← Back
CWE-352

9,638 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,638)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 3, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Mail Mint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the create_or_update_note function. This makes it po...Show more
The Mail Mint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the create_or_update_note function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or update contact notes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Due to missing sanitization and escaping this can lead to stored Cross-Site Scripting.Show less
1Polarlearn
1Polarlearn
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 2, 2026
2.3 LOW· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
PolarLearn is a free and open-source learning program. In 0-PRERELEASE-15 and earlier, the OAuth 2.0 implementation for GitHub and Google login providers is vulnerable to Login Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The appl...Show more
PolarLearn is a free and open-source learning program. In 0-PRERELEASE-15 and earlier, the OAuth 2.0 implementation for GitHub and Google login providers is vulnerable to Login Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application fails to implement and verify the state parameter during the authentication flow. This allows an attacker to pre-authenticate a session and trick a victim into logging into the attacker's account. Any data the victim then enters or academic progress they make is stored on the attacker's account, leading to data loss for the victim and information disclosure to the attacker.Show less
1Enalean
1Tuleap
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 2, 2026
N/A· v4
4.6 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite for management of software development and collaboration. Tuleap is missing CSRF protection in the Overview inconsistent items. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims int...Show more
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite for management of software development and collaboration. Tuleap is missing CSRF protection in the Overview inconsistent items. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into repairing inconsistent items (creating artifact links from the release). This vulnerability is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition 17.0.99.1768924735 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.2-5, 17.1-6, and 17.0-9.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 2, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Five Star Restaurant Reservations WordPress plugin before 2.7.9 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting booking...Show more
The Five Star Restaurant Reservations WordPress plugin before 2.7.9 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting bookings via CSRF attacks.Show less
1Oretnom23
1Medical Certificate Generator App
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 2, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Medical Certificate Generator App 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Th...Show more
A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Medical Certificate Generator App 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 31, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Popup Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.1. This is due to a flawed nonce implementation in the 'publish_unpublish_popupbox' function that v...Show more
The Popup Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.1. This is due to a flawed nonce implementation in the 'publish_unpublish_popupbox' function that verifies a self-created nonce rather than one submitted in the request. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the publish status of popups via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.Show less
1Naviwebs
1Navigate Cms
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arb...Show more
Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Sistem Informasi Pengumuman Kelulusan Online 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized admin users through the tambahuser.php endpoint. Attackers can craft a malici...Show more
Sistem Informasi Pengumuman Kelulusan Online 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized admin users through the tambahuser.php endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit admin credentials and create new administrative accounts without the victim's consent.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Sickbeard alpha contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to disable authentication by submitting crafted configuration parameters. Attackers can trick users into submitting a malicious fo...Show more
Sickbeard alpha contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to disable authentication by submitting crafted configuration parameters. Attackers can trick users into submitting a malicious form that clears web username and password, effectively removing authentication protection.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 29, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger un...Show more
birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters.Show less
1Salihciftci
1Liman
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 29, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Liman 0.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user account settings without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms to change user passwords...Show more
Liman 0.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user account settings without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms to change user passwords or modify account information by tricking logged-in users into submitting unauthorized requests.Show less
1Acquia
1Acquia Content Hub
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia Content Hub allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia Content Hub: from 0.0.0 before 3.6.4, from 3.7.0 before 3.7.3.
1Innoraft
1Login Time Restriction
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Login Time Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Login Time Restriction: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes...Show more
The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary email addresses to the spam allowlist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 2026.1.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes i...Show more
The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the WP Login URL via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes...Show more
The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including donation addresses and display configurations, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible...Show more
The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker...Show more
Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to rename commands via '/rename_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter.Show less