← Back
CWE-352

9,638 CVEs • Abstraction: Compound • Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (9,638)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Aug 31, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Budibase before 3.40.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the chat-link handoff endpoint that allows attackers to bind an external chat identity to a victim's account. Attackers can craft a phishing p...Show more
Budibase before 3.40.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the chat-link handoff endpoint that allows attackers to bind an external chat identity to a victim's account. Attackers can craft a phishing page that auto-submits a POST request with a leaked confirmation token to bind their chat identity to a victim user's account, enabling impersonation within agent operations and inheritance of victim permissions.Show less
1Elastic
1Kibana
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a specially crafted Vega visualization...Show more
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a specially crafted Vega visualization that, when it is opened by another user, causes authenticated requests to be issued to Kibana in the context of the viewing user's session.Show less
1Ibm
1I
Aug 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.
1Ibm
1Planning Analytics Local
Aug 17, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 Local is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
-
-
Aug 18, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
7.2 HIGH· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
phpList before 3.7.0-RC5 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in lists/admin/admins.php. The administrator deletion action is triggered via an unauthenticated GET request (?page=admins&delete=N) tha...Show more
phpList before 3.7.0-RC5 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in lists/admin/admins.php. The administrator deletion action is triggered via an unauthenticated GET request (?page=admins&delete=N) that is not protected by a CSRF token (the central verifyCsrfGetToken check uses enforce=false and is bypassed when the token parameter is absent). A remote attacker can trick a logged-in super-administrator into loading a crafted URL (e.g., embedded as an image in an email) to delete any non-self administrator account.Show less
-
-
Aug 14, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
phpList before 3.7.0-RC5 fail to enforce CSRF token validation on the bounce rule deletion endpoint (bouncerules.php / bouncerule.php). The deletion is performed via a GET request (?page=bouncerules&del=N), and the centr...Show more
phpList before 3.7.0-RC5 fail to enforce CSRF token validation on the bounce rule deletion endpoint (bouncerules.php / bouncerule.php). The deletion is performed via a GET request (?page=bouncerules&del=N), and the central CSRF check (verifyCsrfGetToken) is invoked with enforce=false, so it only validates the token when a 'tk' parameter is present. A remote attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into loading a crafted URL (e.g., embedded in an image tag) to delete arbitrary bounce rules from the phplist_bounceregex table without a valid CSRF token.Show less
1Synacor
1Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Aug 28, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Exchange Web Services (EWS) endpoint of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) due to insufficient validation of request c...Show more
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Exchange Web Services (EWS) endpoint of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) due to insufficient validation of request content types. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by causing an authenticated user to submit a crafted request, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.Show less
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
basecamp/upright at commit efe4f2e5254ac6e57e45d2261804cca74dbbca3f disables Rails CSRF protection for its Alertmanager and Prometheus proxy controllers. An unauthenticated attacker can induce a logged-in user's browser...Show more
basecamp/upright at commit efe4f2e5254ac6e57e45d2261804cca74dbbca3f disables Rails CSRF protection for its Alertmanager and Prometheus proxy controllers. An unauthenticated attacker can induce a logged-in user's browser to submit requests that are forwarded to enabled upstream write or management endpoints, such as creating an Alertmanager silence or requesting a Prometheus reload. The final impact depends on the APIs enabled by the upstream services.Show less
-
-
Aug 28, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where JavaScript responses containing data could be referenced by external pages, potentially allowing sensitive information to be captured by an attacker-controlled page (JavaScri...Show more
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where JavaScript responses containing data could be referenced by external pages, potentially allowing sensitive information to be captured by an attacker-controlled page (JavaScript hijacking) under certain conditions.Show less
-
-
Aug 26, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The ShopEngine Elementor WooCommerce Builder Addon WordPress plugin before 4.9.3 does not protect one of its authentication endpoints against CSRF, allowing an attacker to log a victim into an attacker-controlled accoun...Show more
The ShopEngine Elementor WooCommerce Builder Addon WordPress plugin before 4.9.3 does not protect one of its authentication endpoints against CSRF, allowing an attacker to log a victim into an attacker-controlled account, so that the billing and shipping details the victim then enters at checkout are stored under and readable by the attacker.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
5.1 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Astro is a web framework for content-driven websites. From 7.0.0 until 7.0.6, the composable astro/hono pipeline installs security.checkOrigin only through the middleware() primitive, while actions() and pages() can disp...Show more
Astro is a web framework for content-driven websites. From 7.0.0 until 7.0.6, the composable astro/hono pipeline installs security.checkOrigin only through the middleware() primitive, while actions() and pages() can dispatch to user code independently. Mounting actions() before middleware(), as in the examples/advanced-routing example and Cloudflare Hono documentation, allows cross-origin form-encoded action requests to execute before the origin check, and using pages() without middleware() drops the check for on-demand endpoints and pages. The flaw enables blind write-only cross-site request forgery using the victim's cookies against ActionHandler.handle and PagesHandler.handleWithErrorFallback when manifest.checkOrigin is enabled; the attacker can trigger a state-mutating action or endpoint handler but cannot read the cross-origin response. The default non-composable astro() pipeline is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.6.Show less
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
6.1 MEDIUM· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Nagios Core before 4.5.14 and Nagios XI before 2026R1.7 contain a cross-site request forgery protection bypass via a self-supplied double-submit cookie. An attacker can supply matching cookie and request parameter values...Show more
