The Rox Appointment Booking WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not verify the order total or the selected payment method against its own server-side pricing when creating a booking, allowing unauthenticated attackers to...Show moreThe Rox Appointment Booking WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not verify the order total or the selected payment method against its own server-side pricing when creating a booking, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create confirmed bookings at an arbitrary price and to bypass the site's configured payment-method restrictions.Show less |
The Rox Appointment Booking WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not perform any capability or authorization check when saving its holiday schedule, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the dates the booking sy...Show moreThe Rox Appointment Booking WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not perform any capability or authorization check when saving its holiday schedule, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the dates the booking system treats as unavailable, which can block legitimate bookings or open dates the site owner intended to keep closed.Show less |
The Temporary Login Without Password WordPress plugin before 1.9.9 does not prevent a temporary user from creating an Application Password, and does not revoke one when the temporary access expires or is disabled, allowi...Show moreThe Temporary Login Without Password WordPress plugin before 1.9.9 does not prevent a temporary user from creating an Application Password, and does not revoke one when the temporary access expires or is disabled, allowing the recipient of a temporary login to retain working access to the site over REST and XML-RPC after the administrator believes it has been withdrawn. The retained access carries whatever role was granted, which for the Temporary Login Without Password WordPress plugin before 1.9.9's main use case is Administrator.Show less |
The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 9.8.1 does not verify that a payment was actually taken before recording a booking as paid, trusting the payment gateway named in a public, unauth...Show moreThe Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 9.8.1 does not verify that a payment was actually taken before recording a booking as paid, trusting the payment gateway named in a public, unauthenticated booking request even when the site has never configured that gateway. This lets an unauthenticated attacker obtain confirmed, fully paid appointments and events without any payment being collected.Show less |
A vulnerability allows users authenticating through a federated OIDC provider to obtain the uaa.admin scope despite operators restricting that provider through externalGroupsWhitelist configuration. The issue occurs spec...Show moreA vulnerability allows users authenticating through a federated OIDC provider to obtain the uaa.admin scope despite operators restricting that provider through externalGroupsWhitelist configuration. The issue occurs specifically when an OIDC identity provider uses groupMappingMode: AS_SCOPES with a wildcard externalGroupsWhitelist entry.Show less |
The WPCafe WordPress plugin before 3.0.18 does not correctly restrict access to a set of order-management REST endpoints because their permission callbacks return an incorrect type on failure, allowing unauthenticated u...Show moreThe WPCafe WordPress plugin before 3.0.18 does not correctly restrict access to a set of order-management REST endpoints because their permission callbacks return an incorrect type on failure, allowing unauthenticated users to disclose guest order information and to change the status of, or trash, any order.Show less |
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an authenticated non-administrative user could execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server at the privilege level of the application process by constructing a fl...Show moreIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an authenticated non-administrative user could execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server at the privilege level of the application process by constructing a flow with an MCP Tools component configured to use a local stdio subprocess transport. This bypasses both the LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS server-side controls intended to prevent exactly this class of access. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary command execution, sensitive data exposure (including credentials from the process environment), file system modification, and lateral movement to services reachable from the server.Show less |
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper access control. |
Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary Code...Show moreDell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary Code Execution within the application context.Show less |
Capgo (capgo.app) fails to restrict direct write access to the public.sso_providers table exposed through Supabase PostgREST. A holder of an ordinary Capgo full API key can insert a row with status='active' and enforce_s...Show moreCapgo (capgo.app) fails to restrict direct write access to the public.sso_providers table exposed through Supabase PostgREST. A holder of an ordinary Capgo full API key can insert a row with status='active' and enforce_sso=true, bypassing the intended backend SSO provisioning route (supabase/functions/_backend/private/sso/providers.ts) and its controls: the Enterprise plan requirement, SSO provider creation via the Supabase Management API, DNS TXT domain-ownership verification, the pending_verification → verified → active status transition, and issuance of a trusted provider ID by Supabase Auth. The forged row is trusted by SSO discovery and enforcement logic, including the unauthenticated login preflight endpoint /private/sso/check-domain, which then reports {"has_sso": true, "enforce_sso": true} for domains that were never verified, allowing attacker-controlled SSO enforcement to be asserted for arbitrary domains and disrupting normal login. All versions are affected; at the time of the advisory no patch was available.Show less |
