← Back
CWE-352

9,873 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,873)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Elementor Website Builder allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Elementor Website Builder: from n/a through 4.3.1.
-
-
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was detected in ningzichun student-management-system up to 98760f5711cf6dc8b4adca53a9e207ca49b02ebf. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. It is...Show more
A vulnerability was detected in ningzichun student-management-system up to 98760f5711cf6dc8b4adca53a9e207ca49b02ebf. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less
-
-
Oct 5, 2026
Sep 24, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to version 5.0.0, the LoginRadius backend did not validate OAuth state during the authentication flow. Applications using this backend were vuln...Show more
Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to version 5.0.0, the LoginRadius backend did not validate OAuth state during the authentication flow. Applications using this backend were vulnerable to login CSRF. An attacker could cause a victim's browser session to complete authentication using an attacker-controlled LoginRadius token, making the victim authenticated as the attacker's LoginRadius identity. The issue affects only applications using the LoginRadius backend. The issue has been fixe in version 5.0.0 by enabling callback state validation for the LoginRadius backend.Show less
-
-
Sep 24, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was determined in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. Impacted is an unknown function of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/web/CommonUserController.java. Executing...Show more
A vulnerability was determined in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. Impacted is an unknown function of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/web/CommonUserController.java. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Capabilities <= 2.50.1 versions.
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF and Access Control on Site Configuration Update in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The endpoint administrator/index.php?option=com_easystore&task=appconfig.updateConfig...Show more
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF and Access Control on Site Configuration Update in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The endpoint administrator/index.php?option=com_easystore&task=appconfig.updateConfiguration updated core Joomla mail configuration (fromname, mailfrom) in configuration.php without verifying anti-CSRF tokens or checking for administrative permissions (canAdmin). A malicious site could silently modify the site's sender name and email address via forged requests from an admin's browser. Resolved by enforcing Session::checkToken('request') / Session::checkToken('post') and adding explicit administrative authorization verification via AccessControl::create()->canAdmin().Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification across Administrator AJAX API Endpoints in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The administrator ApiController only validated CSRF tokens inside the prod...Show more
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification across Administrator AJAX API Endpoints in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The administrator ApiController only validated CSRF tokens inside the products() action. All other administrative AJAX endpoints (orders, coupons, media, customers, settings, tags, categories, reviews, and collections) accepted state-changing requests without checking anti-CSRF tokens. An attacker could trick a logged-in administrator into triggering unauthorized state modifications across the store backend. Resolved by implementing global CSRF verification in ApiController::execute() for all state-changing HTTP methods (POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) via Session::checkToken().Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification in Storefront Product Review Submission in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The product review submission endpoint (index.php?option=com_easystore&tas...Show more
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification in Storefront Product Review Submission in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The product review submission endpoint (index.php?option=com_easystore&task=product.addReview) accepted submissions without verifying an anti-CSRF token (the check had been commented out in code). An attacker could trick a logged-in user into posting unauthorized reviews or submitting review spam via cross-site requests. Resolved by enforcing Session::checkToken('request') / Session::checkToken('post') in ProductController, injecting HTMLHelper::_('form.token') into the review form template, and appending the session token to the submission payload in review-form.js.Show less
1Redaxo
1Redaxo
Oct 19, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
REDAXO is a PHP-based content management system. Prior to 5.21.2, rex_api_install_package_update in redaxo/src/addons/install/lib/api/api_package_update.php inherits the false default from rex_api_function::requiresCsrfP...Show more
REDAXO is a PHP-based content management system. Prior to 5.21.2, rex_api_install_package_update in redaxo/src/addons/install/lib/api/api_package_update.php inherits the false default from rex_api_function::requiresCsrfProtection() instead of requiring a CSRF token. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a logged-in administrator's browser to request a selected package update from the configured REDAXO package server, changing installed addon code or disrupting the site without the administrator's intent. This issue is fixed in version 5.21.2.Show less
-
-
Sep 26, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
CMSimple 5.24 ships with CSRF protection disabled by default, which turns csrfProtection() into a no-op on every state-changing admin request, and it does not send the csrf_token hidden field in admin forms. Because admi...Show more
