Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in César Martín TOCHAT.BE tochat-be allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects TOCHAT.BE: from n/a through <= 1.3.4. |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matat Technologies Deliver via Shipos for WooCommerce wc-shipos-delivery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Deliver via Shipos for WooCommerce: from n/...Show moreCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matat Technologies Deliver via Shipos for WooCommerce wc-shipos-delivery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Deliver via Shipos for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 3.0.2.Show less |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amin Y AgreeMe Checkboxes For WooCommerce agreeme-checkboxes-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AgreeMe Checkboxes For WooCommerce: fro...Show moreCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amin Y AgreeMe Checkboxes For WooCommerce agreeme-checkboxes-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AgreeMe Checkboxes For WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 1.1.3.Show less |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Md Taufiqur Rahman RIS Version Switcher – Downgrade or Upgrade WP Versions Easily ris-version-switcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RIS Version S...Show moreCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Md Taufiqur Rahman RIS Version Switcher – Downgrade or Upgrade WP Versions Easily ris-version-switcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RIS Version Switcher – Downgrade or Upgrade WP Versions Easily: from n/a through <= 1.0.Show less |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in activewebsight SEO Backlink Monitor seo-backlink-monitor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SEO Backlink Monitor: from n/a through <= 1.8.0. |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mihdan Mihdan: No External Links mihdan-no-external-links allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mihdan: No External Links: from n/a through <= 5.1.6.2. |
A vulnerability was detected in Webkul QloApps up to 1.7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component CSRF Token Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument token results in authorization bypass. The attack...Show moreA vulnerability was detected in Webkul QloApps up to 1.7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component CSRF Token Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument token results in authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor explains: "As We are already aware about this vulnerability and our Internal team are already working on this issue. (...) We'll implement the fix for this vulnerability in our next major release."Show less |
The Custom Login And Signup Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the /frndzk_adminclsw...Show moreThe Custom Login And Signup Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the /frndzk_adminclsw.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the email and username settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Browser Sniff plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for...Show moreThe Browser Sniff plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The osTicket WP Bridge plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possi...Show moreThe osTicket WP Bridge plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Internal Links Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link deletion functiona...Show moreThe Internal Links Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link deletion functionality in the process_bulk_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete SEO links via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the server (license) registration page in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.7, 2023.Q3.1...Show moreCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the server (license) registration page in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.7, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.9, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to register a server license via the 'orderUuid' parameter.Show less |
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartvista BackOffice SmartVista Suite 2.2.22 via crafted GET request. |
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the ResetPasswordRequest operation of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) when the zimbraFeatureResetPasswordStatus attribute is enabled. An attacker can exploit this by...Show moreA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the ResetPasswordRequest operation of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) when the zimbraFeatureResetPasswordStatus attribute is enabled. An attacker can exploit this by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a malicious webpage that silently sends a crafted SOAP request to reset the user's password. The vulnerability stems from a lack of CSRF token validation on the endpoint, allowing password resets without the user's consent.Show less |
The The Hack Repair Guy's Plugin Archiver plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bulk_rem...Show moreThe The Hack Repair Guy's Plugin Archiver plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bulk_remove() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to arbitrary directory deletion in /wp-content via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The User Sync – Remote User Sync plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mo_user_sync_form...Show moreThe User Sync – Remote User Sync plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mo_user_sync_form_handler() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The USS Upyun plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uss_setting_page function when proce...Show moreThe USS Upyun plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uss_setting_page function when processing the uss_set form type. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify critical Upyun cloud storage settings including bucket name, operator credentials, upload paths, and image processing parameters via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in the Profile Page of the PHPGurukul Student-Result-Management-System-Using-PHP-V2.0. This flaw allows an attacker to trick authenticated users into unint...Show moreA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in the Profile Page of the PHPGurukul Student-Result-Management-System-Using-PHP-V2.0. This flaw allows an attacker to trick authenticated users into unintentionally modifying their account details. By crafting a malicious HTML page, an attacker can submit unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint: /create-class.php.Show less |
The Ultimate Blogroll plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possib...Show moreThe Ultimate Blogroll plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |
The Side Slide Responsive Menu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it...Show moreThe Side Slide Responsive Menu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.Show less |