There is an Vulnerability in some HikCentral Access Control versions. Authenticated low-privilege users can invoke API interfaces that their role is not authorized to access. |
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing Access Control in Gallery Image Management in SP Property < 4.1.4 - The gallery management controller tasks lacked authorization checks and CSRF token validation.. Users could...Show moreJoomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing Access Control in Gallery Image Management in SP Property < 4.1.4 - The gallery management controller tasks lacked authorization checks and CSRF token validation.. Users could invoke file removal actions with arbitrary path strings or upload unverified file types.Show less |
The Ultimate Gift Cards for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.2.10 does not reconcile the value of the gift card coupon it issues against the amount actually collected at checkout, allowing unauthenticated users to o...Show moreThe Ultimate Gift Cards for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.2.10 does not reconcile the value of the gift card coupon it issues against the amount actually collected at checkout, allowing unauthenticated users to obtain store credit worth more than they paid.Show less |
In RuoYi-Cloud-Plus <= 2.6.2 in the ruoyi-workflow module, multiple core task APIs in FlwTaskController lack permission annotations, and the Service layer does not verify whether the current user is the task handler/rela...Show moreIn RuoYi-Cloud-Plus <= 2.6.2 in the ruoyi-workflow module, multiple core task APIs in FlwTaskController lack permission annotations, and the Service layer does not verify whether the current user is the task handler/related user. Authenticated low-privileged remote attackers can read sensitive workflow task details (/task/getTask/{taskId}) and trigger unauthorized workflow executions (/task/startWorkFlow).Show less |
alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. An Improper Access Control issue in versions prior to 2.0-M5-2605 allows an organization owner to read system-level...Show morealf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. An Improper Access Control issue in versions prior to 2.0-M5-2605 allows an organization owner to read system-level configuration secrets through organization/event scoped "single configuration" endpoints. The affected endpoints require organization or event ownership, but they accept an arbitrary configuration key and then return the first matching value from a lookup that includes system-level configuration. As a result, an organization owner can retrieve secrets intended to be administrator-only, including the system API key when it is configured. Version 2.0-M5-2605 fixes the issue.Show less |
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of CPPM guest account management services could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate account settings. Successful exploitation could allow an attack...Show moreA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of CPPM guest account management services could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate account settings. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to extend network access beyond policy limits, leading to unauthorized prolonged use of network resources.Show less |
Snipe-IT versions before 8.7.0 contain a broken access control vulnerability in AssetModelPolicy where the files() method cascades from assets.files permission, allowing authenticated users to upload and delete file atta...Show moreSnipe-IT versions before 8.7.0 contain a broken access control vulnerability in AssetModelPolicy where the files() method cascades from assets.files permission, allowing authenticated users to upload and delete file attachments on Asset Model records without the required models.files permission. Attackers with only assets.files permission can mutate shared model file attachments across company boundaries and bypass the dedicated models.files permission intended to restrict file management on the shared Asset Model catalog.Show less |
The WP Travel WordPress plugin before 12.0.2 does not properly verify that the requester is authorized to modify the targeted booking on one branch of its bank-deposit handler, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who k...Show moreThe WP Travel WordPress plugin before 12.0.2 does not properly verify that the requester is authorized to modify the targeted booking on one branch of its bank-deposit handler, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who knows the target customer's email address to reset that customer's booking payment to an unpaid state and wipe its stored deposit-reconciliation data.Show less |
Improper access control in Watch Plugin prior to Android Watch 17 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. |
Improper access control in Collection prior to version 1.0.1.14 in Android 15 and 2.0.02.7 in Android 16 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. |