← Back
CWE-345

877 CVEs • Abstraction: Class

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (877)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Oct 24, 2026
Oct 24, 2026
N/A· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Postiz signs its session, invitation and password reset tokens with one shared secret and without any marker of what a token is for. A route that refreshes the credentials of a browser-extension channel signed data taken...Show more
Postiz signs its session, invitation and password reset tokens with one shared secret and without any marker of what a token is for. A route that refreshes the credentials of a browser-extension channel signed data taken from the request itself and stored the result where the requesting user can read it back. A user could therefore obtain a validly signed token containing any claims they choose, which the application accepts as a session, as an organization invitation with a chosen role, as a password reset or as an enterprise provisioning token. A second, narrower route that creates team invitations signs extra fields from the request body in the same way.Show less
-
-
Oct 23, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The Mollie webhook endpoint accepts two independent, attacker-controlled parameters and never verifies that they belong together: * commerceTransactionHash — selects which Craft Commerce transaction is completed *...Show more
The Mollie webhook endpoint accepts two independent, attacker-controlled parameters and never verifies that they belong together: * commerceTransactionHash — selects which Craft Commerce transaction is completed * id — selects which Mollie payment is queried for its status An unauthenticated attacker holding any paid Mollie payment ID from the merchant’s account can pair it with any transaction hash. Commerce queries Mollie, sees status: paid, and marks the target transaction successful for that transaction’s full amount, regardless of how much was actually paid.Show less
-
-
Oct 23, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The Goobi viewer is a web application that allows digitised material to be displayed in a web browser. From version 25.01 to before version 26.05, AuthenticationEndpoint.verifyOpenIdToken builds its verifier as JWT.requi...Show more
The Goobi viewer is a web application that allows digitised material to be displayed in a web browser. From version 25.01 to before version 26.05, AuthenticationEndpoint.verifyOpenIdToken builds its verifier as JWT.require(algorithm).withIssuer(issuer).build() and does not enforce the aud claim during cryptographic validation. The aud check is performed manually afterwards via a single string-equality call, which only handles single-string aud values. In a multi-RP IdP setup, a token whose single-string aud matches the viewer's client ID but was issued for a different relying party passes the check and authenticates the attacker as the token's sub. This issue has been patched in version 26.05.Show less
-
-
Oct 23, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 4.5.2 to before version 4.6.59, praisonai.bots.DiscordApproval approves a pending dangerous tool call when it sees any later non-bot message in the configured Discord...Show more
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 4.5.2 to before version 4.6.59, praisonai.bots.DiscordApproval approves a pending dangerous tool call when it sees any later non-bot message in the configured Discord channel whose text is classified as approval, such as yes. As a result, any user who can post in the configured approval channel can approve a pending high-risk tool call by sending yes after the approval message appears. the same PoV also shows that the Slack and Telegram messaging approval backends have no explicit approver allowlist parameter, but the primary report-grade issue is the Discord backend's unthreaded channel cross-talk: the approving message does not need to be a reply or otherwise request-bound. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.59.Show less
-
-
Oct 23, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
The Essential Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 6.8.7 does not validate the HTML tag setting of some of its widgets before using it to build markup, which could allow users with the author role and above to i...Show more
The Essential Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 6.8.7 does not validate the HTML tag setting of some of its widgets before using it to build markup, which could allow users with the author role and above to inject iframe and form elements into published pages.Show less
-
-
Oct 23, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
N/A· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From 1.87.0 until 1.100.4, 1.101.3, 1.102.2, 1.103.1, and 1.104.0-rc.2, the proxy reuses one cryptographic context for at-rest secrets...Show more
LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From 1.87.0 until 1.100.4, 1.101.3, 1.102.2, 1.103.1, and 1.104.0-rc.2, the proxy reuses one cryptographic context for at-rest secrets and session tokens, allowing an authenticated internal user to have crafted metadata containing a forged administrator credential encrypted and returned by the API-key flow. Replaying that ciphertext as a bearer token causes the proxy to trust the forged proxy administrator identity, permitting administrative access and arbitrary commands through the MCP stdio endpoint. Versions 1.87.0 through 1.90.x require EXPERIMENTAL_UI_LOGIN to be enabled, while versions after 1.91.0 are exploitable in the default configuration. This issue was fixed in LiteLLM 1.100.4, 1.101.3, 1.102.2, 1.103.1, and 1.104.0-rc.2.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 21, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The LatePoint WordPress plugin before 5.7.5 does not validate the client-supplied value that determines how much is charged for a booking against the amounts the service and site actually allow, allowing an unauthenticat...Show more
The LatePoint WordPress plugin before 5.7.5 does not validate the client-supplied value that determines how much is charged for a booking against the amounts the service and site actually allow, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to make the amount due resolve to zero and obtain a confirmed appointment and a recorded order without completing any payment.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 21, 2026
N/A· v4
2.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
The Simple Shopping Cart WordPress plugin before 5.3.3 does not verify submitted product prices against a value only the site owner can set, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to register attacker-chosen...Show more
The Simple Shopping Cart WordPress plugin before 5.3.3 does not verify submitted product prices against a value only the site owner can set, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to register attacker-chosen prices for existing products, which any visitor can then use to add those products to the cart at that price.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 21, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Simple Shopping Cart WordPress plugin before 5.3.3 does not verify that a PayPal payment notification is for a payment received by the site owner's PayPal account in its default configuration, allowing unauthenticate...Show more
