DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/templets_one_edit.php |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/media_add.php |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_edit.php. |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/catalog_del.php. |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/catalog_edit.php. |
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/archives_do.php |
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Movistar's 4G router affecting version ES_WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application in w...Show moreCross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Movistar's 4G router affecting version ES_WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application in which they are currently authenticated.Show less |
The Team Circle Image Slider With Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the circle_thumbnail_slider_with_lightbo...Show moreThe Team Circle Image Slider With Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the circle_thumbnail_slider_with_lightbox_image_management_func() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit image data which can be used to inject malicious JavaScript, along with deleting images, and uploading malicious files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Bulgarisation for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions....Show moreThe Bulgarisation for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to generate and delete labels via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The LadiApp plugn for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the init_endpoint() function hooked via 'init' in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for...Show moreThe LadiApp plugn for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the init_endpoint() function hooked via 'init' in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify a variety of settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. An attacker can directly modify the 'ladipage_key' which enables them to create new posts on the website and inject malicious web scripts,Show less |
The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the publish_lp() function hooked via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possib...Show moreThe LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the publish_lp() function hooked via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the LadiPage key (a key fully controlled by the attacker), enabling them to freely create new pages, including web pages that trigger stored XSS via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the save_config() function in versions up to, and including, 4.3. This makes it possible for unauthenticated at...Show moreThe LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the save_config() function in versions up to, and including, 4.3. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the 'ladipage_config' option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the ladiflow_save_hook() function in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthentic...Show moreThe LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the ladiflow_save_hook() function in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the 'ladiflow_hook_configs' option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Dreamer CMS 4.1.3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/menu/toEdit. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forger...Show moreA vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Dreamer CMS 4.1.3. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/menu/toEdit. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256314 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less |
A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask Hospital AutoManager up to 20240227 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /billing/bill/edit/ of the component Update Bill Page. The m...Show moreA vulnerability has been found in Bdtask Hospital AutoManager up to 20240227 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /billing/bill/edit/ of the component Update Bill Page. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256270 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less |
A vulnerability was found in Bdtask G-Prescription Gynaecology & OBS Consultation Software 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /Setting/change_password_save...Show moreA vulnerability was found in Bdtask G-Prescription Gynaecology & OBS Consultation Software 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /Setting/change_password_save of the component Password Reset Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-256046 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less |
The Digits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.4.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'digits_save_settings' function. This makes it possible...Show moreThe Digits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.4.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'digits_save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the default role of registered users to elevate user privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins docker-build-step Plugin 2.11 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified TCP or Unix socket URL, and to reconfigure the plugin using the...Show moreA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins docker-build-step Plugin 2.11 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified TCP or Unix socket URL, and to reconfigure the plugin using the provided connection test parameters, affecting future build step executions.Show less |
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier allows attackers to trigger a build. |