CWE-352
9,697 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.
CVEs (9,697)
CVE VENDORS PRODUCTS UPDATED PUBLISHED CVSS |
|---|
The Event post plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized bulk metadata update due to a missing nonce check on the save_bulkdatas function in all versions up to, and including, 5.9.10. This makes it possible for...Show more |
The VikRentCar Car Rental Management System WordPress plugin before 1.3.2 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks |
1Oretnom23 1Employee And Visitor Gate Pass Logging System Jun 17, 2026 Jul 10, 2024 6.9 MEDIUM· v4 6.5 MEDIUM· v3 5.0 MEDIUM· v2 A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Employee and Visitor Gate Pass Logging System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function save_users of the file Users.php. The manip...Show more |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/moneyRecord_deal.php?mudi=delRecord |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/dbBakMySQL_deal.php?mudi=backup |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/serverFile_deal.php?mudi=upFileDel&dataID=3 |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/softBak_deal.php?mudi=backup |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/memberOnline_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataID=6 |
Cross-Site request forgery in Checkmk < 2.3.0p8, < 2.2.0p29, < 2.1.0p45, and <= 2.0.0p39 (EOL) could lead to 1-click compromize of the site. |
Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malici...Show more |
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ajaxterm module of Webmin versions prior to 2.003. If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended operations may be performed when a user views a malicious page while lo...Show more |
Lime Survey <= 6.5.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The YII_CSRF_TOKEN is only checked when passed in the body of POST requests, but the same check isn't performed in the equivalent GET requests. |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userGroup_deal.php?mudi=del |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userScore_deal.php?mudi=rev |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userScore_deal.php?mudi=del |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userLevel_deal.php?mudi=add. |
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userLevel_deal.php?mudi=del |
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) weaknesses [CWE-352] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of an authenticated user via...Show more |
The Just Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several AJAX function. This mak...Show more |
The Pricing Table plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax() function. This makes it p...Show more |