Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Groundhogg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.7.9.8. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'enable_safe_mode' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable safe mode, which disables all other plugins, via a forged request if they can successfully trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. A warning message about safe mode is displayed to the admin, which can be easily disabled.Show less

The Multiple Page Generator Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to time-based SQL Injection via the orderby and order parameters in versions up to, and including, 3.3.17 due to missing nonce verification on the projects_list function and insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries leading to resource exhaustion via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Version 3.3.18 addresses the SQL Injection, which drastically reduced the severity.Show less

The Contact Form by Supsystic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.24. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute AJAX actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins AppSpider Plugin 1.0.15 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL and send an HTTP POST request with a JSON payload consisting of attacker-specified credentials.Show less

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP POST request with JSON body containing attacker-specified content, to miniOrange's API for sending emails.Show less

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.0.2 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP request to an attacker-specified URL and parse the response as XML, or parse a local file on the Jenkins controller as XML.Show less

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Azure VM Agents Plugin 852.v8d35f0960a_43 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified Azure Cloud server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method.Show less

The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting Holidays, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary holidays via a CSRF attackShow less

A Cross-site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) vulnerability found in UniFi OS 2.5 and earlier allows a malicious actor to access certain confidential information by persuading a UniFi OS user to visit a malicious webpage.Affected Products:Cloud Key Gen2Cloud Key Gen2 PlusUNVRUNVR ProfessionalUDMUDM ProfessionalUDM SEUDRMitigation:Update affected products to UniFi OS 3.0.13 or later.Show less

A cross site request forgery vulnerability exists in Rockwell Automation's FactoryTalk Vantagepoint. This vulnerability can be exploited in two ways. If an attacker sends a malicious link to a computer that is on the same domain as the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server and a user clicks the link, the attacker could impersonate the legitimate user and send requests to the affected product.  Additionally, if an attacker sends an untrusted link to a computer that is not on the same domain as the server and a user opens the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint website, enters credentials for the FactoryTalk Vantagepoint server, and clicks on the malicious link a cross site request forgery attack would be successful as well. Show less