← Back
CWE-352

9,308 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,308)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Feb 4, 2026
Jan 29, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger un...Show more
birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters.Show less
1Salihciftci
1Liman
Feb 17, 2026
Jan 29, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Liman 0.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user account settings without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms to change user passwords...Show more
Liman 0.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user account settings without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms to change user passwords or modify account information by tricking logged-in users into submitting unauthorized requests.Show less
1Acquia
1Acquia Content Hub
Feb 6, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia Content Hub allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia Content Hub: from 0.0.0 before 3.6.4, from 3.7.0 before 3.7.3.
1Innoraft
1Login Time Restriction
Feb 19, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Login Time Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Login Time Restriction: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3.
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes...Show more
The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary email addresses to the spam allowlist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 2026.1.Show less
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes i...Show more
The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the WP Login URL via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes...Show more
The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including donation addresses and display configurations, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible...Show more
The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker...Show more
Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Feb 10, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Feb 10, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to rename commands via '/rename_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Feb 10, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete commands individually via '/delete_command?sid=', using the 'cid' parameter.Show less
1Flexense
2Diskpulse
Syncbreeze
Feb 10, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the applicat...Show more
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to change a user's password or create users via '/setup_login?sid=', affecting the 'username', 'password', and 'cpassword' parameters.Show less
-
-
Jan 29, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Recooty – Job Widget (Old Dashboard) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the recooty_save_maybe() f...Show more
The Recooty – Job Widget (Old Dashboard) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the recooty_save_maybe() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the recooty_key option and inject malicious content into iframe src attributes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Mozilla
1Thunderbird
Apr 13, 2026
Jan 28, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
When a user explicitly requested Thunderbird to decrypt an inline OpenPGP message that was embedded in a text section of an email that was formatted and styled with HTML and CSS, then the decrypted contents were rendered...Show more
When a user explicitly requested Thunderbird to decrypt an inline OpenPGP message that was embedded in a text section of an email that was formatted and styled with HTML and CSS, then the decrypted contents were rendered in a context in which the CSS styles from the outer messages were active. If the user had additionally allowed loading of the remote content referenced by the outer email message, and the email was crafted by the sender using a combination of CSS rules and fonts and animations, then it was possible to extract the secret contents of the email. This vulnerability was fixed in Thunderbird 147.0.1 and Thunderbird 140.7.1.Show less
1Nimbletech
1Ezcast Pro Dongle Ii Firmware
Feb 5, 2026
Jan 27, 2026
6.8 MEDIUM· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Admin UI of EZCast Pro II version 1.17478.146 allows attackers to bypass authorization checks and gain full access to the admin UI
1Linuxfoundation
1Sigstore Python
Mar 2, 2026
Jan 26, 2026
N/A· v4
5.0 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Prior to version 4.2.0, the sigstore-python OAuth authentication flow is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery. `_OAuthSession` creat...Show more
sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Prior to version 4.2.0, the sigstore-python OAuth authentication flow is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery. `_OAuthSession` creates a unique "state" and sends it as a parameter in the authentication request but the "state" in the server response seems not not be cross-checked with this value. Version 4.2.0 contains a patch for the issue.Show less
1Tenda
1W30e Firmware
Jan 28, 2026
Jan 26, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credenti...Show more
Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings.Show less
-
-
Jan 26, 2026
Jan 24, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Friendly Functions for Welcart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page....Show more
The Friendly Functions for Welcart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jan 26, 2026
Jan 24, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Moderate Selected Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the msp_admin_page() function. This mak...Show more
The Moderate Selected Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the msp_admin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less