Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Mindskip xzs-mysql 学之思开源考试系统 3.9.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Multiple endpoints are affected. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the pjActionUpdate function of PHPJabbers Cinema Booking System v2.0 allows remote attackers to escalate privileges by tricking an authenticated admin into submitting an unauthorized request.Show less

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Webkul QloApps 1.6.1. Affected is the function logout of the file /en/?mylogout of the component URL Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure. They are aware about it and are working on resolving it.Show less

The LikeBot WordPress plugin through 0.85 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.Show less

IBM Security Verify Access Appliance and Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.Show less

The ShopSite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less

The DSGVO All in one for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the user_remove_form.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete admin user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less

The WP Projects Portfolio with Client Testimonials WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.Show less

Geovision GV-ASWeb with the version 6.1.1.0 or less allows attackers to modify POST request method with the GET against critical functionalities, such as account management. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56901 for a successful CSRF attack.Show less

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Geovision GV-ASWeb application with the version 6.1.1.0 or less that allows attackers to arbitrarily create Administrator accounts via a crafted GET request method. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56903 for a successful CSRF attack.Show less

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Abinav Thakuri WordPress Signature wordpress-signature allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects WordPress Signature: from n/a through <= 0.1.Show less

The WP Finance WordPress plugin through 1.3.6 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.Show less