← Back
CWE-294

240 CVEs • Abstraction: Base • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (240)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Meross
1Msg100 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 7, 2021
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
Meross MSG100 devices before 3.2.3 allow an attacker to replay the same data or similar data (e.g., an attacker who sniffs a Close message can transmit an acceptable Open message).
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Oct 6, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A lack of replay attack protection in GUTI REALLOCATION COMMAND message process in Qualcomm modem prior to SMR Oct-2021 Release 1 can lead to remote denial of service on mobile network connection.
1Johnsoncontrols
1Kantech Kt 1 Door Controller Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 15, 2021
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
The KT-1 door controller is susceptible to replay or man-in-the-middle attacks where an attacker can record and replay TCP packets. This issue affects Johnson Controls KT-1 all versions up to and including 3.01
1Dm Fingertool Project
1Dm Fingertool
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 26, 2021
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
5.6 MEDIUM· v2
DM FingerTool v1.19 in the DM PD065 Secure USB is susceptible to improper authentication by a replay attack, allowing local attackers to bypass user authentication and access all features and data on the USB.
1Php Fusion
1Php Fusion
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 2, 2021
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
An issue exists in PHP-Fusion 9.03.50 where session cookies are not deleted once a user logs out, allowing for an attacker to perform a session replay attack and impersonate the victim user.
1Microsoft
8Windows 10
Windows 7Windows 8.1+5 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 8, 2021
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Windows NTLM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
1Nightowlsp
1Smart Doorbell Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 8, 2021
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
Incorrect access control in push notification service in Night Owl Smart Doorbell FW version 20190505 allows remote users to send push notification events via an exposed PNS server. A remote attacker can passively record...Show more
Incorrect access control in push notification service in Night Owl Smart Doorbell FW version 20190505 allows remote users to send push notification events via an exposed PNS server. A remote attacker can passively record push notification events which are sent over an insecure web request. The web service does not authenticate requests, and allows attackers to send an indefinite amount of motion or doorbell events to a user's mobile application by either replaying or deliberately crafting false events.Show less
1Remotemouse
1Emote Remote Mouse
Jun 17, 2026
May 7, 2021
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
An issue was discovered in Emote Remote Mouse through 4.0.0.0. Authentication Bypass can occur via Packet Replay. Remote unauthenticated users can execute arbitrary code via crafted UDP packets even when passwords are se...Show more
An issue was discovered in Emote Remote Mouse through 4.0.0.0. Authentication Bypass can occur via Packet Replay. Remote unauthenticated users can execute arbitrary code via crafted UDP packets even when passwords are set.Show less
1Hpe
1Web Viewpoint
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2021
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Idelji Web ViewPoint Suite, as used in conjunction with HPE NonStop, allows a remote replay attack for T0320L01^ABP through T0320L01^ABZ, T0952L01^AAH through T0952L01^AAR, T0986L01 through T0986L01^AAF, T0665L01^AAP, an...Show more
Idelji Web ViewPoint Suite, as used in conjunction with HPE NonStop, allows a remote replay attack for T0320L01^ABP through T0320L01^ABZ, T0952L01^AAH through T0952L01^AAR, T0986L01 through T0986L01^AAF, T0665L01^AAP, and T0662L01^AAP (L) and T0320H01^ABO through T0320H01^ABY, T0952H01^AAG through T0952H01^AAQ, T0986H01 through T0986H01^AAE, T0665H01^AAO, and T0662H01^AAO (J and H).Show less
1Chainsafe
1Ethermint
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 8, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Cosmos Network Ethermint <= v0.4.0 is affected by a cross-chain transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. Since ethermint uses the same chainIDEpoch and signature schemes with ethereum for compatibility, a veri...Show more
Cosmos Network Ethermint <= v0.4.0 is affected by a cross-chain transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. Since ethermint uses the same chainIDEpoch and signature schemes with ethereum for compatibility, a verified signature in ethereum is still valid in ethermint with the same msg content and chainIDEpoch, which enables "cross-chain transaction replay" attack.Show less
1Chainsafe
1Ethermint
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 8, 2021
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Cosmos Network Ethermint <= v0.4.0 is affected by a transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. If the victim sends a very large nonce transaction, the attacker can replay the transaction through the application.
