The Remove Footer Credit WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, which could allow attacker to make logged in admins change them and lead to Stored XSS issue as well due...Show moreThe Remove Footer Credit WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, which could allow attacker to make logged in admins change them and lead to Stored XSS issue as well due to the lack of sanitisationShow less |
An issue in the Login page of Magnolia CMS v6.2.3 and below allows attackers to exploit both an Open Redirect vulnerability and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in order to brute force and exfiltrate users' credentials. |
The QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit...Show moreThe QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit module (which comes with the Standard profile) is installed. Removing the "access in-place editing" permission from untrusted users will not fully mitigate the vulnerability.Show less |
The Entity Embed module provides a filter to allow embedding entities in content fields. In certain circumstances, the filter could allow an unprivileged user to inject HTML into a page when it is accessed by a trusted u...Show moreThe Entity Embed module provides a filter to allow embedding entities in content fields. In certain circumstances, the filter could allow an unprivileged user to inject HTML into a page when it is accessed by a trusted user with permission to embed entities. In some cases, this could lead to cross-site scripting.Show less |
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could induce users to perform unintended actions, leading to the override of the system�s configurations when an attacker persuades a user to visit a...Show moreA CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could induce users to perform unintended actions, leading to the override of the system�s configurations when an attacker persuades a user to visit a rogue website. Affected Product: spaceLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior), Wiser for KNX (formerly homeLYnk) (V2.6.2 and prior), fellerLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior)Show less |
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists that could cause a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the product when conducting cross-domain attacks based on same-origin policy or cross-site request for...Show moreA CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists that could cause a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the product when conducting cross-domain attacks based on same-origin policy or cross-site request forgery protections bypass. Affected Product: EcoStruxure EV Charging Expert (formerly known as EVlink Load Management System): (HMIBSCEA53D1EDB, HMIBSCEA53D1EDS, HMIBSCEA53D1EDM, HMIBSCEA53D1EDL, HMIBSCEA53D1ESS, HMIBSCEA53D1ESM, HMIBSCEA53D1EML) (All Versions prior to SP8 (Version 01) V4.0.0.13)Show less |
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users. |
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Affected versions are subject to a cross site request forgery vulnerability which allows attackers to elevate their privileges by mounting cross-origin...Show moreGrafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Affected versions are subject to a cross site request forgery vulnerability which allows attackers to elevate their privileges by mounting cross-origin attacks against authenticated high-privilege Grafana users (for example, Editors or Admins). An attacker can exploit this vulnerability for privilege escalation by tricking an authenticated user into inviting the attacker as a new user with high privileges. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible. There are no known workarounds for this issue.Show less |
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests. |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Packagist microweber/microweber prior to 1.2.11. |
The IP2Location Country Blocker WordPress plugin before 2.26.6 does not have CSRF check in the ip2location_country_blocker_save_rules AJAX action, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin block arbitrary country, or...Show moreThe IP2Location Country Blocker WordPress plugin before 2.26.6 does not have CSRF check in the ip2location_country_blocker_save_rules AJAX action, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin block arbitrary country, or block all of them at once, preventing users from accessing the frontend.Show less |
The IP2Location Country Blocker WordPress plugin before 2.26.5 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in the ip2location_country_blocker_save_rules AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber t...Show moreThe IP2Location Country Blocker WordPress plugin before 2.26.5 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in the ip2location_country_blocker_save_rules AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and block arbitrary country, or block all of them at once, preventing users from accessing the frontend.Show less |
The Ultimate Product Catalog WordPress plugin before 5.0.26 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call them and add arbitrary p...Show moreThe Ultimate Product Catalog WordPress plugin before 5.0.26 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call them and add arbitrary products, or change the plugin's settings for exampleShow less |
The RVM WordPress plugin before 6.4.2 does not have proper authorisation, CSRF checks and validation of the rvm_upload_regions_file_path parameter in the rvm_import_regions AJAX action, allowing any authenticated user, s...Show moreThe RVM WordPress plugin before 6.4.2 does not have proper authorisation, CSRF checks and validation of the rvm_upload_regions_file_path parameter in the rvm_import_regions AJAX action, allowing any authenticated user, such as subscriber, to read arbitrary files on the web serverShow less |
The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in u...Show moreThe SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in user having access to the ticket lists dashboard set an arbitrary filter (stored in their cookies) with an XSS payload in it.Show less |
The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CRSF check in its wpsc_tickets AJAX action, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin call it and delete arbitrary tickets via the set_delete_perma...Show moreThe SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CRSF check in its wpsc_tickets AJAX action, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin call it and delete arbitrary tickets via the set_delete_permanently_bulk_ticket setting_action.Show less |
### Impact It's possible to know if a user has or not an account in a wiki related to an email address, and which username(s) is actually tied to that email by forging a request to the Forgot username page. Note that sin...Show more### Impact It's possible to know if a user has or not an account in a wiki related to an email address, and which username(s) is actually tied to that email by forging a request to the Forgot username page. Note that since this page does not have a CSRF check it's quite easy to perform a lot of those requests. ### Patches This issue has been patched in XWiki 12.10.5 and 13.2RC1. Two different patches are provided: - a first one to fix the CSRF problem - a more complex one that now relies on sending an email for the Forgot username process. ### Workarounds It's possible to fix the problem without uprading by editing the ForgotUsername page in version below 13.x, to use the following code: https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/69548c0320cbd772540cf4668743e69f879812cf/xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-administration/xwiki-platform-administration-ui/src/main/resources/XWiki/ForgotUsername.xml#L39-L123 In version after 13.x it's also possible to edit manually the forgotusername.vm file, but it's really encouraged to upgrade the version here. ### References * https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-18384 * https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-18408 ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [Jira XWiki](https://jira.xwiki.org) * Email us at [security ML](mailto:security@xwiki.org)Show less |
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists on the web server used, that could cause a leak of sensitive data or unauthorized actions on the web server during the time the user is logged in. Affecte...Show moreA CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists on the web server used, that could cause a leak of sensitive data or unauthorized actions on the web server during the time the user is logged in. Affected Products: Modicon M340 CPUs: BMXP34 (All Versions), Modicon Quantum CPUs with integrated Ethernet (Copro): 140CPU65 (All Versions), Modicon Premium CPUs with integrated Ethernet (Copro): TSXP57 (All Versions), Modicon M340 ethernet modules: (BMXNOC0401, BMXNOE01, BMXNOR0200H) (All Versions), Modicon Quantum and Premium factory cast communication modules: (140NOE77111, 140NOC78*00, TSXETY5103, TSXETY4103) (All Versions)Show less |
A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in Filebrowser < 2.18.0 that allows attackers to create a backdoor user with admin privilege and get access to the filesystem via a malicious HTML webpage that is sent to...Show moreA Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in Filebrowser < 2.18.0 that allows attackers to create a backdoor user with admin privilege and get access to the filesystem via a malicious HTML webpage that is sent to the victim. An admin can run commands using the FileBrowser and hence it leads to RCE.Show less |
A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Backdrop CMS 1.20, which allows Remote Attackers to gain Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the Hosting Webserver via uploading a maliciously add-on with crafted PH...Show moreA Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Backdrop CMS 1.20, which allows Remote Attackers to gain Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the Hosting Webserver via uploading a maliciously add-on with crafted PHP file. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because the attack requires a session cookie of a high-privileged authenticated user who is entitled to install arbitrary add-onsShow less |