← Back
CWE-352

9,359 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,359)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Givewp
1Givewp
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_stripe_disconnect_connect_stripe_acco...Show more
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_stripe_disconnect_connect_stripe_account function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate the plugin's stripe integration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Givewp
1Givewp
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_sendwp_disconnect function. This make...Show more
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_sendwp_disconnect function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate the SendWP plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Givewp
1Givewp
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_sendwp_remote_install_handler functio...Show more
The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_sendwp_remote_install_handler function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to install and activate the SendWP plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Melapress
1Wp 2fa
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP 2FA – Two-factor authentication for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on t...Show more
The WP 2FA – Two-factor authentication for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the send_backup_codes_email function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send emails with arbitrary content to registered users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other registered user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. While a nonce check is present, it is only executed if a nonce is set. By omitting a nonce from the request, the check can be bypassed.Show less
1Aviplugins
1Wp Register Profile With Shortcode
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Register Profile With Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_password...Show more
The WP Register Profile With Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_password_validate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset a user's password via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
3Fedoraproject
FreeipaRedhat
21Codeready Linux Builder
Enterprise LinuxEnterprise Linux Desktop+18 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 10, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the...Show more
A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.Show less
1Bosch
1Nexo Os
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 10, 2024
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files on the file system via a crafted URL or HTTP request through a victim’s session.
1Savignano
1S Notify
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initi...Show more
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Confluence, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be.Show less
1Savignano
1S Notify
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 2.0.1 for Bitbucket. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initia...Show more
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 2.0.1 for Bitbucket. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Bitbucket, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be.Show less
1Savignano
1S Notify
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Jira. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated b...Show more
An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Jira. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Jira, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be.Show less
1Wpmet
1Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the content...Show more
The Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the contents function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the options "mf_hubsopt_token", "mf_hubsopt_refresh_token", "mf_hubsopt_token_type", and "mf_hubsopt_expires_in" via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This would allow an attacker to connect their own Hubspot account to a victim site's metform to obtain leads and contacts.Show less
1Flycms Project
1Flycms
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component system/site/webconfig_updagte.
1Flycms Project
1Flycms
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /system/site/config_footer_updagte.
1Flycms Project
1Flycms
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /system/site/userconfig_updagte.
1Yevhenkotelnytskyi
1Js & Css Script Optimizer
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yevhen Kotelnytskyi JS & CSS Script Optimizer.This issue affects JS & CSS Script Optimizer: from n/a through 0.3.3.
1Reputeinfosystems
1Armember
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Repute Infosystems ARMember – Membership Plugin, Content Restriction, Member Levels, User Profile & User signup.This issue affects ARM...Show more
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Repute Infosystems ARMember – Membership Plugin, Content Restriction, Member Levels, User Profile & User signup.This issue affects ARMember – Membership Plugin, Content Restriction, Member Levels, User Profile & User signup: n/a.Show less
1Theresehansen
1Commenttweets
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The CommentTweets WordPress plugin through 0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
1Wp Blogs Planetarium Project
1Wp Blogs Planetarium
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Blogs' Planetarium WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
1Rextheme
1Wp Vr
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP VR WordPress plugin before 8.3.15 does not authorisation and CSRF in a function hooked to admin_init, allowing unauthenticated users to downgrade the plugin, thus leading to Reflected or Stored XSS, as previous ve...Show more
The WP VR WordPress plugin before 8.3.15 does not authorisation and CSRF in a function hooked to admin_init, allowing unauthenticated users to downgrade the plugin, thus leading to Reflected or Stored XSS, as previous versions have such vulnerabilities.Show less
1Woocommerce
1Woocommerce
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WooCommerce.This issue affects WooCommerce: from n/a through 8.2.2.