← Back
CWE-20

12,973 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (12,973)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
4.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium s...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in COOP in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium se...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in COOP in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
3.1 LOW· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Persistent Cache in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page....Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Persistent Cache in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
4.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform arbitrary read/write via a crafted HTML page. (Chr...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform arbitrary read/write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Mobile in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a local attacker to inject arbitrary scripts or HTML (UXSS) via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium securi...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Mobile in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a local attacker to inject arbitrary scripts or HTML (UXSS) via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
4.2 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Popup Blocker in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Popup Blocker in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 10, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: Is not a vulnerability, is a feature bug.
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient data validation in InterestGroups in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (...Show more
Insufficient data validation in InterestGroups in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient data validation in DevTools in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
May 6, 2026
N/A· v4
8.3 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a craf...Show more
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)Show less
1Anthropic
1Claude Code
Jul 24, 2026
May 5, 2026
7.7 HIGH· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
In versions 2.1.63 through 2.1.83 of Claude Code, the folder trust determination logic used the git worktree commondir file without validating its contents. An attacker could craft a malicious repository with a commondir...Show more
In versions 2.1.63 through 2.1.83 of Claude Code, the folder trust determination logic used the git worktree commondir file without validating its contents. An attacker could craft a malicious repository with a commondir file pointing to a path the victim had previously trusted, causing Claude Code to bypass its trust confirmation dialog and immediately execute hooks defined in `.claude/settings.json`. Exploitation requires the victim to clone the malicious repository and run Claude Code within it, and the attacker must know or guess a path the victim had already trusted. This issue has been fixed in version 2.1.84.Show less
1Sandboxie Plus
1Sandboxie
Jul 25, 2026
May 5, 2026
8.2 HIGH· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Sandboxie is an open source sandbox-based isolation software for Windows. In versions 1.17.2 and earlier, a local denial of service vulnerability exists in the Sandboxie kernel driver. An unprivileged process running ins...Show more
Sandboxie is an open source sandbox-based isolation software for Windows. In versions 1.17.2 and earlier, a local denial of service vulnerability exists in the Sandboxie kernel driver. An unprivileged process running inside a Standard Sandbox can send a malformed IOCTL to the \Device\SandboxieDriverApi driver, triggering an immediate kernel crash (BSOD). The vulnerability affects the Standard Sandbox configuration both with and without dropped administrator privileges, but does not affect the Security Hardened Sandbox configuration. This issue has been fixed in version 1.17.3. Users who cannot update can use the Security Hardened Sandbox configuration as a workaround.Show less
1Papercut
2Papercut Mf
Papercut Ng
Jun 17, 2026
May 5, 2026
4.1 MEDIUM· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A race condition exists in PaperCut MF when processing badge-swipe data from certain HP multifunction devices. Under specific network conditions involving dropped packets and out-of-order sequence counters, the server ma...Show more
A race condition exists in PaperCut MF when processing badge-swipe data from certain HP multifunction devices. Under specific network conditions involving dropped packets and out-of-order sequence counters, the server may incorrectly process fragmented data chunks. If a sequence reset notification fails to reach the server, the server may reject the initial data chunk while erroneously accepting subsequent chunks before a connection reset completes. This leads to the registration of a truncated badge ID string. While this typically results in an authentication failure, the vulnerability is compounded in environments utilizing custom badge-ID post-processing scripts. In such configurations, the truncated string may be transformed into a valid ID belonging to a different user, leading to unauthorized session establishment (Incorrect User Login) on the device.Show less
1Apache
1Polaris
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
9.4 CRITICAL· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells P...Show more