CMSimple 5.24 ships with CSRF protection disabled by default, which turns csrfProtection() into a no-op on every state-changing admin request, and it does not send the csrf_token hidden field in admin forms. Because administrator authentication is cookie-only and no CSRF token is enforced, an unauthenticated attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to issue a forged content-save request with a text payload containing a scripting marker. The marker is stored verbatim into content/content.php; on every subsequent page view evaluate_cmsimple_scripting() (functions.php) executes the marker body with PHP eval() — for all visitors, including unauthenticated ones. This yields persistent remote code execution on the web server.Show less
-
-
Sep 24, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measure...Show more
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page.Show less
-
-
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
MISP's WorkflowsController exposed the moduleStatelessExecution action in the Security component's unlockedActions list. In CakePHP, listing an action in unlockedActions disables both the CSRF token check and the field h...Show more
MISP's WorkflowsController exposed the moduleStatelessExecution action in the Security component's unlockedActions list. In CakePHP, listing an action in unlockedActions disables both the CSRF token check and the field hash validation for that action. Because moduleStatelessExecution executes a workflow module's exec() method with caller-supplied input and parameters, the absence of CSRF protection allowed an attacker to craft a cross-site form post (or equivalent cross-origin request) that, when submitted by an authenticated site administrator, would cause the administrator's browser to invoke the action on the MISP instance.  The attacker could select any workflow module to execute, including action modules that write blocklist and warninglist entries, and supply arbitrary input and parameters of their choosing. This constitutes a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability with high integrity impact on the MISP instance's security-related data.  The vulnerability was identified during an internal security review and was not externally reported. The fix is included in MISP v2.5.47.Show less
-
-
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
N/A· v4
4.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.2.7, the OAuth callback handler in src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/AbsAuth.java skips comparison of stateToken and cookieToken whe...Show more
draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.2.7, the OAuth callback handler in src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/AbsAuth.java skips comparison of stateToken and cookieToken whenever IS_GAE is false, which affects self-hosted Docker and WAR deployments. An attacker can provide an authorization code for the attacker's cloud-storage identity and induce a victim to visit a callback URL, causing the victim's draw.io session to become authenticated as the attacker identity without a valid state binding. The shared handler affects Google Drive, OneDrive, GitHub, GitLab, and Dropbox integrations. The victim can then unknowingly perform cloud-storage actions under the attacker's identity, causing session integrity loss and misattribution, but the identity binding does not itself grant access to existing victim cloud files. This issue is fixed in version 30.2.7.Show less
-
-
Sep 24, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.91.1, ValidateOAuthState clears the oauth_state_ session value to an empty string after a successful OAuth c...Show more
Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.91.1, ValidateOAuthState clears the oauth_state_ session value to an empty string after a successful OAuth callback and later accepts an empty state parameter as equal, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bind a victim's Hatchet session to an attacker-controlled OAuth identity. Exploitation requires the victim to have completed an OAuth flow in the current session and the deployment to enable auth.google.enabled, auth.github.enabled, or the Slack integration. This issue is fixed in version 0.91.1.Show less
-
-
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
MISP has a security issue that could let an attacker change threat-intelligence data through a logged-in user’s browser without that user knowingly approving the change. The affected function did not properly enforce MI...Show more
MISP has a security issue that could let an attacker change threat-intelligence data through a logged-in user’s browser without that user knowingly approving the change. The affected function did not properly enforce MISP’s usual protection against forged requests. Because of this, an attacker could create a malicious webpage that silently sends a request to MISP when visited by an authenticated user. If successful, the attacker could change details of an attribute, such as its value, type, category, comment, distribution settings, or related timestamps. The attack requires the victim to already be logged in to MISP and to visit an attacker-controlled page. The main impact is unauthorized modification of threat-intelligence data, which could lead to incorrect indicators, wrong classifications, or altered sharing settings and reduce confidence in the accuracy of the information stored in MISP. Version affected: <2.5.47Show less
-
-
Sep 21, 2026
Sep 20, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Sign-up Sheets WordPress plugin before 2.4.0 does not properly validate the CSRF nonce that protects its sign-up deletion action, allowing attackers to delete sign-up records via a forged request handled in the sessi...Show more
The Sign-up Sheets WordPress plugin before 2.4.0 does not properly validate the CSRF nonce that protects its sign-up deletion action, allowing attackers to delete sign-up records via a forged request handled in the session of a logged-in user with the required capability.Show less
-
-
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages. Attackers can auto-submit contact forms from attacker-controlled pages to send forg...Show more
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages. Attackers can auto-submit contact forms from attacker-controlled pages to send forged messages attributed to authenticated victims to the administrator inbox.Show less
-
-
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious pages that auto-submit POST...Show more
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious pages that auto-submit POST requests to modify stored rating data when visited by logged-in users.Show less
1Ibm
1Guardium Data Protection
Oct 6, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
1Ibm
1Guardium Data Protection
Oct 6, 2026
Sep 18, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.