← Back
CWE-347

675 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (675)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
3Mutt
NeomuttRedhat
3Enterprise Linux
MuttNeomutt
Jul 16, 2025
Nov 12, 2024
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compr...Show more
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality.Show less
1Dataease
1Dataease
Feb 20, 2025
Nov 7, 2024
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
DataEase is an open source data visualization analysis tool that helps users quickly analyze data and gain insights into business trends. In affected versions a the lack of signature verification of jwt tokens allows att...Show more
DataEase is an open source data visualization analysis tool that helps users quickly analyze data and gain insights into business trends. In affected versions a the lack of signature verification of jwt tokens allows attackers to forge jwts which then allow access to any interface. The vulnerability has been fixed in v2.10.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.Show less
1Huawei
1Harmonyos
Nov 7, 2024
Nov 5, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Permission control vulnerability in the hidebug module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
-
-
Nov 1, 2024
Oct 31, 2024
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Laravel Reverb provides a real-time WebSocket communication backend for Laravel applications. Prior to 1.4.0, there is an issue where verification signatures for requests sent to Reverb's Pusher-compatible API were not b...Show more
Laravel Reverb provides a real-time WebSocket communication backend for Laravel applications. Prior to 1.4.0, there is an issue where verification signatures for requests sent to Reverb's Pusher-compatible API were not being verified. This API is used in scenarios such as broadcasting a message from a backend service or for obtaining statistical information (such as number of connections) about a given channel. This issue only affects the Pusher-compatible API endpoints and not the WebSocket connections themselves. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the application ID which, should never be exposed, would need to be known by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.0.Show less
-
-
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 25, 2024
4.6 MEDIUM· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
ABB is aware of privately reported vulnerabilities in the product versions referenced in this CVE. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a specially crafted firmware or configuration to the system no...Show more
ABB is aware of privately reported vulnerabilities in the product versions referenced in this CVE. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a specially crafted firmware or configuration to the system node, causing the node to stop, become inaccessible, or allowing the attacker to take control of the node.Show less
1Indutny
1Elliptic
Nov 25, 2025
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
4.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at least four leading 0 bytes and when the order of the elliptic curve's base point...Show more
The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at least four leading 0 bytes and when the order of the elliptic curve's base point is smaller than the hash, because of an _truncateToN anomaly. This leads to valid signatures being rejected. Legitimate transactions or communications may be incorrectly flagged as invalid.Show less
-
-
Nov 3, 2025
Oct 15, 2024
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The firmware upgrade function in the admin web interface of the Rittal IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit devices checks if the patch files are signed before executing the containing run.sh script. The signing pro...Show more
The firmware upgrade function in the admin web interface of the Rittal IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit devices checks if the patch files are signed before executing the containing run.sh script. The signing process is kind of an HMAC with a long string as key which is hard-coded in the firmware and is freely available for download. This allows crafting malicious "signed" .patch files in order to compromise the device and execute arbitrary code.Show less
-
-
Oct 15, 2024
Oct 11, 2024
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists that could compromise the Data Center Expert software when an upgrade bundle is manipulated to include arbitrary bash scripts that are execut...Show more
CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists that could compromise the Data Center Expert software when an upgrade bundle is manipulated to include arbitrary bash scripts that are executed as root.Show less
1Github
1Enterprise Server
Nov 15, 2024
Oct 10, 2024
9.5 CRITICAL· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access...Show more
An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.Show less
1Indutny
1Elliptic
Nov 25, 2025
Oct 10, 2024
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation.
