← Back
CWE-354

210 CVEs • Abstraction: Base • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value

The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (210)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Oct 13, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Cocos AI is a confidential computing system for AI. In Cocos AI 0.8.2 and earlier, VerifTeeAttestation in the Intel TDX aTLS verifier receives an expected current-session value but does not apply it to TdQuoteBodyPolicy....Show more
Cocos AI is a confidential computing system for AI. In Cocos AI 0.8.2 and earlier, VerifTeeAttestation in the Intel TDX aTLS verifier receives an expected current-session value but does not apply it to TdQuoteBodyPolicy.ReportData before validating TDX QuoteV4 evidence. The verifier can consequently accept structurally valid evidence containing mismatched or reused REPORT_DATA for the current TLS session, causing the relying party to release application data or make a trust or authorization decision for an unrelated attestation context. This issue was fixed in Cocos AI 0.9.0 by removing the affected verifier path as part of the migration to post-handshake attestation.Show less
-
-
Sep 24, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
mport is the MidnightBSD Package Manager. Prior to 2.7.8, libmport/util.c did not make every truncated, corrupt, or failed zstd stream fatal in mport_decompress_zstd(), and libmport/fetch.c did not consistently propagate...Show more
mport is the MidnightBSD Package Manager. Prior to 2.7.8, libmport/util.c did not make every truncated, corrupt, or failed zstd stream fatal in mport_decompress_zstd(), and libmport/fetch.c did not consistently propagate those failures to index-fetch callers. A malicious or faulty mirror could supply compressed package index data that caused ZSTD_decompressStream() or an output write to fail while leaving partial index output available for later use, resulting in package-index integrity loss or denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 2.7.8.Show less
-
-
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
2.0 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
mport is the MidnightBSD Package Manager. Prior to 2.7.8, mport_verify_package() in libmport/verify.c could continue after MD5File() or SHA256_File() failed and compare an expected checksum with stale data in the hash bu...Show more
mport is the MidnightBSD Package Manager. Prior to 2.7.8, mport_verify_package() in libmport/verify.c could continue after MD5File() or SHA256_File() failed and compare an expected checksum with stale data in the hash buffer rather than a newly computed digest. An attacker able to influence an installed file or the conditions that make hashing fail could receive a misleading integrity result or hide a checksum failure. This issue is fixed in version 2.7.8.Show less
-
-
Sep 16, 2026
Sep 16, 2026
7.0 HIGH· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS configured, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a specially crafted IS-IS LSP PDU can cause the legitimate LSP to be unexpectedly purged from the IS-IS link-stat...Show more
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS configured, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a specially crafted IS-IS LSP PDU can cause the legitimate LSP to be unexpectedly purged from the IS-IS link-state database. This may result in traffic loss.Show less
-
-
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 15, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Netcore NR268 firmware version 1.7.121109 has an improper integrity verification flaw in mtd_write allowing forged firmware authenticity checks. Attackers can exploit put_file.cgi and check_image_uuid.c to bypass firmwar...Show more
Netcore NR268 firmware version 1.7.121109 has an improper integrity verification flaw in mtd_write allowing forged firmware authenticity checks. Attackers can exploit put_file.cgi and check_image_uuid.c to bypass firmware signature validation and load unauthorized firmware images.Show less
-
-
Sep 30, 2026
Sep 11, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
melange allows users to build apk packages using declarative pipelines. Apko prior to version 1.2.9, corresponding to melange prior to version 0.50.4, verified the control section hash (`.PKGINFO` etc.) against the signe...Show more
melange allows users to build apk packages using declarative pipelines. Apko prior to version 1.2.9, corresponding to melange prior to version 0.50.4, verified the control section hash (`.PKGINFO` etc.) against the signed `APKINDEX`, but never verified the data section hash (the actual package files that get installed). An attacker who could compromise a mirror, poison a cache, or MITM a package fetch could substitute arbitrary file contents while the control hash check still passed. Apko version 1.2.9 and melange version 0.50.4 contain a fix.Show less
1Microsoft
5Windows 11 23h2
Windows 11 24h2Windows 11 25h2+2 more
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 8, 2026
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper validation of integrity check value in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
-
-
Sep 2, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) decryption functionality of Cisco Secure Email could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to recover plain text from encrypted em...Show more
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) decryption functionality of Cisco Secure Email could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to recover plain text from encrypted email messages. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of message integrity. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using a machine-in-the-middle technique to intercept and modify traffic between email gateways. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain plaintext content from the encrypted communication.Show less
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 30, 2026
