← Back
CWE-347

942 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (942)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 14, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
PAX Technology Q80 Application Installer Signature Verification Bypass Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PAX...Show more
PAX Technology Q80 Application Installer Signature Verification Bypass Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PAX Technology Q80. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the application installer. The issue results from the lack of proper verification of a cryptographic signature before installing an application. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-30585.Show less
-
-
Sep 18, 2026
Aug 14, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Starting in version 4.8 and prior to version 5.3, kas checks out and processes repositories regarding configuration includes prior to validating signatures of those reposit...Show more
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Starting in version 4.8 and prior to version 5.3, kas checks out and processes repositories regarding configuration includes prior to validating signatures of those repositories. This may allow to replace on original repository with one under the control of an attacker under very specific conditions. First of all, the attacker must have gained control of a repository that a kas file of the victim is referencing. Furthermore, the following conditions must be fulfilled: the victim's kas configuration must include a configuration file from the attacked repository; the repository state is referenced by tag, and no commit ID is specified (this is triggering a warning, though); the key used for validating the tag or commit signature is stored as file in a repository; no fingerprint for the key is specified; and the `_source_dir` key must not be set by the victim when calling kas (e.g. by avoiding a local `.config.yaml`). Given these conditions, the attacker could modify the included kas configuration in way that the key used to validate the tag signature of the attacker's repository could be replaced by an attacker-chosen key. No other exploit possibilities have been identified so far, but this does not rule out that those may exist. All patches have been released along with kas version 5.3. As a workaround, pin the expected signature key via its fingerprint, also when storing it as file in a repository.Show less
-
-
Sep 18, 2026
Aug 14, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding i...Show more
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one.Show less
-
-
Sep 3, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
8.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This at...Show more
A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This attack allows for a malicious GOPROXY to serve malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. All tiles are now correctly verified against their parents. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidyShow less
-
-
Sep 3, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that can...Show more
A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidyShow less
-
-
Aug 14, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Unauthenticated Bypass Vulnerability in Headless Single Sign On <= 1.6 versions.
-
-
Aug 31, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Zohocorp ManageEngine Password Manager Pro versions before 13232 and PAM360 versions before 8551 are vulnerable to an authentication bypass vulnerability due to improper SAML validation.
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 13, 2026
N/A· v4
2.0 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. Version 2.0.0 erroneously removed verification of the integrated (Rekor entry) time) against the Fulcio certificate. Version 2.1.0 re-...Show more
sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. Version 2.0.0 erroneously removed verification of the integrated (Rekor entry) time) against the Fulcio certificate. Version 2.1.0 re-added this verification with enhancements that adhere to the Sigstore verification spec. The old sigstore-conformance test for this check was built incorrectly. This vulnerability impacts only users verifying bundles with `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.0.0`. Older versions are not affected; it is fixed in `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.1.0` A malicious actor may exploit this if they were able to access a users system and exfiltrate the temporary private key used during signing and then reuse an old fulcio certificate later without requiring direct access to the user's credentials. Users may protect themselves by re-verifying their artifacts using the newest sigstore-java or another current sigstore client. Transparency logs may also be audited for unauthorized signatures for a suspected reused identity.Show less
1Jfrog
1Artifactory
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A holder of a valid integration credential may impersonate other users under specific conditions.
1Jfrog
1Artifactory
Sep 2, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A user with access to a valid SAML response may impersonate another user under specific conditions.
-
-
Sep 29, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped.
-
-
Sep 29, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4, bootxsa.efi fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped.
1Microsoft
13Windows 10 1607
Windows 10 1809Windows 10 21h2+10 more
Aug 16, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Windows Schannel allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
-
-
Oct 20, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in Picketlink's SP signature validation; a SAML response containing zero assertion elements matching the signature check can allow an attacker to forge a SAML response and auth as any principal with any...Show more
A flaw was found in Picketlink's SP signature validation; a SAML response containing zero assertion elements matching the signature check can allow an attacker to forge a SAML response and auth as any principal with any roles on the protected application.Show less
-
-
Oct 20, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in Picketlink Federation SAML; the unsolcited response handler would accept forged assertions with no verification or validation, permitting an unauthed attacker to authenticate as any principal in any r...Show more
A flaw was found in Picketlink Federation SAML; the unsolcited response handler would accept forged assertions with no verification or validation, permitting an unauthed attacker to authenticate as any principal in any role. This could lead to information disclosure, access to restricted operations, or other flaws.Show less
1Sap
1Approuter
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 11, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasse...Show more
SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasses the integrity check and loads another user's session context. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to have previously observed matching session values out-of-band, which makes the attack complex to execute. This could result in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.Show less
-
-
Sep 8, 2026
Aug 10, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Pega Platform versions 8.5.0 through 25.1.2 are affected by an improper validation of cryptographic signatures that may allow an attacker to bypass security controls.
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 10, 2026
4.4 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Improper verification of cryptographic signature and Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Estonian Information System Authority (RIA) libdigidocpp, DigiDoc4, DigiDoc on Android, and DigiD...Show more
Improper verification of cryptographic signature and Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Estonian Information System Authority (RIA) libdigidocpp, DigiDoc4, DigiDoc on Android, and DigiDoc on iOS. This issue affects libdigidocpp: from 4.1.0 before 4.2.1; DigiDoc4: from 4.7.0 before 4.8.2; DigiDoc on Android: from 2.7.0 before 2.7.2; DigiDoc on iOS: from 2.8.0 before 2.8.1.Show less
-
-
Sep 1, 2026
Aug 10, 2026
N/A· v4
6.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
systemd-homed contains a local privilege escalation bug via arbitrary system group addition to a local, logged in, homed-managed user
-
-
Sep 9, 2026
Aug 7, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, header signature verification counts the unused padding bits of the PubKeysBitmap toward the two-thirds validator quorum. These paddi...Show more
Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, header signature verification counts the unused padding bits of the PubKeysBitmap toward the two-thirds validator quorum. These padding bits do not correspond to any validator and are ignored by the actual BLS aggregate-signature check, so a malicious or compromised block producer can set them to reach the required quorum while gathering fewer genuine validator signatures than the protocol demands. As a result, nodes that import or intercept the header accept it as correctly signed without a real two-thirds quorum, weakening consensus safety and undermining finality. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.Show less