisco DNA Center Software Releases 1.1.3 and prior. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi47253.Show less
1Jenkins
1Jenkins
Nov 21, 2024
May 15, 2018
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
In Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 low privilege users were able to act on administrative monitors due to them not being consistently protected by permission checks (SECURITY-371).
1Jenkins
1Jenkins
Nov 21, 2024
May 15, 2018
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
In Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 low privilege users were able to override JDK download credentials (SECURITY-392), resulting in future builds possibly failing to download a JDK.
2Jenkins
Redhat
2Jenkins
Openshift
Nov 21, 2024
May 8, 2018
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to an insufficient permission check for periodic processes (SECURITY-389). The URLs /workspaceCleanup and /fingerprintCleanup did not perform permission checks, allowing...Show more
Jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to an insufficient permission check for periodic processes (SECURITY-389). The URLs /workspaceCleanup and /fingerprintCleanup did not perform permission checks, allowing users with read access to Jenkins to trigger these background processes (that are otherwise performed daily), possibly causing additional load on Jenkins master and agents.Show less
2Oracle
Vmware
19Application Testing Suite
Big Data DiscoveryCommunications Converged Application Server+16 more
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 11, 2018
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the...Show more
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework.Show less
4Debian
OracleRedhat+1 more
28Application Testing Suite
Big Data DiscoveryCommunications Converged Application Server+25 more
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 6, 2018
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the...Show more
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.Show less
1Apache
1Tomcat
Nov 21, 2024
Jan 31, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
As part of the fix for bug 61201, the documentation for Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M22 to 9.0.1, 8.5.16 to 8.5.23, 8.0.45 to 8.0.47 and 7.0.79 to 7.0.82 included an updated description of the search algorithm used by the CGI Se...Show more
As part of the fix for bug 61201, the documentation for Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M22 to 9.0.1, 8.5.16 to 8.5.23, 8.0.45 to 8.0.47 and 7.0.79 to 7.0.82 included an updated description of the search algorithm used by the CGI Servlet to identify which script to execute. The update was not correct. As a result, some scripts may have failed to execute as expected and other scripts may have been executed unexpectedly. Note that the behaviour of the CGI servlet has remained unchanged in this regard. It is only the documentation of the behaviour that was wrong and has been corrected.Show less
1Thekelleys
1Dnsmasq
Nov 21, 2024
Jan 23, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in the implementation of DNSSEC in Dnsmasq up to and including 2.78. Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist...Show more
A vulnerability was found in the implementation of DNSSEC in Dnsmasq up to and including 2.78. Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist.Show less