1Sooil
3Anydana A Firmware
Anydana I FirmwareDiabecare Rs Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 19, 2021
N/A· v4
5.7 MEDIUM· v3
2.9 LOW· v2
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unau...Show more
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay communication sequences via Bluetooth Low Energy.Show less
1Tangro
1Business Workflow
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 18, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
6.4 MEDIUM· v2
Every login in tangro Business Workflow before 1.18.1 generates the same JWT token, which allows an attacker to reuse the token when a session is active. The JWT token does not contain an expiration timestamp.
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 18, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x), P(9.0), and Q(10.0) (Exynos chipsets) software. They allow attackers to conduct RPMB state-change attacks because an unauthorized RPMB write operation can be...Show more
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x), P(9.0), and Q(10.0) (Exynos chipsets) software. They allow attackers to conduct RPMB state-change attacks because an unauthorized RPMB write operation can be replayed, a related issue to CVE-2020-13799. The Samsung ID is SVE-2020-18100 (December 2020).Show less
1Redhat
1Keycloak
Jun 17, 2026
Dec 15, 2020
N/A· v4
4.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0 where an external identity provider, after successful authentication, redirects to a Keycloak endpoint that accepts multiple invocations with the use of the same "state" paramet...Show more
A flaw was found in Keycloak before 13.0.0 where an external identity provider, after successful authentication, redirects to a Keycloak endpoint that accepts multiple invocations with the use of the same "state" parameter. This flaw allows a malicious user to perform replay attacks.Show less
2Fedoraproject
Redhat
4Ceph
Ceph StorageFedora+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 23, 2020
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in the Cephx authentication protocol in versions before 15.2.6 and before 14.2.14, where it does not verify Ceph clients correctly and is then vulnerable to replay attacks in Nautilus. This flaw allows a...Show more
A flaw was found in the Cephx authentication protocol in versions before 15.2.6 and before 14.2.14, where it does not verify Ceph clients correctly and is then vulnerable to replay attacks in Nautilus. This flaw allows an attacker with access to the Ceph cluster network to authenticate with the Ceph service via a packet sniffer and perform actions allowed by the Ceph service. This issue is a reintroduction of CVE-2018-1128, affecting the msgr2 protocol. The msgr 2 protocol is used for all communication except older clients that do not support the msgr2 protocol. The msgr1 protocol is not affected. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, and system availability.Show less
3Linaro
TrustedfirmwareWesterndigital
5Inand Cl Em132 Firmware
Inand Ix Em132 FirmwareInand Ix Em132 Xi Firmware+2 more
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 18, 2020
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Western Digital has identified a security vulnerability in the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) protocol as specified in multiple standards for storage device interfaces, including all versions of eMMC, UFS, and NVMe...Show more
Western Digital has identified a security vulnerability in the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) protocol as specified in multiple standards for storage device interfaces, including all versions of eMMC, UFS, and NVMe. The RPMB protocol is specified by industry standards bodies and is implemented by storage devices from multiple vendors to assist host systems in securing trusted firmware. Several scenarios have been identified in which the RPMB state may be affected by an attacker without the knowledge of the trusted component that uses the RPMB feature.Show less
1Intel
1Trusted Execution Engine
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 12, 2020
N/A· v4
6.8 MEDIUM· v3
4.6 MEDIUM· v2
Authentication bypass by capture-replay in RPMB protocol message authentication subsystem in Intel(R) TXE versions before 4.0.30 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physica...Show more
Authentication bypass by capture-replay in RPMB protocol message authentication subsystem in Intel(R) TXE versions before 4.0.30 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.Show less
1Juuko
1K 808 Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 2, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
10.0 HIGH· v2
In JUUKO K-808, an attacker could specially craft a packet that encodes an arbitrary command, which could be executed on the K-808 (Firmware versions prior to numbers ending ...9A, ...9B, ...9C, etc.).
1Juuko
1K 800 Firmware
Nov 21, 2024
Nov 2, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
10.0 HIGH· v2
JUUKO K-800 (Firmware versions prior to numbers ending ...9A, ...9B, ...9C, etc.) is vulnerable to a replay attack and command forgery, which could allow attackers to replay commands, control the device, view commands, o...Show more
JUUKO K-800 (Firmware versions prior to numbers ending ...9A, ...9B, ...9C, etc.) is vulnerable to a replay attack and command forgery, which could allow attackers to replay commands, control the device, view commands, or cause the device to stop running.Show less