← Back
CWE-352

9,883 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,883)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Lfnovo
1Open Notebook
Jun 17, 2026
May 7, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An improper input validation, together with an overly permissive default CORS configuration in Open Notebook v1.8.1 allows remote attacker to trick a legitimate user to alter or delete arbitrary database entries via spec...Show more
An improper input validation, together with an overly permissive default CORS configuration in Open Notebook v1.8.1 allows remote attacker to trick a legitimate user to alter or delete arbitrary database entries via specially crafted malicious URL. Depending on the deployment, data exfiltration is also possible.Show less
-
-
Oct 26, 2026
May 7, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginUs.Net BEAR allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects BEAR: from n/a through 1.1.5.
-
-
Oct 14, 2026
May 7, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 2.5.3.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 7, 2026
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with...Show more
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the createBundle method in `csettings.cfc` does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for site bundle creation requests. An at...Show more
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the createBundle method in `csettings.cfc` does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for site bundle creation requests. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage or link that, when visited by a logged-in administrator, triggers the silent creation of a comprehensive site bundle. This bundle is saved to a predictable, publicly accessible web directory. An unauthenticated attacker can then retrieve the bundle and obtain site content, user account data, password hashes, form submissions, email lists, plugins, and configuration data. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, remove unexpected bundle files from public directories, restrict access to the affected endpoint, and limit exposure of administrative sessions.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the `cTrash.restore` function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can tri...Show more
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the `cTrash.restore` function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that restores deleted items from the trash and places them at an attacker-controlled location in the site structure through the parentid parameter. This can restore previously deleted malicious or outdated content, expose sensitive documents by moving them into publicly accessible locations, and disrupt site structure or content integrity. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and regularly empty the trash to reduce the amount of content available for unauthorized restoration.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.empty function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens for trash management requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in...Show more
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.empty function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens for trash management requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that empties the trash and permanently deletes all deleted content. This can cause irreversible data loss and disrupt recovery of content intended for restoration. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and maintain current database backups to recover from unauthorized deletion.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attac...Show more
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that adds, modifies, or deletes user address records, including email addresses and phone numbers. This can be used to alter contact information, redirect organizational communications, and corrupt address data in the user directory. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, or deploy filtering rules to block forged requests to the affected endpointShow less
1Google
1Chrome
Oct 26, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium...Show more
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less
1Hcltech
1Bigfix Service Management
Oct 7, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
5.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 5, 2026
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Publish 2 Ping.fm plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the '/wp-admin/options-general.php...Show more
The Publish 2 Ping.fm plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the '/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=admin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 5, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible fo...Show more
The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 5, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This...Show more
The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged request that modifies the plugin's configuration options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Goshs
1Goshs
Oct 26, 2026
May 4, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to version 2.0.2, the PUT upload handler (httpserver/updown.go) lacks the CSRF token validation that was added to the POST upload handler during the CVE-2026-40883 fix. Co...Show more
goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to version 2.0.2, the PUT upload handler (httpserver/updown.go) lacks the CSRF token validation that was added to the POST upload handler during the CVE-2026-40883 fix. Combined with the unconditional Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on the OPTIONS preflight handler (httpserver/server.go), any website can write arbitrary files to a goshs instance through the victim's browser — bypassing network isolation (e.g. localhost, internal network). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.2.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 1, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the 'add_plugins_page' and 'add_themes_page' func...Show more
The WP Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the 'add_plugins_page' and 'add_themes_page' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite arbitrary plugin and theme PHP files with attacker-controlled code via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 1, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' fu...Show more
The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle plugin modules on or off via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jul 5, 2026
Apr 30, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the U-SPEED N300 Rounter V1.0.0. The device does not implement CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Ori...Show more
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the U-SPEED N300 Rounter V1.0.0. The device does not implement CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.Show less
1Dbitnet
1Dbit N300 T1 Pro Firmware
Jul 5, 2026
Apr 30, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF t...Show more
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints such as /api/setWlan. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.Show less
-
-
Apr 30, 2026
Apr 29, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting a cross-site request forger...Show more
VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting a cross-site request forgery flaw in the web management interface. Attackers with valid credentials can leverage the CSRF vulnerability to inject and execute system commands through the Tools > System > Shell interface, gaining root-level access to the device.Show less
-
-
Apr 30, 2026
Apr 29, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Merge PACS 7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms targeting the merge-viewer endpoint. Attackers can submit POST req...Show more
Merge PACS 7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms targeting the merge-viewer endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests to /servlet/actions/merge-viewer/summary with login credentials to hijack user sessions and gain unauthorized access to the PACS system.Show less