WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `objects/pluginImport.json.php` endpoint allows admin users to upload and install plugin ZIP files containing executable PHP code, b...Show moreWWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `objects/pluginImport.json.php` endpoint allows admin users to upload and install plugin ZIP files containing executable PHP code, but lacks any CSRF protection. Combined with the application explicitly setting `session.cookie_samesite = 'None'` for HTTPS connections, an unauthenticated attacker can craft a page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, silently uploads a malicious plugin containing a PHP webshell, achieving Remote Code Execution on the server. Commit d1bc1695edd9ad4468a48cea0df6cd943a2635f3 contains a patch.Show less |
A security flaw has been discovered in kalcaddle kodbox 1.64. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /workspace/source-code/plugins/oauth/controller/bind/index.class.php of the component loginSubmit API....Show moreA security flaw has been discovered in kalcaddle kodbox 1.64. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /workspace/source-code/plugins/oauth/controller/bind/index.class.php of the component loginSubmit API. Performing a manipulation of the argument third results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less |
Nexxt Solutions Nebula 300+ firmware through version 12.01.01.37 does not implement CSRF protections on state-changing endpoints such as /goform/setSysTools and other administrative interfaces. As a result, an attacker c...Show moreNexxt Solutions Nebula 300+ firmware through version 12.01.01.37 does not implement CSRF protections on state-changing endpoints such as /goform/setSysTools and other administrative interfaces. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious web requests that are executed in the context of an authenticated administrator’s browser, leading to unauthorized configuration changes, including enabling services or modifying system settings.Show less |
The Neos Connector for Fakturama plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.0.14. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ncff_add_plugin_page() function...Show moreThe Neos Connector for Fakturama plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.0.14. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ncff_add_plugin_page() function which handles settings updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.Show less |
The Xhanch - My Advanced Settings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `xms_setting()` function on t...Show moreThe Xhanch - My Advanced Settings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `xms_setting()` function on the settings update handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Settings that can be modified include favicon URL, Google Analytics account ID, and various WordPress behavior toggles. The `favicon_url` and `ga_acc_id` values are output on the front-end without escaping, enabling a CSRF to Stored XSS chain.Show less |
The Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_p...Show moreThe Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin slider-page configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Post Snippits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page handlers for saving, adding, and...Show moreThe Post Snippits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page handlers for saving, adding, and deleting snippets. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings and inject malicious scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The login_register plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page...Show moreThe login_register plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page and insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'login_register_login_post' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings up...Show moreThe Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Knowledge Graph settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes...Show moreThe SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Redirect countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `countdown_settings_content()` function. T...Show moreThe Redirect countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `countdown_settings_content()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including the countdown timeout, redirect URL, and custom text, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes...Show moreThe WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including capability, autosort, and adminsort settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Invelity Product Feeds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion via path traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing validation and sanitization in the 'createMa...Show moreThe Invelity Product Feeds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion via path traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to missing validation and sanitization in the 'createManageFeedPage' function. This makes it possible for authenticated administrator-level attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server via specially crafted requests that include path traversal sequences, granted they can trick an admin into clicking a malicious link.Show less |
Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to induce authenticated users to submit crafted requests to a profile update endpoint handling file uploads. Attacker...Show morePrecurio Intranet Portal 4.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to induce authenticated users to submit crafted requests to a profile update endpoint handling file uploads. Attackers can exploit this to upload executable files to web-accessible locations, leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the web server.Show less |
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF toke...Show moreAn issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF tokens supplied within the request body instead of requiring them through the expected request header. An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking an authenticated user into submitting a crafted request. This may allow unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.Show less |
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, the delete, activate, and deactivate modes in modules/groups-roles/groups_roles.php perform destructive state changes on organizational...Show moreAdmidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, the delete, activate, and deactivate modes in modules/groups-roles/groups_roles.php perform destructive state changes on organizational roles but never validate an anti-CSRF token. The client-side UI passes a CSRF token to callUrlHideElement(), which includes it in the POST body, but the server-side handlers ignore $_POST["adm_csrf_token"] entirely for these three modes. An attacker who can discover a role UUID (visible in the public cards view when the module is publicly accessible) can embed a forged POST form on any external page and trick any user with the rol_assign_roles right into deleting or toggling roles for the organization. Role deletion is permanent and cascades to all memberships, event associations, and rights data. If exploited, an attacker can trick any user with delegated role-assignment rights into permanently deleting roles, mass-revoking all associated memberships and access to events, documents, and mailing lists, or silently activating or deactivating entire groups, with target role UUIDs trivially harvested from the unauthenticated public cards view and no undo path short of a database restore. This issue has been fixed in version 5.0.7.Show less |
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.6 and below, the save_membership action in modules/profile/profile_function.php saves changes to a member's role membership start and end dates but does...Show moreAdmidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.6 and below, the save_membership action in modules/profile/profile_function.php saves changes to a member's role membership start and end dates but does not validate the CSRF token. The handler checks stop_membership and remove_former_membership against the CSRF token but omits save_membership from that check. Because membership UUIDs appear in the HTML source visible to authenticated users, an attacker can embed a crafted POST form on any external page and trick a role leader into submitting it, silently altering membership dates for any member of roles the victim leads. A role leader's session can be silently exploited via CSRF to manipulate any member's membership dates, terminating access by backdating, covertly extending unauthorized access, or revoking role-restricted features, all without confirmation, notification, or administrative approval. This issue has been fixed in version 5.0.7.Show less |
The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in...Show moreThe Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
MuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to permanently destroy all deleted content stored in the trash system through a simple CSRF attack. The vulnerable cTrash.empty function lacks C...Show moreMuraCMS through 10.1.10 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to permanently destroy all deleted content stored in the trash system through a simple CSRF attack. The vulnerable cTrash.empty function lacks CSRF token validation, enabling malicious websites to forge requests that irreversibly delete all trashed content when an authenticated administrator visits a crated webpage. Successful exploitation of the CSRF vulnerability results in potentially catastrophic data loss within the MuraCMS system. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious page containing the CSRF exploit, their browser automatically submits a hidden form that permanently empties the entire trash system without any validation, confirmation dialog, or user consent.Show less |