← Back
CWE-327

685 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (685)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
5Alfa
AristaCisco+2 more
1941100 4p Firmware
1100 8p Firmware1100 Firmware+191 more
Jun 17, 2026
May 11, 2021
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
3.3 LOW· v2
An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arb...Show more
An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration.Show less
8Arista
CiscoDebian+5 more
1811100 4p Firmware
1100 8p Firmware1100 Firmware+178 more
Jun 17, 2026
May 11, 2021
N/A· v4
3.5 LOW· v3
2.9 LOW· v2
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices...Show more
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets.Show less
6Arista
CiscoDebian+3 more
1681100 4p Firmware
1100 8p Firmware1100 Firmware+165 more
Jun 17, 2026
May 11, 2021
N/A· v4
2.6 LOW· v3
1.8 LOW· v2
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse th...Show more
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed.Show less
1Ibm
1Spectrum Protect Plus
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 26, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.7 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 200258.
1Ibm
12Collaborative Lifecycle Management
Doors NextEngineering Insights+9 more
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 12, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Jazz Team Server products use weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 192422.
1Relic Project
1Relic
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 7, 2021
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In RELIC before 2020-08-01, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature forgery can occur because certain checks of the padding (and of the first two bytes) are inadequate. NOTE: this requires that a low public exponent (such as 3) is bei...Show more
In RELIC before 2020-08-01, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature forgery can occur because certain checks of the padding (and of the first two bytes) are inadequate. NOTE: this requires that a low public exponent (such as 3) is being used. The product, by default, does not generate RSA keys with such a low number.Show less
5Debian
FedoraprojectNetapp+2 more
6Active Iq Unified Manager
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux+3 more
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 5, 2021
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in Nettle in versions before 3.7.2, where several Nettle signature verification functions (GOST DSA, EDDSA & ECDSA) result in the Elliptic Curve Cryptography point (ECC) multiply function being called wi...Show more
A flaw was found in Nettle in versions before 3.7.2, where several Nettle signature verification functions (GOST DSA, EDDSA & ECDSA) result in the Elliptic Curve Cryptography point (ECC) multiply function being called with out-of-range scalers, possibly resulting in incorrect results. This flaw allows an attacker to force an invalid signature, causing an assertion failure or possible validation. The highest threat to this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.Show less
3Fedoraproject
Libtpms ProjectRedhat
3Enterprise Linux
FedoraLibtpms
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 25, 2021
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
A flaw was found in libtpms in versions before 0.8.2. The commonly used integration of libtpms with OpenSSL contained a vulnerability related to the returned IV (initialization vector) when certain symmetric ciphers were...Show more
A flaw was found in libtpms in versions before 0.8.2. The commonly used integration of libtpms with OpenSSL contained a vulnerability related to the returned IV (initialization vector) when certain symmetric ciphers were used. Instead of returning the last IV it returned the initial IV to the caller, thus weakening the subsequent encryption and decryption steps. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.Show less
1Redhat
13scale Api Management
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 18, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in 3scale’s APIcast gateway that enabled the TLS 1.0 protocol. An attacker could target traffic using this weaker protocol and break its encryption, gaining access to unauthorized information. Version sh...Show more
A flaw was found in 3scale’s APIcast gateway that enabled the TLS 1.0 protocol. An attacker could target traffic using this weaker protocol and break its encryption, gaining access to unauthorized information. Version shipped in Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform is vulnerable to this issue.Show less
1Ibm
1Datapower Gateway
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 12, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM DataPower Gateway 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 189965.
1Ibm
1Security Verify Bridge
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 3, 2021
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Security Verify Bridge uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 196617.
1Coolkit
1Ewelink
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 24, 2021
N/A· v4
4.6 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Weak encryption in the Quick Pairing mode in the eWeLink mobile application (Android application V4.9.2 and earlier, iOS application V4.9.1 and earlier) allows physically proximate attackers to eavesdrop on Wi-Fi credent...Show more
Weak encryption in the Quick Pairing mode in the eWeLink mobile application (Android application V4.9.2 and earlier, iOS application V4.9.1 and earlier) allows physically proximate attackers to eavesdrop on Wi-Fi credentials and other sensitive information by monitoring the Wi-Fi spectrum during the pairing process.Show less
3Openssl
OracleSiemens
8Business Intelligence
Enterprise Manager For Storage ManagementEnterprise Manager Ops Center+5 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 16, 2021
N/A· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when un...Show more
OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x).Show less
1Ibm
1Security Verify Information Queue
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 12, 2021
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 196184.
1Oclean
1Oclean
Jul 9, 2026
Feb 11, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Oclean Mobile Application 2.1.2 communicates with an external website using HTTP so it is possible to eavesdrop the network traffic. The content of HTTP payload is encrypted using XOR with a hardcoded key, which allows f...Show more
Oclean Mobile Application 2.1.2 communicates with an external website using HTTP so it is possible to eavesdrop the network traffic. The content of HTTP payload is encrypted using XOR with a hardcoded key, which allows for the possibility to decode the traffic.Show less
1Hcltechsw
1Onetest Performance
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 4, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
HCL OneTest Performance V9.5, V10.0, V10.1 uses basic authentication which is relatively weak. An attacker could potentially decode the encoded credentials.
1Jetbrains
1Ktor
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 3, 2021
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
In JetBrains Ktor before 1.4.2, weak cipher suites were enabled by default.
1Indutny
1Elliptic
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 2, 2021
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
The package elliptic before 6.5.4 are vulnerable to Cryptographic Issues via the secp256k1 implementation in elliptic/ec/key.js. There is no check to confirm that the public key point passed into the derive function actu...Show more
The package elliptic before 6.5.4 are vulnerable to Cryptographic Issues via the secp256k1 implementation in elliptic/ec/key.js. There is no check to confirm that the public key point passed into the derive function actually exists on the secp256k1 curve. This results in the potential for the private key used in this implementation to be revealed after a number of ECDH operations are performed.Show less
1Rsa
1Archer
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 29, 2021
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Archer before 6.8 P2 (6.8.0.2) is affected by a path exposure vulnerability. A remote authenticated malicious attacker with access to service files may obtain sensitive information to use it in further attacks.
1Xerox
30Workcentre 3655 Firmware
Workcentre 3655i FirmwareWorkcentre 5865 Firmware+27 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 26, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in certain Xerox WorkCentre products. They do not properly encrypt passwords. This affects 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, 7970i, EC7836, and EC78...Show more
An issue was discovered in certain Xerox WorkCentre products. They do not properly encrypt passwords. This affects 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, 7970i, EC7836, and EC7856 devices.Show less