← Back
CWE-352

9,688 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,688)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 9, 2024
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tickera.com Tickera allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Tickera: from n/a through 3.5.1.0.
1Jwillber
1Jfinalcms
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 9, 2024
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in JFinalCMS 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/tag/save. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forger...Show more
A vulnerability was found in JFinalCMS 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/tag/save. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.Show less
1Ays Pro
1Poll Maker
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 7, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Poll Maker – Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validati...Show more
The Poll Maker – Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the duplicate_poll() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate polls via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paloma Paloma Widget postman-widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Paloma Widget: from n/a through <= 1.14.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bob Namaste! LMS namaste-lms allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Namaste! LMS: from n/a through <= 2.6.4.1.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() fu...Show more
The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render...Show more
The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu...Show more
The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Wp3dprinting
13dprint Lite
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 6, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The 3DPrint Lite WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.
1Wegia
1Wegia
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 5, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
WeGIA v3.2.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
1Abb
19Aspect Ent 12 Firmware
Aspect Ent 256 FirmwareAspect Ent 2 Firmware+16 more
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 5, 2024
7.1 HIGH· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities where found providing a potiential for exposing sensitive information or changing system settings.  Affected products: ABB ASPECT - Enterprise v3.08.02; NEXUS Series v3.08.02...Show more
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities where found providing a potiential for exposing sensitive information or changing system settings.  Affected products: ABB ASPECT - Enterprise v3.08.02; NEXUS Series v3.08.02; MATRIX Series v3.08.02Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 5, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Simple Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page() function. Thi...Show more
The Simple Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and redirect all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 4, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
binux pyspider up to v0.3.10 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Flask endpoints.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 4, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_setting...Show more
The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 4, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Posti Shipping plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the account_number and secret_key parameters in all versions up to, and including, 3.10.3 due to insufficient input sanitization...Show more
The Posti Shipping plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the account_number and secret_key parameters in all versions up to, and including, 3.10.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Ibm
1Cognos Controller
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 3, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 and 11.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 2, 2024
N/A· v4
8.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jerodmoore eDoc Easy Tables edoc-easy-tables allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects eDoc Easy Tables: from n/a through <= 1.29.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 2, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ritesh Sanap Advanced What should we write next about advanced-what-should-we-write-about-next allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced What should we write next ab...Show more
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ritesh Sanap Advanced What should we write next about advanced-what-should-we-write-about-next allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced What should we write next about: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 2, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmsaccount Photo Video Store photo-video-store allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Photo Video Store: from n/a through <= 21.07.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 2, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in homejunction SpatialMatch IDX spatialmatch-free-lifestyle-search allows Stored XSS.This issue affects SpatialMatch IDX: from n/a through <= 3.0.9.