← Back
CWE-352

9,314 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,314)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Razon Komar Pal Linked Variation for WooCommerce linked-variation-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Linked Variation for WooCommerce:...Show more
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Razon Komar Pal Linked Variation for WooCommerce linked-variation-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Linked Variation for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 1.0.5.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tuxlog wp-Monalisa wp-monalisa.This issue affects wp-Monalisa: from n/a through <= 6.4.
1Wpmudev
1Forminator Forms
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.35.1. This is due to missing or incorrect n...Show more
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.35.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the custom form 'create_module' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create draft forms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Wpmudev
1Forminator Forms
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.35.1. This is due to missing or incorrect n...Show more
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.35.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the quiz 'create_module' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create draft quizzes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Timgreen
1Dingfanzu Cms
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
dingfanzu CMS V1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the addPro parameter of the component doAdminAction.php which allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code
1Cisco
2Ata 191 Firmware
Ata 192 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and pe...Show more
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.Show less
1Apache
1Cloudstack
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Users logged into the Apache CloudStack's web interface can be tricked to submit malicious CSRF requests due to missing validation of the origin of the requests. This can allow an attacker to gain privileges and access t...Show more
Users logged into the Apache CloudStack's web interface can be tricked to submit malicious CSRF requests due to missing validation of the origin of the requests. This can allow an attacker to gain privileges and access to resources of the authenticated users and may lead to account takeover, disruption, exposure of sensitive data and compromise integrity of the resources owned by the user account that are managed by the platform. This issue affects Apache CloudStack from 4.15.1.0 through 4.18.2.3 and 4.19.0.0 through 4.19.1.1 Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.4 or 4.19.1.2, or later, which addresses this issue.Show less
1Filemanagerpro
1File Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The File Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mk_file_folder_manager' ajax...Show more
The File Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mk_file_folder_manager' ajax action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possibl...Show more
The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Wpfastestcache
1Wp Fastest Cache
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized arbitrary file deletion in versions up to, and including, 0.9.0.2 due to a lack of capability checking and insufficient path validation. This makes...Show more
The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized arbitrary file deletion in versions up to, and including, 0.9.0.2 due to a lack of capability checking and insufficient path validation. This makes it possible for authenticated users with minimal permissions to delete arbitrary files from the server.Show less
1Wpulike
1Wp Ulike
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The WP ULike – The Ultimate Engagement Toolkit for Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validati...Show more
The WP ULike – The Ultimate Engagement Toolkit for Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_ulike_delete_history_api() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete engagements via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less
1Ibm
1Watson Studio Local
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 16, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Watson Studio Local 1.2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
1Oracle
1Peoplesoft Enterprise People Tools
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: PIA Core Technology). Supported versions that are affected are 8.59, 8.60 and 8.61. Easily exploitable vulnerability allow...Show more
Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: PIA Core Technology). Supported versions that are affected are 8.59, 8.60 and 8.61. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).Show less
1Codeigniter
1Codeigniter
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Codeigniter 3.1.13 allows attackers to arbitrarily change the Administrator password and escalate privileges.
1Hono
1Hono
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Hono, a web framework, prior to version 4.6.5 is vulnerable to bypass of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) middleware by a request without Content-Type header. Although the CSRF middleware verifies the Content-Type Heade...Show more
Hono, a web framework, prior to version 4.6.5 is vulnerable to bypass of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) middleware by a request without Content-Type header. Although the CSRF middleware verifies the Content-Type Header, Hono always considers a request without a Content-Type header to be safe. This can allow an attacker to bypass CSRF protection implemented with Hono CSRF middleware. Version 4.6.5 fixes this issue.Show less
1Phpgurukul
1User Registration & Login And User Management System
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Phpgurukul User Registration & Login and User Management System 3.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /edit-profile.php.
1Splunk
2Splunk
Splunk Cloud Platform
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 14, 2024
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.1, 9.2.3, and 9.1.6 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.2.2403.108, and 9.1.2312.204, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could chan...Show more
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.1, 9.2.3, and 9.1.6 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.2.2403.108, and 9.1.2312.204, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could change the maintenance mode state of App Key Value Store (KVStore) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).Show less
1Apache
1Roller
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 14, 2024
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-site Resource Forgery (CSRF), Privilege escalation vulnerability in Apache Roller. On multi-blog/user Roller websites, by default weblog owners are trusted to publish arbitrary weblog content and this combined with...Show more
Cross-site Resource Forgery (CSRF), Privilege escalation vulnerability in Apache Roller. On multi-blog/user Roller websites, by default weblog owners are trusted to publish arbitrary weblog content and this combined with a deficiency in Roller's CSRF protections allowed an escalation of privileges attack. This issue affects Apache Roller before 6.1.4. Roller users who run multi-blog/user Roller websites are recommended to upgrade to version 6.1.4, which fixes the issue. Roller 6.1.4 release announcement:  https://lists.apache.org/thread/3c3f6rwqptyw6wdc95654fq5vlosqdpwShow less
1Lollms
1Lollms Web Ui
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 13, 2024
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in parisneo/lollms-webui version 9.8 allows for a Denial of Service (DOS) attack when uploading an audio file. If an attacker appends a large number of characters to the end of a multipart boundary, the s...Show more
A vulnerability in parisneo/lollms-webui version 9.8 allows for a Denial of Service (DOS) attack when uploading an audio file. If an attacker appends a large number of characters to the end of a multipart boundary, the system will continuously process each character, rendering lollms-webui inaccessible. This issue is exacerbated by the lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection, enabling remote exploitation. The vulnerability leads to service disruption, resource exhaustion, and extended downtime.Show less
1Getbutterfly
1Imagepress
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 12, 2024
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The ImagePress – Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'imagepress_admin_p...Show more
The ImagePress – Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'imagepress_admin_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings, including redirection URLs, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less