The Simple Shopping Cart WordPress plugin before 5.3.3 does not verify that a PayPal payment notification is for a payment received by the site owner's PayPal account in its default configuration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to have their orders marked as paid using a payment made to an account they control.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 21, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Payment Gateway for Telcell WordPress plugin before 2.0.5 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, because the secret used to sign them is empty by default, allowing unauthenticated attacke...Show more
The Payment Gateway for Telcell WordPress plugin before 2.0.5 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, because the secret used to sign them is empty by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a valid notification and mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid. The same handler also marks an attacker-chosen order as failed when given an invalid signature.Show less
-
-
Oct 22, 2026
Oct 21, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
vLLM before 0.31.0 uses a client-supplied multimodal uuid verbatim as cache identity with no consistency check on cache hits, allowing engine crashes. Unauthenticated attackers can desynchronize the P0/P1 processor cache...Show more
vLLM before 0.31.0 uses a client-supplied multimodal uuid verbatim as cache identity with no consistency check on cache hits, allowing engine crashes. Unauthenticated attackers can desynchronize the P0/P1 processor caches to trigger a fatal token-placeholder mismatch, killing the entire serving instance until restarted.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 20, 2026
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Image Packaging System). The supported version that is affected is 11.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with...Show more
Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Image Packaging System). The supported version that is affected is 11.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Solaris. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Solaris accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.1 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N).Show less
1Tox Dev
1Filelock
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 20, 2026
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, SoftFileLock can trust a forged process identifier in a marker that an attacker can modify but cannot remove, allowing an authorized conte...Show more
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, SoftFileLock can trust a forged process identifier in a marker that an attacker can modify but cannot remove, allowing an authorized contender such as another process of the holder's account or root to act as a confused deputy, remove the live marker, and admit another holder. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.Show less
-
-
Oct 20, 2026
Oct 20, 2026
8.6 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability in the firmware upgrade functionality could allow an authenticated attacker to upload a forged firmware upgrade file, potentially compromising the device permanently.
-
-
Oct 19, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
LangBot through 4.11.0 contains a missing authenticity verification vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject forged Lark/Feishu events by skipping signature checks. Attackers knowing a bot UUID can P...Show more
LangBot through 4.11.0 contains a missing authenticity verification vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject forged Lark/Feishu events by skipping signature checks. Attackers knowing a bot UUID can POST fabricated im.message.receive_v1 or card.action.trigger events to drive the LLM pipeline, tools, and approvals as other users.Show less
-
-
Oct 19, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was determined in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard of the component WebSocket Gateway. Ex...Show more
A vulnerability was determined in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard of the component WebSocket Gateway. Executing a manipulation of the argument cwd can lead to origin validation error. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 0.9.0 is sufficient to fix this issue. This patch is called 48fd0bad5adfe76af9736599699d51a5f60019f6. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.Show less
-
-
Oct 20, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
8.5 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
MobaXterm Personal Edition (Portable) 26.4 GA extracts the CygUtils64.plugin file without first verifying its integrity. A local attacker with write permissions on this file can replace the ‘bin/cygwin1.dll’ library cont...Show more
MobaXterm Personal Edition (Portable) 26.4 GA extracts the CygUtils64.plugin file without first verifying its integrity. A local attacker with write permissions on this file can replace the ‘bin/cygwin1.dll’ library contained within it with a malicious library. When the victim opens a Local Shell session or uses a Cygwin-based function, the application extracts the component and loads the tampered library, executing code with the victim’s permissions. Exploitation requires write access to the plugin and does not, in itself, involve privilege escalation.Show less
-
-
Oct 19, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The iPOSpays Payment Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.4.7 does not verify that a payment was actually completed before recording an order as paid, allowing unauthenticated users to mark any unpaid order...Show more
The iPOSpays Payment Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.4.7 does not verify that a payment was actually completed before recording an order as paid, allowing unauthenticated users to mark any unpaid order as paid and to rewrite its total.Show less
-
-
Oct 19, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The Document Gallery WordPress plugin through 5.1.1 does not verify the signature on one of its unauthenticated webhook endpoints when no shared secret has been configured, which is the default state, allowing unauthenti...Show more
The Document Gallery WordPress plugin through 5.1.1 does not verify the signature on one of its unauthenticated webhook endpoints when no shared secret has been configured, which is the default state, allowing unauthenticated users to replace the thumbnail image the site publishes for any document.Show less
-
-
Oct 21, 2026
Oct 19, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in bootc and ostree. Already-staged deployments are finalized without revalidating the deployment's container image against the current containers signature policy. Unsigned OS content staged under a pri...Show more
A flaw was found in bootc and ostree. Already-staged deployments are finalized without revalidating the deployment's container image against the current containers signature policy. Unsigned OS content staged under a prior permissive policy can remain bootable after policy is hardened to reject unsigned images, leading to full host compromise on reboot.Show less