← Back
CWE-285

1,736 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Improper Authorization

The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (1,736)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Openclinic Ga Project
1Openclinic Ga
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 29, 2020
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
An attacker may bypass permission/authorization checks in OpenClinic GA 5.09.02 and 5.89.05b by ignoring the redirect of a permission failure, which may allow unauthorized execution of commands.
1Cisco
2Rv110w Firmware
Rv215w Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 16, 2020
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W and RV215W Series Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to download sensitive information from the device, which coul...Show more
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W and RV215W Series Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to download sensitive information from the device, which could include the device configuration. The vulnerability is due to improper authorization of an HTTP request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing a specific URI on the web-based management interface of the router, but only after any valid user has opened a specific file on the device since the last reboot. A successful exploit would allow the attacker to view sensitive information, which should be restricted.Show less
1Dell
2Powerprotect Data Manager
Powerprotect X400 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 6, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager (PPDM) versions prior to 19.4 and Dell PowerProtect X400 versions prior to 3.2 contain an improper authorization vulnerability. A remote authenticated malicious user may download any file f...Show more
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager (PPDM) versions prior to 19.4 and Dell PowerProtect X400 versions prior to 3.2 contain an improper authorization vulnerability. A remote authenticated malicious user may download any file from the affected PowerProtect virtual machines.Show less
1Prestosql
1Presto
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 30, 2020
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
In Presto before version 337, authenticated users can bypass authorization checks by directly accessing internal APIs. This impacts Presto server installations with secure internal communication configured. This does not...Show more
In Presto before version 337, authenticated users can bypass authorization checks by directly accessing internal APIs. This impacts Presto server installations with secure internal communication configured. This does not affect installations that have not configured secure internal communication, as these installations are inherently insecure. This only affects Presto server installations. This does NOT affect clients such as the CLI or JDBC driver. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 337. Additionally, this issue can be mitigated by blocking network access to internal APIs on the coordinator and workers.Show less
1Auth0
1Express Jwt
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 30, 2020
N/A· v4
9.1 CRITICAL· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
In express-jwt (NPM package) up and including version 5.3.3, the algorithms entry to be specified in the configuration is not being enforced. When algorithms is not specified in the configuration, with the combination of...Show more
In express-jwt (NPM package) up and including version 5.3.3, the algorithms entry to be specified in the configuration is not being enforced. When algorithms is not specified in the configuration, with the combination of jwks-rsa, it may lead to authorization bypass. You are affected by this vulnerability if all of the following conditions apply: - You are using express-jwt - You do not have **algorithms** configured in your express-jwt configuration. - You are using libraries such as jwks-rsa as the **secret**. You can fix this by specifying **algorithms** in the express-jwt configuration. See linked GHSA for example. This is also fixed in version 6.0.0.Show less
1Linuxfoundation
1Ceph
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 22, 2020
N/A· v4
8.0 HIGH· v3
5.2 MEDIUM· v2
An authorization bypass vulnerability was found in Ceph versions 15.2.0 before 15.2.2, where the ceph-mon and ceph-mgr daemons do not properly restrict access, resulting in gaining access to unauthorized resources. This...Show more
An authorization bypass vulnerability was found in Ceph versions 15.2.0 before 15.2.2, where the ceph-mon and ceph-mgr daemons do not properly restrict access, resulting in gaining access to unauthorized resources. This flaw allows an authenticated client to modify the configuration and possibly conduct further attacks.Show less
1Dell
354Chengming 3967 Firmware
Chengming 3977 FirmwareChengming 3980 Firmware+351 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 10, 2020
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Dell Client Consumer and Commercial platforms include an improper authorization vulnerability in the Dell Manageability interface for which an unauthorized actor, with local system access with OS administrator privileges...Show more
Dell Client Consumer and Commercial platforms include an improper authorization vulnerability in the Dell Manageability interface for which an unauthorized actor, with local system access with OS administrator privileges, could bypass the BIOS Administrator authentication to restore BIOS Setup configuration to default values.Show less
1Cisco
1Unified Contact Center Express
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 3, 2020
N/A· v4
7.1 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in the API subsystem of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to change the availability state of any agent. The vulnerability is due to insuffic...Show more
A vulnerability in the API subsystem of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to change the availability state of any agent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authorization enforcement on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to an affected system with valid agent credentials and performing a specific API call with crafted input. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to change the availability state of an agent, potentially causing a denial of service condition.Show less
1Github
1Github
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 3, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An improper access control vulnerability was identified in the GitHub Enterprise Server API that allowed an organization member to escalate permissions and gain access to unauthorized repositories within an organization....Show more
An improper access control vulnerability was identified in the GitHub Enterprise Server API that allowed an organization member to escalate permissions and gain access to unauthorized repositories within an organization. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 2.21 and was fixed in 2.20.9, 2.19.15, and 2.18.20. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.Show less
1Opto22
1Softpac Project
Jun 17, 2026
May 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
Opto 22 SoftPAC Project Version 9.6 and prior. SoftPAC communication does not include any credentials. This allows an attacker with network access to directly communicate with SoftPAC, including, for example, stopping th...Show more
