← Back
CWE-352

9,308 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,308)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Upcoming for Calendly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This m...Show more
The Upcoming for Calendly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Calendly API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it...Show more
The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings including the theme configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Animated Pixel Marquee Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the 'marquee' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the...Show more
The Animated Pixel Marquee Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the 'marquee' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the marquee deletion function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary marquees via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Purchase and Expense Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'sup_pt_handle_deletion' funct...Show more
The Purchase and Expense Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'sup_pt_handle_deletion' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary purchase records via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Foxtool All-in-One: Contact chat button, Custom login, Media optimize images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or inc...Show more
The Foxtool All-in-One: Contact chat button, Custom login, Media optimize images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the foxtool_login_google() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to establish an OAuth Connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Rabbit Hole plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's reset functionality. This m...Show more
The Rabbit Hole plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's reset functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability is exacerbated by the fact that the reset operation is performed via a GET request, making exploitation trivial via image tags or hyperlinks.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 12, 2025
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The IMAQ Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the URL structure settings update functionality. This...Show more
The IMAQ Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the URL structure settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's URL structure settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Easyimages2.0 Project
1Easyimages2.0
Dec 15, 2025
Dec 11, 2025
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /admin/admin.inc.php component of EasyImages 2.0 v2.8.6 and below allows attackers to escalate privileges to Administrator via user interaction with a malicious web page.
-
-
Dec 12, 2025
Dec 11, 2025
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious...Show more
TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user on a wiki with the extension enabled, would trigger unintended authenticated actions through the victim's browser. Due to the lack of token validation, an attacker can delete or track progress against tables. This issue is patched in version 1.2.1 of the extension.Show less
1Medivision
1Medivision Digital Signage Firmware
Dec 30, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
8.6 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious...Show more
UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to the /query/user/itSet endpoint to add a new admin user with elevated privileges.Show less
1All Dynamics
1Digital Signage System
Jan 15, 2026
Dec 10, 2025
8.6 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web pa...Show more
All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to create a new user with global administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.Show less
1Spinetix
1Fusion Digital Signage
Dec 17, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious we...Show more
SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.Show less
1Fit2cloud
11panel
Dec 23, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens...Show more
1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a panel-name change request; if a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows a remote attacker to change the victim’s panel name to an arbitrary value without consent.Show less
1Fit2cloud
11panel
Dec 23, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
7.0 HIGH· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Refe...Show more
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a port-change request; when a victim visits it while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the port on which the 1Panel web service listens, causing loss of access on the original port and resulting in service disruption or denial of service, and may unintentionally expose the service on an attacker-chosen port.Show less
1Jenkins
1Jenkins
Dec 17, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins 2.540 and earlier, LTS 2.528.2 and earlier allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker's account.
1Fit2cloud
11panel
Dec 23, 2025
Dec 10, 2025
7.0 HIGH· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Username functionality available from the settings panel (/settings/panel). The endpoint does not implement CSRF pr...Show more
1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Username functionality available from the settings panel (/settings/panel). The endpoint does not implement CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a username-change request; when a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the victim’s 1Panel username without consent. After the change, the victim is logged out and unable to log in with the previous username, resulting in account lockout and denial of service.Show less
1Selea
12Carplateserver
Izero Box Full FirmwareIzero Column Entry/8 Firmware+9 more
Feb 24, 2026
Dec 9, 2025
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form...Show more
Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to add a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.Show less
1Stvs
1Provision
Feb 17, 2026
Dec 9, 2025
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web...Show more
STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web sites to trigger the forge request, allowing them to create new admin users.Show less
1Openbmcs
1Openbmcs
Dec 19, 2025
Dec 9, 2025
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
OpenBMCS 2.4 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting the sendFeedback.php endpoint. Attackers can submit malicious requests to trigger unintende...Show more
OpenBMCS 2.4 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting the sendFeedback.php endpoint. Attackers can submit malicious requests to trigger unintended actions, such as sending emails or modifying system settings.Show less
1Allskyteam
1Allsky
Dec 16, 2025
Dec 9, 2025
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AllskyTeam AllSky v2024.12.06_06 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function handle_interface_POST_and_status.