Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

In AdGuardHome, versions v0.95 through v0.108.0-b.13 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), in the custom filtering rules functionality. An attacker can persuade an authorized user to follow a malicious link, resulting in deleting/modifying the custom filtering rules.Show less

A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in the “Import Files“ functionality of the “Operation” web application due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. A remote unauthenticated attacker can upload and enable permanent arbitrary JavaScript code into the device just by convincing a victim to visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application.Show less

A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in endpoints of the “Operation” web application that interpret and execute Axon language queries, due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. By convincing a victim to click on a malicious link or visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application, a remote unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary Axon queries against the device.Show less

The Woo Billingo Plus WordPress plugin before 4.4.5.4, Integration for Billingo & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.0.4, Integration for Szamlazz.hu & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.2.7 are lacking CSRF checks in various AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in Shop Managers and above perform unwanted actions, such as deactivate the plugin's licenseShow less

The Zephyr Project Manager WordPress plugin before 3.2.55 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF in all its AJAX actions, allowing unauthenticated users to call them either directly or via CSRF attacks. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also allow them to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against logged in admins.Show less

### Impact In a CSRF attack, an innocent end user is tricked by an attacker into submitting a web request that they did not intend. This may cause actions to be performed on the website that can include inadvertent client or server data leakage, change of session state, or manipulation of an end user's account. ### Patch Upgrade to v2022.09.10 to patch this vulnerability. ### Workarounds Rebuild and redeploy the Orchest `auth-server` with this commit: https://github.com/orchest/orchest/commit/c2587a963cca742c4a2503bce4cfb4161bf64c2d ### References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_request_forgery https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/352.html ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in https://github.com/orchest/orchest * Email us at rick@orchest.ioShow less

BigProf Online Invoicing System before 3.0 offers a functionality that allows an administrator to move the records of members across groups. The applicable endpoint (admin/pageTransferOwnership.php) lacks CSRF protection, resulting in an attacker being able to escalate their privileges to Administrator and effectively taking over the application.Show less

The OAuth client Single Sign On WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 does not have authorisation and CSRF when updating its settings, which could allow unauthenticated attackers to update them and change the OAuth endpoints to ones they controls, allowing them to then be authenticated as admin if they know the correct email addressShow less

The Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet WordPress plugin through 1.6.0 does not have any CSRF check when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issuesShow less