1Ssoready
1Ssoready
Mar 6, 2025
Oct 9, 2024
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
ssoready is a single sign on provider implemented via docker. Affected versions are vulnerable to XML signature bypass attacks. An attacker can carry out signature bypass if you have access to certain IDP-signed messages...Show more
ssoready is a single sign on provider implemented via docker. Affected versions are vulnerable to XML signature bypass attacks. An attacker can carry out signature bypass if you have access to certain IDP-signed messages. The underlying mechanism exploits differential behavior between XML parsers. Users of https://ssoready.com, the public hosted instance of SSOReady, are unaffected. We advise folks who self-host SSOReady to upgrade to 7f92a06 or later. Do so by updating your SSOReady Docker images from sha-... to sha-7f92a06. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.Show less
1Alpsalpine
1Ilx F509 Firmware
Oct 3, 2024
Sep 28, 2024
N/A· v4
4.6 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Alpine Halo9 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to bypass signature validation mechanism on affected installations of Alpine Halo9 devic...Show more
Alpine Halo9 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to bypass signature validation mechanism on affected installations of Alpine Halo9 devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware metadata signature validation mechanism. The issue results from the lack of proper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-23102Show less
-
-
Sep 26, 2024
Sep 25, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper verification of cryptographic signature during installation of a Printer driver via the TeamViewer_service.exe component of TeamViewer Remote Clients prior version 15.58.4 for Windows allows an attacker with loc...Show more
Improper verification of cryptographic signature during installation of a Printer driver via the TeamViewer_service.exe component of TeamViewer Remote Clients prior version 15.58.4 for Windows allows an attacker with local unprivileged access on a Windows system to elevate their privileges and install drivers.Show less
-
-
Sep 26, 2024
Sep 25, 2024
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper verification of cryptographic signature during installation of a VPN driver via the TeamViewer_service.exe component of TeamViewer Remote Clients prior version 15.58.4 for Windows allows an attacker with local u...Show more
Improper verification of cryptographic signature during installation of a VPN driver via the TeamViewer_service.exe component of TeamViewer Remote Clients prior version 15.58.4 for Windows allows an attacker with local unprivileged access on a Windows system to elevate their privileges and install drivers.Show less
-
-
Dec 12, 2024
Sep 19, 2024
N/A· v4
7.7 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based...Show more
A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.Show less
1Libreoffice
1Libreoffice
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 17, 2024
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Digital Signature Invalidation  vulnerability in Zip Repair Mode of The Document Foundation LibreOffice allows Signature forgery vulnerability in LibreOfficeThis issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.2 before < 24....Show more
Improper Digital Signature Invalidation  vulnerability in Zip Repair Mode of The Document Foundation LibreOffice allows Signature forgery vulnerability in LibreOfficeThis issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.2 before < 24.2.5.Show less
1Secreto31126
1Whatsapp Api Js
Sep 19, 2024
Sep 12, 2024
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
whatsapp-api-js is a TypeScript server agnostic Whatsapp's Official API framework. It's possible to check the payload validation using the WhatsAppAPI.verifyRequestSignature and expect false when the signature is valid....Show more
whatsapp-api-js is a TypeScript server agnostic Whatsapp's Official API framework. It's possible to check the payload validation using the WhatsAppAPI.verifyRequestSignature and expect false when the signature is valid. Incorrect Access Control, anyone using the post or verifyRequestSignature methods to handle messages is impacted. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.0.3.Show less
3Gitlab
OmniauthOnelogin
3Gitlab
Omniauth SamlRuby Saml
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 10, 2024
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response. An unauthenticated attacker with a...Show more
The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response. An unauthenticated attacker with access to any signed saml document (by the IdP) can thus forge a SAML Response/Assertion with arbitrary contents. This would allow the attacker to log in as arbitrary user within the vulnerable system. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.17.0 and 1.12.3.Show less
-
-
Mar 27, 2025
Aug 23, 2024
N/A· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Applications that use spring-boot-loader or spring-boot-loader-classic and contain custom code that performs signature verification of nested jar files may be vulnerable to signature forgery where content that appears to...Show more
Applications that use spring-boot-loader or spring-boot-loader-classic and contain custom code that performs signature verification of nested jar files may be vulnerable to signature forgery where content that appears to have been signed by one signer has, in fact, been signed by another.Show less
1Github
1Enterprise Server
Sep 30, 2024
Aug 20, 2024
9.5 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An XML signature wrapping vulnerability was present in GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) when using SAML authentication with specific identity providers utilizing publicly exposed signed federation metadata XML. This vulne...Show more
An XML signature wrapping vulnerability was present in GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) when using SAML authentication with specific identity providers utilizing publicly exposed signed federation metadata XML. This vulnerability allowed an attacker with direct network access to GitHub Enterprise Server to forge a SAML response to provision and/or gain access to a user with site administrator privileges. Exploitation of this vulnerability would allow unauthorized access to the instance without requiring prior authentication. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.14 and was fixed in versions 3.13.3, 3.12.8, 3.11.14, and 3.10.16. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.Show less