Opto 22 SoftPAC Project Version 9.6 and prior. SoftPAC communication does not include any credentials. This allows an attacker with network access to directly communicate with SoftPAC, including, for example, stopping the service remotely.Show less
1Paloaltonetworks
1Pan Os
Jun 17, 2026
May 13, 2020
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
An improper authorization vulnerability in PAN-OS that mistakenly uses the permissions of local linux users instead of the intended SAML permissions of the account when the username is shared for the purposes of SSO auth...Show more
An improper authorization vulnerability in PAN-OS that mistakenly uses the permissions of local linux users instead of the intended SAML permissions of the account when the username is shared for the purposes of SSO authentication. This can result in authentication bypass and unintended resource access for the user. This issue affects: PAN-OS 7.1 versions earlier than 7.1.26; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than 8.1.13; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than 9.0.6; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than 9.1.1; All versions of PAN-OS 8.0.Show less
1Redhat
1Keycloak
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2020
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A flaw was found in Keycloak version 8.0.2 and 9.0.0, and was fixed in Keycloak version 9.0.1, where a malicious user registers as oneself. The attacker could then use the remove devices form to post different credential...Show more
A flaw was found in Keycloak version 8.0.2 and 9.0.0, and was fixed in Keycloak version 9.0.1, where a malicious user registers as oneself. The attacker could then use the remove devices form to post different credential IDs and possibly remove MFA devices for other users.Show less
1Rsa
1Archer
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2020
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.7 P3 (6.7.0.3), contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the REST API. A remote authenticated malicious Archer user could potentially exploit this vulnerability to view unauthorize...Show more
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.7 P3 (6.7.0.3), contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the REST API. A remote authenticated malicious Archer user could potentially exploit this vulnerability to view unauthorized information.Show less
1Redhat
1Undertow
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 28, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
A file inclusion vulnerability was found in the AJP connector enabled with a default AJP configuration port of 8009 in Undertow version 2.0.29.Final and before and was fixed in 2.0.30.Final. A remote, unauthenticated att...Show more
A file inclusion vulnerability was found in the AJP connector enabled with a default AJP configuration port of 8009 in Undertow version 2.0.29.Final and before and was fixed in 2.0.30.Final. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read web application files from a vulnerable server. In instances where the vulnerable server allows file uploads, an attacker could upload malicious JavaServer Pages (JSP) code within a variety of file types and trigger this vulnerability to gain remote code execution.Show less
1Ge
1Mark Vie Control System
Jun 17, 2026
Apr 7, 2020
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
GE Mark VIe Controller has an unsecured Telnet protocol that may allow a user to create an authenticated session using generic default credentials. GE recommends that users disable the Telnet service.
1Elide
1Elide
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 30, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
In Elide before 4.5.14, it is possible for an adversary to "guess and check" the value of a model field they do not have access to assuming they can read at least one other field in the model. The adversary can construct...Show more
In Elide before 4.5.14, it is possible for an adversary to "guess and check" the value of a model field they do not have access to assuming they can read at least one other field in the model. The adversary can construct filter expressions for an inaccessible field to filter a collection. The presence or absence of models in the returned collection can be used to reconstruct the value of the inaccessible field. Resolved in Elide 4.5.14 and greater.Show less
1Sensiolabs
1Symfony
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 30, 2020
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
In symfony/security-http before versions 4.4.7 and 5.0.7, when a `Firewall` checks access control rule, it iterate overs each rule's attributes and stops as soon as the accessDecisionManager decides to grant access on th...Show more
In symfony/security-http before versions 4.4.7 and 5.0.7, when a `Firewall` checks access control rule, it iterate overs each rule's attributes and stops as soon as the accessDecisionManager decides to grant access on the attribute, preventing the check of next attributes that should have been take into account in an unanimous strategy. The accessDecisionManager is now called with all attributes at once, allowing the unanimous strategy being applied on each attribute. This issue is patched in versions 4.4.7 and 5.0.7.Show less
1Moodle
1Moodle
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 18, 2020
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability was found in Moodle 3.6 before 3.6.7 and 3.7 before 3.7.3, where tokens used to fetch inline atachments in email notifications were not disabled when a user's account was no longer active. Note: to access...Show more
A vulnerability was found in Moodle 3.6 before 3.6.7 and 3.7 before 3.7.3, where tokens used to fetch inline atachments in email notifications were not disabled when a user's account was no longer active. Note: to access files, a user would need to know the file path, and their token.Show less
2Postgresql
Redhat
4Decision Manager
Enterprise LinuxPostgresql+1 more
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 17, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
A flaw was found in PostgreSQL's "ALTER ... DEPENDS ON EXTENSION", where sub-commands did not perform authorization checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw in certain configurations to perform drop objects...Show more
A flaw was found in PostgreSQL's "ALTER ... DEPENDS ON EXTENSION", where sub-commands did not perform authorization checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw in certain configurations to perform drop objects such as function, triggers, et al., leading to database corruption. This issue affects PostgreSQL versions before 12.2, before 11.7, before 10.12 and before 9.6.17.Show less
1Labdigital
1Wagtail 2fa
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 13, 2020
N/A· v4
8.5 HIGH· v3
5.5 MEDIUM· v2
In wagtail-2fa before 1.4.1, any user with access to the CMS can view and delete other users 2FA devices by going to the correct path. The user does not require special permissions in order to do so. By deleting the othe...Show more
In wagtail-2fa before 1.4.1, any user with access to the CMS can view and delete other users 2FA devices by going to the correct path. The user does not require special permissions in order to do so. By deleting the other users device they can disable the target users 2FA devices and potentially compromise the account if they figure out their password. The problem has been patched in version 1.4.1.Show less