Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The tourmaster WordPress plugin before 5.4.8 does not perform a nonce check when storing a custom-filter label taken from a request parameter, and does not escape that label when echoing it on the filter admin page, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into storing JavaScript that then executes in the admin area (stored Cross-Site Scripting via CSRF).Show less

Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)Show less

IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.Show less

The Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the (global scope, included by fvcr_admin_page_html) function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration, including API tokens, access tokens, economic activity, Hacienda environment mode, invoice and ticket emission flags, exchange rate, and branch settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less

The WOLF WordPress plugin before 1.1.0 does not perform a nonce or capability check on one of its AJAX actions, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into writing arbitrary content, including a malicious script, into a post via a cross-site request, resulting in stored Cross-Site Scripting.Show less

nebula-mesh is a self-hosted control plane for Slack Nebula mesh virtual private network. Prior to version 0.3.3, every /ui/* POST / PUT / PATCH / DELETE route processes the request as soon as the session cookie validates. SameSite=Lax on the session cookie prevents most cross-site form submits but does not protect: top-level form-submit navigations from third-party pages (some browsers still send Lax cookies on top-level POSTs); same-registrable-domain attackers (sibling-subdomain XSS, subdomain takeover); the GET /ui/logout route, which a third-party <img src=".../ui/logout"> can force-trigger. This issue has been patched in version 0.3.3.Show less

The Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete or forcibly resolve arbitrary GDPR data request records stored in the wpl_data_req table via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Melapress WP Activity Log and Melapress WP Activity Log Premium allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Activity Log: through 5.6.4; WP Activity Log Premium: through 5.6.4.Show less

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in Regular Labs Extension Manager - Administrator routes and install/update/uninstall processing did not consistently enforce component-management and installation permissions. An unauthorized backend user or CSRF attack could install, update or remove extensions.Show less

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in various admin/import/export actions of multiple Regular Labs extension - Administrator actions, editor popups and import/export requests lacked consistent token, item-permission and input-validation checks. Unauthorized backend users or CSRF attacks could expose, create or modify extension configuration and items.Show less

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in Regular Labs conditions manager - Conditions administration did not consistently enforce tokens and component/mapped-item permissions.Show less

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in various Regular Labs extension AJAX endpoints - Privileged Regular Labs AJAX endpoints did not consistently require valid CSRF tokens, matching component/item permissions and trusted server-generated form configuration. Authenticated lower-privileged users or CSRF attacks could invoke lookups or mutations outside their authorization.Show less

Vulnerability in the Oracle Work in Process product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Work in Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Work in Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Work in Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Work in Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).Show less

Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Contracts Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).Show less

Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Contracts Integration accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Contracts Integration. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L).Show less