← Back
CWE-352

9,676 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,676)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Tenda
1Ac6 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 2, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Tenda AC6V1.0 V15.03.05.19 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet.
1Ibm
3Db2 On Cloud Pak For Data
Db2 Warehouse On Cloud Pak For DataDb2u
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 1, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237212...Show more
IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237212.Show less
1Thinkcmf
1Thinkcmf
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 1, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
ThinkCMF version 6.0.7 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows a Super Administrator user to be injected into administrative users.
1Adrotate Banner Manager Project
1Adrotate Banner Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 30, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in AdRotate Banner Manager Plugin <= 5.9 on WordPress.
1Perfsonar
1Perfsonar
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 30, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
perfSONAR v4.x <= v4.4.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is triggered when an attacker injects crafted input into the Search function.
1Tipsandtricks Hq
1Wp Affiliate Platform
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 29, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Affiliate Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on various functions including the...Show more
The WP Affiliate Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on various functions including the affiliates_menu method. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete affiliate records, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Muffingroup
1Becustom
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 29, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Becustom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.5.2. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving the plugin's settings. This makes it possible f...Show more
The Becustom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.5.2. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving the plugin's settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings like betheme_url_slug, replaced_theme_author, and betheme_label to name a few, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Bosscms
1Bosscms
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 28, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Bosscms v2.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Add function under the Administrator List module.
1Freeamigos
1Manage Notification E Mails
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 28, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Virgial Berveling's Manage Notification E-mails plugin <= 1.8.2 on WordPress.
1Prasathmani
1Tiny File Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 25, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Tiny File Manager version 2.4.8 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to persuade users to perform unintended actions within the application. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to CSRF.
1Stock Management System Project
1Stock Management System
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 24, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability was found in rickxy Stock Management System and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file us_transac.php?action=add. The manipulation leads to cross-site request fo...Show more
A vulnerability was found in rickxy Stock Management System and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file us_transac.php?action=add. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-214331.Show less
1Jizhicms
1Jizhicms
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in JIZHI CMS 1.9.4. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an admin account via index, /admin.php/Admin/adminadd.html
1Xwiki
1Xwiki
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
XWiki Platform is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) that may allow attackers to delete or rename tags without needing any confirmation. The problem has been patched in XWiki 13.10.7, 14.4.1 and 14.5RC1. Wor...Show more
XWiki Platform is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) that may allow attackers to delete or rename tags without needing any confirmation. The problem has been patched in XWiki 13.10.7, 14.4.1 and 14.5RC1. Workarounds: It's possible to patch existing instances directly by editing the page Main.Tags and add this kind of check, in the code for renaming and for deleting: ``` #if (!$services.csrf.isTokenValid($request.get('form_token'))) #set ($discard = $response.sendError(401, "Wrong CSRF token")) #end ```Show less
1Tailscale
1Tailscale
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale client allows a malicious website to access the peer API, which can then be used to access Tailscale environment variables. In the Tailscale client, the peer API was vulnerable...Show more
A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale client allows a malicious website to access the peer API, which can then be used to access Tailscale environment variables. In the Tailscale client, the peer API was vulnerable to DNS rebinding. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS for the peer API to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then making peer API requests in the client, including accessing the node’s Tailscale environment variables. An attacker with access to the peer API on a node could use that access to read the node’s environment variables, including any credentials or secrets stored in environment variables. This may include Tailscale authentication keys, which could then be used to add new nodes to the user’s tailnet. The peer API access could also be used to learn of other nodes in the tailnet or send files via Taildrop. All Tailscale clients prior to version v1.32.3 are affected. Upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue.Show less
1Tailscale
1Tailscale
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon `tailscaled`, which can then be used to remotely execute code. In the Tailscale Windows client, th...Show more
A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon `tailscaled`, which can then be used to remotely execute code. In the Tailscale Windows client, the local API was bound to a local TCP socket, and communicated with the Windows client GUI in cleartext with no Host header verification. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then make local API requests in the client, including changing the coordination server to an attacker-controlled coordination server. An attacker-controlled coordination server can send malicious URL responses to the client, including pushing executables or installing an SMB share. These allow the attacker to remotely execute code on the node. All Windows clients prior to version v.1.32.3 are affected. If you are running Tailscale on Windows, upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Moodle
2Fedora
Moodle
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability was found in Moodle which exists due to insufficient validation of the HTTP request origin in course redirect URL. A user's CSRF token was unnecessarily included in the URL when being redirected to a cour...Show more
A vulnerability was found in Moodle which exists due to insufficient validation of the HTTP request origin in course redirect URL. A user's CSRF token was unnecessarily included in the URL when being redirected to a course they have just restored. A remote attacker can trick the victim to visit a specially crafted web page and perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the victim on the vulnerable website. This flaw allows an attacker to perform cross-site request forgery attacks.Show less
1Optilinknetwork
1Op Xt71000n Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to Reset ONU to Factory...Show more
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to Reset ONU to Factory Default through ' /mgm_dev_reset.asp.' Resetting to default leads to Escalation of Privileges by logging-in with default credentials.Show less
1Optilinknetwork
1Op Xt71000n Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in Optilink OP-XT71000N Hardware version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to change the Password f...Show more
A vulnerability in Optilink OP-XT71000N Hardware version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to change the Password for "WLAN SSID" through "wlwpa.asp".Show less
1Optilinknetwork
1Op Xt71000n Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to cause a Denial of Se...Show more
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to cause a Denial of Service by Rebooting the router through " /mgm_dev_reboot.asp."Show less
1Optilinknetwork
1Op Xt71000n Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2022
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to "Enable or Disable P...Show more
A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to "Enable or Disable Ports" and to "Change port number" through " /rmtacc.asp ".Show less