Nagios Core before 4.5.14 and Nagios XI before 2026R1.7 contain a cross-site request forgery protection bypass via a self-supplied double-submit cookie. An attacker can supply matching cookie and request parameter values to bypass CSRF protection, enabling unauthenticated attackers to run commands as authorized users via malicious links.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Semaphore UI is a web interface for managing DevOps tools. Prior to 2.18.21, the /api/users/{id}/password endpoint accepts a cross-site request using the authenticated user's semaphore session cookie without CSRF protect...Show more
Semaphore UI is a web interface for managing DevOps tools. Prior to 2.18.21, the /api/users/{id}/password endpoint accepts a cross-site request using the authenticated user's semaphore session cookie without CSRF protection or current-password confirmation, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to change an administrator's or another user's password after user interaction. This issue is fixed in version 2.18.21.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, the sensitive `mode=export` action in `modules/sso/keys.php` exports a PKCS#12 bundle containing the configured private key and certificate, bu...Show more
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, the sensitive `mode=export` action in `modules/sso/keys.php` exports a PKCS#12 bundle containing the configured private key and certificate, but the CSRF validation line is commented out. A forged cross-site POST from an administrator session can therefore trigger private key export without a valid form token. Version 5.0.10 contains a fix.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/sso/clients.php` validates an `adm_csrf_token` on every state-changing branch except `enable`. The `enable` case loads the SAML or OID...Show more
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/sso/clients.php` validates an `adm_csrf_token` on every state-changing branch except `enable`. The `enable` case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls `$client->enable($enabled)`, and persists the new state with no token check. Because the action is reachable via plain GET parameters, a third-party page can trick an authenticated administrator into disabling (or silently re-enabling) any configured SAML or OIDC client. Disabling an SSO client breaks every downstream relying-party application that authenticates through it. Version 5.0.10 contains a fix.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
5.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. `modules/registration.php` mode `send_login` regenerates a random password for `user_uuid_assigned`, stores its bcrypt hash in `adm_users.usr_password`, and emails the...Show more
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. `modules/registration.php` mode `send_login` regenerates a random password for `user_uuid_assigned`, stores its bcrypt hash in `adm_users.usr_password`, and emails the cleartext to that user. Every other state-changing mode in the same file (`assign_member`, `assign_user`, `delete_user`, `create_user`) calls `SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token'])` first; the `send_login` branch does not. Prior to version 5.0.10, page visited by a registration-administrator can issue the request as a top-level navigation, the browser sends the admin's `SameSite=Lax` cookies, and the server resets the chosen user's password without any further interaction from the admin. Version 5.0.10 fixes the issue.Show less
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Claude Code Templates is a CLI tool for configuring and monitoring Claude Code. Prior to 1.29.4, the Claude Code Studio server launched by the --studio option in cli-tool/src/sandbox-server.js binds to all interfaces on...Show more
Claude Code Templates is a CLI tool for configuring and monitoring Claude Code. Prior to 1.29.4, the Claude Code Studio server launched by the --studio option in cli-tool/src/sandbox-server.js binds to all interfaces on port 3444, permits cross-origin requests, and requires no authentication. The POST /api/execute endpoint passes the prompt request-body field to executeLocalTask(), and POST /api/install-agent passes the agentName request-body field to a child process. The same unsafe agent field path is reachable from /api/execute through checkAndInstallAgent(). These attacker-controlled values reach child_process.spawn() with shell execution enabled, causing Node.js to construct a shell command in which metacharacters are interpreted. An attacker who can reach the port directly, or who convinces a developer running Studio to visit a malicious website, can execute arbitrary operating-system commands with the developer's privileges and compromise source code, credentials, and local data. This issue is fixed in version 1.29.4.Show less
-
-
Aug 26, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Affected versions of MISP cti-transmute expose several state-changing account operations as GET requests: * /account/follow * /account/delete_notification * /account/mark_notification_read * /acc...Show more
Affected versions of MISP cti-transmute expose several state-changing account operations as GET requests: * /account/follow * /account/delete_notification * /account/mark_notification_read * /account/mark_all_read These endpoints require authentication, but before the fix they could be invoked with simple GET requests. That makes them susceptible to cross-site request forgery because a third-party site can induce the victim’s browser to send authenticated GET requests automatically. The patch converts the actions to POST or DELETE and updates the frontend to include an X-CSRFToken header, providing explicit CSRF protection for those state-changing operations.Show less
-
-
Aug 26, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
7.3 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
The referrer enforcement introduced with TYPO3-CORE-SA-2020-006 (CVE-2020-11069) became ineffective in TYPO3 v13.0, where TYPO3 CMS started serving the backend and Install Tool applications from the site's main entry scr...Show more
The referrer enforcement introduced with TYPO3-CORE-SA-2020-006 (CVE-2020-11069) became ineffective in TYPO3 v13.0, where TYPO3 CMS started serving the backend and Install Tool applications from the site's main entry script instead of the dedicated typo3/ directory. Whether a request originated from the backend or Install Tool itself was determined by comparing the referrer against the directory of the entry script, which since then is the site root. As a consequence, requests originating from any script running on one of the TYPO3 instance's own domains, such as a frontend page, were accepted by backend routes and Install Tool endpoints. Attackers able to execute JavaScript on one of those domains, for instance by exploiting a cross-site scripting vulnerability, could invoke these endpoints via Fetch/XHR with the privileges of an authenticated victim's user session. This issue affects TYPO3 CMS versions 13.0.0-13.4.33 and 14.0.0-14.3.5.Show less
1Sap
1Approuter
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploi...Show more
SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.Show less