← Back
CWE-295

1,445 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (1,445)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Golang
1Go
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 6, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Certificate verification can panic when a certificate in the chain has an empty DNS name and another certificate in the chain has excluded name constraints. This can crash programs that are either directly verifying X.50...Show more
Certificate verification can panic when a certificate in the chain has an empty DNS name and another certificate in the chain has excluded name constraints. This can crash programs that are either directly verifying X.509 certificate chains, or those that use TLS.Show less
1Golang
1Go
Jul 22, 2026
Mar 6, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applie...Show more
When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered.Show less
1Rustdesk
1Rustdesk
Jun 22, 2026
Mar 5, 2026
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
1Nozominetworks
1Arc
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 4, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
4.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The server certificate was not verified when an Arc agent connected to a Guardian or CMC. A malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept the communication between the Arc agent and the Guardi...Show more
The server certificate was not verified when an Arc agent connected to a Guardian or CMC. A malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept the communication between the Arc agent and the Guardian or CMC. This could result in theft of the client token and sensitive information (such as assets and alerts), impersonation of the server, or injection of spoofed data (such as false asset information or vulnerabilities) into the Guardian or CMC.Show less
1Seppmail
1Seppmail
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 4, 2026
7.8 HIGH· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.1 improperly validates S/MIME certificates issued for email addresses containing whitespaces, allowing signature spoofing.
1Devolutions
1Remote Desktop Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 3, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Improper enforcement of the Disable password saving in vaults setting in the connection entry component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2025.3.30 and earlier allows an authenticated user to persist credentials in...Show more
Improper enforcement of the Disable password saving in vaults setting in the connection entry component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2025.3.30 and earlier allows an authenticated user to persist credentials in vault entries, potentially exposing sensitive information to other users, by creating or editing certain connection types while password saving is disabled.Show less
2Amazon
Aws
3Aws Lc Sys
Aws LibcryptoAws Libcrypto
Jul 15, 2026
Mar 2, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper certificate validation in PKCS7_verify() in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to bypass certificate chain verification when processing PKCS7 objects with multiple signers, except the final signer. Customers...Show more
Improper certificate validation in PKCS7_verify() in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to bypass certificate chain verification when processing PKCS7 objects with multiple signers, except the final signer. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.Show less
1Suse
1Rancher
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 25, 2026
N/A· v4
4.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where using self-signed CA certificates and passing the -skip-verify flag to the Rancher CLI login command without also passing the –cacert flag results in the...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where using self-signed CA certificates and passing the -skip-verify flag to the Rancher CLI login command without also passing the –cacert flag results in the CLI attempting to fetch CA certificates stored in Rancher’s setting cacerts.Show less
1Asustor
1Data Master
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 25, 2026
8.3 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
The FTP Backup on the ADM will not properly strictly enforce TLS certificate verification while connecting to an FTP server using FTPES/FTPS. An improper validated TLS/SSL certificates allows a remote attacker can interc...Show more
The FTP Backup on the ADM will not properly strictly enforce TLS certificate verification while connecting to an FTP server using FTPES/FTPS. An improper validated TLS/SSL certificates allows a remote attacker can intercept network traffic to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, which may intercept, modify, or obtain sensitive information such as authentication credentials and backup data. Affected products and versions include: from ADM 4.1.0 through ADM 4.3.3.ROF1 as well as from ADM 5.0.0 through ADM 5.1.2.RE51.Show less
1Open Emr
1Openemr
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 25, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 7.0.4, OpenEMR's HTTP client wrapper (`oeHttp`/`oeHttpRequest`) disables SSL/TLS certificate verif...Show more
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 7.0.4, OpenEMR's HTTP client wrapper (`oeHttp`/`oeHttpRequest`) disables SSL/TLS certificate verification by default (`verify: false`), making all external HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. This affects communication with government healthcare APIs and user-configurable external services, potentially exposing Protected Health Information (PHI). Version 7.0.4 fixes the issue.Show less
1Ymfe
1Yapi
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 23, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in YMFE yapi v1.12.0. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in the HTTPS agent confi...Show more
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in YMFE yapi v1.12.0. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in the HTTPS agent configuration for Axios requestsShow less
1Jxcore
1Jxm
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 23, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in jxcore jxm master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in HTTPS request options...Show more
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in jxcore jxm master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in HTTPS request options when 'jx_obj.IsSecure' is trueShow less
1Fofolee
1Utools Quickcommand
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 23, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in fofolee uTools-quickcommand 5.0.3.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 23, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in TLS socket options
1Linuxfoundation
1Strimzi Kafka Operator
Jul 15, 2026
Feb 21, 2026
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. In versions 0.49.0 through 0.50.0, when using a custom Cluster or Clients CA with a multistage CA ch...Show more
Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. In versions 0.49.0 through 0.50.0, when using a custom Cluster or Clients CA with a multistage CA chain consisting of multiple CAs, Strimzi incorrectly configures the trusted certificates for mTLS authentication on the internal as well as user-configured listeners. All CAs from the CA chain will be trusted. And users with certificates signed by any of the CAs in the chain will be able to authenticate. This issue affects only users using a custom Cluster or Clients CA with a multistage CA chain consisting of multiple CAs. It does not affect users using the Strimzi-managed Cluster and Clients CAs. It also does not affect users using custom Cluster or Clients CA with only a single CA (i.e., no CA chain with multiple CAs). This issue has been fixed in version 0.50.1. To workaround this issue, instead of providing the full CA chain as the custom CA, users can provide only the single CA that should be used.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
2Strimzi
Strimzi Kafka Operator
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 20, 2026
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. From 0.47.0 to before 0.50.1, when a chain consisting of multiple CA (Certificate Authority) certific...Show more
Strimzi provides a way to run an Apache Kafka cluster on Kubernetes or OpenShift in various deployment configurations. From 0.47.0 to before 0.50.1, when a chain consisting of multiple CA (Certificate Authority) certificates is used in the trusted certificates configuration of a Kafka Connect operand or of the target cluster in the Kafka MirrorMaker 2 operand, all of the certificates that are part of the CA chain will be trusted individually when connecting to the Apache Kafka cluster. Due to this error, the affected operand (Kafka Connect or Kafka MirrorMaker 2) might accept connections to Kafka brokers using server certificates signed by one of the other CAs in the CA chain and not just by the last CA in the chain. This issue is fixed in Strimzi 0.50.1.Show less
1Sigstore
1Cosign
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 19, 2026
N/A· v4
3.7 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during veri...Show more
Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.Show less
1Apache
2Tomcat
Tomcat Native
Jul 15, 2026
Feb 17, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat. When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness ch...Show more
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat. When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed. This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native:  from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected. Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue. Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Tomcat
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 17, 2026
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the...Show more
Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected. Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field. The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate authentication is enforced at the web application. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue.Show less
-
-
Jul 5, 2026
Feb 17, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
An issue in the TLS certification mechanism of Guardian Gryphon v01.06.0006.22 allows attackers to execute commands as root.