5.5 MEDIUM· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A vulnerability was identified in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. This affects an unknown function of the component SecurityModeComplete Handler. Such manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. The...Show more
A vulnerability was identified in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. This affects an unknown function of the component SecurityModeComplete Handler. Such manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue in Vanderbilt Industries, Acre Security SPC5300.000 Main Board v.3.14.1 allows a physically proximate attacker to cause a denial of service via spoofed TCP FIN packets without validating the sequence or acknowle...Show more
An issue in Vanderbilt Industries, Acre Security SPC5300.000 Main Board v.3.14.1 allows a physically proximate attacker to cause a denial of service via spoofed TCP FIN packets without validating the sequence or acknowledgment numbers.Show less
1Openssl
1Openssl
Sep 11, 2026
Aug 25, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty ciphertext can report success without verifying the supplied authentication tag when the operation is finalized by calling the EVP_Cipher() function....Show more
Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty ciphertext can report success without verifying the supplied authentication tag when the operation is finalized by calling the EVP_Cipher() function. Impact summary: Applications calling EVP_Cipher() on an empty ciphertext and expecting the call to check the AEAD tag may accept forged messages. CWE: CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value) Description: The EVP_Cipher() API call for AEAD ciphers behaves like a one shot encryption and decryption call. It also verifies the AEAD tag after the decryption operation. However for AES-OCB and ChaCha20-Poly1305 ciphers it skipped the AEAD tag verification when an empty ciphertext was passed to the function. The callers of this function might believe that a successful return indicates a valid AEAD tag for these ciphers, even when that has not truly been validated in this case. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as the affected algorithms are not FIPS approved and thus not implemented in the FIPS module.Show less
-
-
Oct 22, 2026
Aug 18, 2026
9.1 CRITICAL· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Kraken agents fail to verify peer-to-peer downloaded blobs against their requested SHA-256 digest before committing to the content-addressable cache, relying only on CRC32 checksums for piece validation. Attackers on the...Show more
Kraken agents fail to verify peer-to-peer downloaded blobs against their requested SHA-256 digest before committing to the content-addressable cache, relying only on CRC32 checksums for piece validation. Attackers on the agent-to-agent path or malicious peers can supply substituted content with forged CRC32 corrections that passes per-piece checks, poisoning the cache with attacker-chosen container image layers or manifests that are re-seeded and executed by other hosts.Show less
1Bouncycastle
3Bc Java
Bcpg FipsBouncy Castle For Java Lts
Aug 31, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
8.6 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcp...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).Show less
1Bouncycastle
2Bc Java
Bouncy Castle For Java Lts
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, IESEngine stream-mode MAC forgery via length-dependent KDF split. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.
1Bouncycastle
2Bc Java
Bouncy Castle For Java Lts
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, KCCMBlockCipher MAC does not bind nonce when AAD is absent (cross-nonce AEAD forgery). This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.
1Bouncycastle
3Bc Java
Bcpkix FipsBouncy Castle For Java Lts
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CMS AuthEnvelopedData fails to enforce tag-length on decryption. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before b...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CMS AuthEnvelopedData fails to enforce tag-length on decryption. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.12 (1.0.X series), 2.0.12 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.12 (2.1.X series).Show less
1Bouncycastle
3Bc Java
Bouncy Castle For Java LtsFips Java Api
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CCM-family modes write plaintext to caller buffer before tag check. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) befor...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CCM-family modes write plaintext to caller buffer before tag check. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series).Show less
1Bouncycastle
3Bc Java
Bcpkix FipsBouncy Castle For Java Lts
Aug 28, 2026
Aug 3, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CMS AuthenticatedData content not bound to MAC when authAttrs present. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) be...Show more
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CMS AuthenticatedData content not bound to MAC when authAttrs present. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.12 (1.0.X series), 2.0.12 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.12 (2.1.X series).Show less
1Nlnetlabs
1Unbound
Jul 24, 2026
Jul 22, 2026
N/A· v4
4.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as 'dats...Show more
In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as 'datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)' and passes it straight to 'query_dname_tolower()' without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause 'query_dname_tolower()' to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker 'env->scratch_buffer', past the end of that heap allocation if 'msg-buffer-size' has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk.Show less
-
-
Jul 21, 2026
Jul 21, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the m...Show more
Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag. This enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write. All TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected. We recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6Show less