← Back
CWE-295

1,445 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (1,445)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
2Golang
Opensuse
2Go
Leap
Nov 21, 2024
Dec 14, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
7.8 HIGH· v2
The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU deni...Show more
The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU denial of service. Go TLS servers accepting client certificates and TLS clients are affected.Show less
1Powermanager
1Kt Mc01507l Z Wave S0 Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Dec 9, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
2.9 LOW· v2
An issue was discovered on KT MC01507L Z-Wave S0 devices. It occurs because HPKP is not implemented. The communication architecture is APP > Server > Controller (HUB) > Node (products which are controlled by HUB). The pr...Show more
An issue was discovered on KT MC01507L Z-Wave S0 devices. It occurs because HPKP is not implemented. The communication architecture is APP > Server > Controller (HUB) > Node (products which are controlled by HUB). The prerequisite is that the attacker is on the same network as the target HUB, and can use IP Changer to change destination IP addresses (of all packets whose destination IP address is Server) to a proxy-server IP address. This allows sniffing of cleartext between Server and Controller. The cleartext command data is transmitted to Controller using the proxy server's fake certificate, and it is able to control each Node of the HUB. Also, by operating HUB in Z-Wave Pairing Mode, it is possible to obtain the Z-Wave network key.Show less
1Ibm
1Qradar Incident Forensics
Nov 21, 2024
Dec 5, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 and 7.3 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-force ID: 133120...Show more
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 and 7.3 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-force ID: 133120.Show less
4Kddi
Ntt TocomoNtttocomo+1 more
4+ Message
+ Message+ Message+1 more
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 15, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Multiple +Message Apps (Softbank +Message App for Android prior to version 10.1.7, Softbank +Message App for iOS prior to version 1.1.23, NTT DOCOMO +Message App for Android prior to version 42.40.2800, NTT DOCOMO +Messa...Show more
Multiple +Message Apps (Softbank +Message App for Android prior to version 10.1.7, Softbank +Message App for iOS prior to version 1.1.23, NTT DOCOMO +Message App for Android prior to version 42.40.2800, NTT DOCOMO +Message App for iOS prior to version 1.1.23, KDDI +Message App for Android prior to version 1.0.6, and KDDI +Message App for iOS prior to version 1.1.23) do not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.Show less
1Apache
1Qpid Proton J
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 13, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes prev...Show more
The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.Show less
2Microsoft
Sennheiser
9Headsetup
Windows 10Windows 7+6 more
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 9, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software dis...Show more
Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.Show less
1F5
1Big Ip Access Policy Manager
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 31, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
6.0 MEDIUM· v2
In some situations on BIG-IP APM 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, or 11.6.0-11.6.3.2, the CRLDP Auth access policy agent may treat revoked certificates as valid when the BIG-IP APM system fails to downl...Show more
In some situations on BIG-IP APM 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, or 11.6.0-11.6.3.2, the CRLDP Auth access policy agent may treat revoked certificates as valid when the BIG-IP APM system fails to download a new Certificate Revocation List.Show less
1Polycom
3Unified Communications Software
Vvx 500 FirmwareVvx 601 Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 24, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Polycom VVX 500 and 601 devices 5.8.0.12848 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging failure to validate X.509 certificates when used with an on-premise inst...Show more
Polycom VVX 500 and 601 devices 5.8.0.12848 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging failure to validate X.509 certificates when used with an on-premise installation with Skype for Business.Show less
1Audiocodes
2440hd Firmware
450hd Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 24, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
AudioCodes 440HD and 450HD devices 3.1.2.89 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging failure to validate X.509 certificates when used with an on-premise inst...Show more
AudioCodes 440HD and 450HD devices 3.1.2.89 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging failure to validate X.509 certificates when used with an on-premise installation with Skype for Business.Show less
1Cisco
1Sd Wan
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 5, 2018
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A vulnerability in the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass certificate validation on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation. An attacke...Show more
A vulnerability in the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass certificate validation on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a system image signed with a crafted certificate to an affected device, bypassing the certificate validation. An exploit could allow an attacker to deploy a crafted system image.Show less
1Cisco
5Vedge 1000 Firmware
Vedge 100 FirmwareVedge 2000 Firmware+2 more
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 5, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in the Zero Touch Provisioning feature of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data by using an invalid certificate. The vulne...Show more
A vulnerability in the Zero Touch Provisioning feature of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data by using an invalid certificate. The vulnerability is due to insufficient certificate validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software.Show less
1Opcfoundation
2Ua .net Legacy
Ua .netstandard
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 3, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Failure to validate certificates in OPC Foundation UA Client Applications communicating without security allows attackers with control over a piece of network infrastructure to decrypt passwords.
1Ibm
1Security Guardium
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 2, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software mig...Show more
IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 141417.Show less
1Postman
1Postman
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 26, 2018
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
An information-disclosure issue was discovered in Postman through 6.3.0. It validates a server's X.509 certificate and presents an error if the certificate is not valid. Unfortunately, the associated HTTPS request data i...Show more
An information-disclosure issue was discovered in Postman through 6.3.0. It validates a server's X.509 certificate and presents an error if the certificate is not valid. Unfortunately, the associated HTTPS request data is sent anyway. Only the response is not displayed. Thus, all contained information of the HTTPS request is disclosed to a man-in-the-middle attacker (for example, user credentials).Show less
2Pivotal Software
Vmware
2Rabbitmq Java Client
Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol
Mar 27, 2025
Sep 14, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic w...Show more
Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic would be able to view data in transit.Show less
1Microsoft
2C Software Development Kit
Java Software Development Kit
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 13, 2018
N/A· v4
5.6 MEDIUM· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
A spoofing vulnerability exists for the Azure IoT Device Provisioning for the C SDK library using the HTTP protocol on Windows platform, aka "Azure IoT SDK Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects C SDK.
1Subsonic
1Music Streamer
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 11, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
The Subsonic Music Streamer application 4.4 for Android has Improper Certificate Validation of the Subsonic server certificate, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain interaction data.
1Sap
1Business One
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 11, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
SAP Business One Android application, version 1.2, does not verify the certificate properly for HTTPS connection. This allows attacker to do MITM attack.
2Apache
Oracle
3Activemq
Enterprise RepositoryFlexcube Private Banking
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 10, 2018
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ serv...Show more
TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.Show less
1Mobyproject
1Moby
Nov 21, 2024
Sep 10, 2018
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a...Show more
An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.Show less