← Back
CWE-311

527 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (527)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Qualcomm
80Ar8035 Firmware
Fastconnect 6200 FirmwareFastconnect 6700 Firmware+77 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 2, 2024
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Cryptographic issue in Automotive while unwrapping the key secs2d and verifying with RPMB data.
2Fedoraproject
Haxx
2Curl
Fedora
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 12, 2023
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
When saving HSTS data to an excessively long file name, curl could end up removing all contents, making subsequent requests using that file unaware of the HSTS status they should otherwise use.
1Ibm
1Infosphere Information Server
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 1, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 265161.
1Huawei
2Emui
Harmonyos
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 8, 2023
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Vulnerability of missing encryption in the card management module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
1Solarwinds
1Network Configuration Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 1, 2023
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager was susceptible to the Exposure of Sensitive Information Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows users with administrative access to SolarWinds Web Console to obtain sensitiv...Show more
The SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager was susceptible to the Exposure of Sensitive Information Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows users with administrative access to SolarWinds Web Console to obtain sensitive information.Show less
1Silabs
1Emberznet Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 26, 2023
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Missing Encryption of Security Keys vulnerability in Silicon Labs Ember ZNet SDK on 32 bit, ARM (SecureVault High modules) allows potential modification or extraction of network credentials stored in flash. This issue...Show more
Missing Encryption of Security Keys vulnerability in Silicon Labs Ember ZNet SDK on 32 bit, ARM (SecureVault High modules) allows potential modification or extraction of network credentials stored in flash. This issue affects Silicon Labs Ember ZNet SDK: 7.3.1 and earlier.Show less
1Silabs
1Openthread Sdk
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 26, 2023
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Missing Encryption of Security Keys vulnerability in Silicon Labs OpenThread SDK on 32 bit, ARM (SecureVault High modules) allows potential modification or extraction of network credentials stored in flash. This issue af...Show more
Missing Encryption of Security Keys vulnerability in Silicon Labs OpenThread SDK on 32 bit, ARM (SecureVault High modules) allows potential modification or extraction of network credentials stored in flash. This issue affects Silicon Labs OpenThread SDK: 2.3.1 and earlier.Show less
1Ibm
1Security Verify Governance
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 23, 2023
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0 does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. IBM X-Force ID: 256020.
1Ibm
1Security Verify Privilege On Premises
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulne...Show more
IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 221963. Show less
1Ibm
1Security Verify Privilege On Premises
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 17, 2023
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulner...Show more
IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 221827.Show less
1Ibm
4Security Directory Integrator
Security Directory ServerSecurity Directory Suite+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 14, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to...Show more
IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. X-Force ID: 228569.Show less
1Qnap
1Qvpn
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 6, 2023
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability has been reported to affect QVPN Device Client. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow local authenticated administrators to read sensitive data via un...Show more
A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability has been reported to affect QVPN Device Client. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow local authenticated administrators to read sensitive data via unspecified vectors. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QVPN Windows 2.2.0.0823 and later Show less
1Schollz
1Croc
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 20, 2023
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An issue was discovered in Croc through 9.6.5. The protocol requires a sender to provide its local IP addresses in cleartext via an ips? message.
1Mozilla
3Firefox
Firefox EsrThunderbird
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 11, 2023
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Push notifications stored on disk in private browsing mode were not being encrypted potentially allowing the leak of sensitive information. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 117, Firefox ESR < 115.2, and Thunderbird <...Show more
Push notifications stored on disk in private browsing mode were not being encrypted potentially allowing the leak of sensitive information. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 117, Firefox ESR < 115.2, and Thunderbird < 115.2.Show less
1Ibm
1Aspera Faspex
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 8, 2023
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacker to gather or persuade a naive user to supply sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 222567.
1Ibm
1Aspera Faspex
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 8, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensi...Show more
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 222576.Show less
1Ibm
1Security Verify Information Queue
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 31, 2023
N/A· v4
3.3 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
IBM Security Verify Information Queue 10.0.4 and 10.0.5 stores sensitive information in plain clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 256013.
1Sick
3Lms500 Firmware
Lms511 FirmwareLms531 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 24, 2023
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A remote unprivileged attacker can intercept the communication via e.g. Man-In-The-Middle, due to the absence of Transport Layer Security (TLS) in the SICK LMS5xx. This lack of encryption in the communication channel can...Show more
A remote unprivileged attacker can intercept the communication via e.g. Man-In-The-Middle, due to the absence of Transport Layer Security (TLS) in the SICK LMS5xx. This lack of encryption in the communication channel can lead to the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. The attacker can exploit this weakness to eavesdrop on the communication between the LMS5xx and the Client, and potentially manipulate the data being transmitted.Show less
1Genians
2Genian Nac
Genian Ztna
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 17, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in Genians Genian NAC V4.0, Genians Genian NAC V5.0, Genians Genian NAC Suite V5.0, Genians Genian ZTNA allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Genian NAC V4....Show more
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in Genians Genian NAC V4.0, Genians Genian NAC V5.0, Genians Genian NAC Suite V5.0, Genians Genian ZTNA allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Genian NAC V4.0: from V4.0.0 through V4.0.155; Genian NAC V5.0: from V5.0.0 through V5.0.42 (Revision 117460); Genian NAC Suite V5.0: from V5.0.0 through V5.0.54; Genian ZTNA: from V6.0.0 through V6.0.15. Show less
1Maximatech
1Portal Executivo
Jun 17, 2026
Aug 16, 2023
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
2.6 LOW· v2
A vulnerability has been found in MaximaTech Portal Executivo 21.9.1.140 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Cookie Handler. The manipulation leads to missing encryptio...Show more
A vulnerability has been found in MaximaTech Portal Executivo 21.9.1.140 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Cookie Handler. The manipulation leads to missing encryption of sensitive data. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-237316. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less