In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) bypasses the commit-time branch that is supposed to revalidate storage locations. The full persisted / credential-vending variant requires the affected catalog to have `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=true`, with `allowedLocations` broad enough to include the attacker-chosen target. `allowedLocations` is the admin-configured allowlist of storage paths that the catalog is allowed to use. Public project materials suggest that this flag is a real supported compatibility / layout mode, not just a contrived lab-only prerequisite. In that configuration, a user who can change table settings can cause Apache Polaris itself to write new table metadata to an attacker-chosen reachable storage location before the intended location-validation branch runs. If the later concrete-path validation also accepts that location, Polaris persists the resulting metadata path into stored table state. Later table-load and credential APIs can then return temporary cloud-storage credentials for the same location without revalidating it. In plain terms, Polaris can later hand out temporary storage access for the same attacker-chosen area. That attacker-chosen area does not need to be limited to the poisoned table's own files. If it is a broader storage prefix, another table's prefix, or, depending on configuration or provider behavior, even a bucket/container root, the resulting disclosure or corruption scope can extend to any data and metadata Polaris can reach there. The practical consequences are therefore similar to the staged-create credential-vending issue already discussed: data and metadata reachable in that storage scope can be exposed and, if write-capable credentials are later issued, modified, corrupted, or removed. Even before that later credential step, Polaris itself performs the metadata write to the unchecked location. So the core issue is not only later credential vending. The primary defect is that Polaris skips its intended location checks before performing a security- sensitive metadata write when only `write.metadata.path` changes. When `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=false`, current code review suggests the later `updateTableLike(...)` validation usually rejects out-of-tree metadata locations before the unsafe path is persisted. That may reduce the persisted / credential-vending variant, but it does not prevent the underlying defect: Polaris still skips the intended pre-write location check when only `write.metadata.path` changes.Show less
1Apache
1Polaris
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
9.4 CRITICAL· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
In plain terms, Apache Polaris is supposed to issue short-lived GCS credentials that only work for one table's files, but a crafted namespace or table name can cause those credentials to work across the configured bucket...Show more
In plain terms, Apache Polaris is supposed to issue short-lived GCS credentials that only work for one table's files, but a crafted namespace or table name can cause those credentials to work across the configured bucket instead. Apache Polaris builds Google Cloud Storage downscoped credentials by creating a Credential Access Boundary (CAB) with CEL conditions that are intended to restrict access to the requested table's storage path. The relevant CEL string is built from the bucket name and the table path. That table path is derived from namespace and table identifiers. In current code, that path appears to be inserted into the CEL expression without escaping. As a result, a namespace or table identifier containing a single quote and other URI-safe CEL fragments can break out of the intended quoted string and change the meaning of the CEL condition. In private testing against Polaris 1.4.0 on real Google Cloud Storage, it was confirmed that Polaris accepted a crafted identifier and returned delegated GCS credentials whose CEL path restriction had effectively collapsed. Those delegated credentials could then: - list another table's object prefix; - read another table's metadata control file (Iceberg metadata JSON); - create and delete an object under another table's object prefix; - and also list, read, create, and delete objects under an unrelated external prefix in the same bucket that was not part of any table path. That last point is important. The issue is not limited to "another table". In the confirmed setup, once Apache Polaris returned credentials for the crafted table, the path restriction inside the configured bucket was effectively gone. The practical effect is that temporary credentials for one crafted table can be broader than the table Polaris was asked to authorize, and can become effectively bucket-wide within the configured bucket. The current GCS testing used a Polaris principal with broad catalog privileges for setup. A separate least-privilege Polaris RBAC variant has not yet been tested on GCS. However, the storage-credential broadening behavior itself has been confirmed on GCS.Show less
1Apache
1Polaris
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
9.4 CRITICAL· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Polaris accepts literal `*` characters in namespace and table names. When it later builds temporary S3 access policies for delegated table access, those same characters appear to be reused unescaped in S3 IAM reso...Show more
Apache Polaris accepts literal `*` characters in namespace and table names. When it later builds temporary S3 access policies for delegated table access, those same characters appear to be reused unescaped in S3 IAM resource patterns and `s3:prefix` conditions. In S3 IAM policy matching, `*` is treated as a wildcard rather than as ordinary text. That means temporary credentials issued for one crafted table can match the storage path of a different table. In private testing against Polaris 1.4.0 using Polaris' AWS S3 temporary- credential path on both MinIO and real AWS S3, credentials returned for crafted tables such as `f*.t1`, `f*.*`, `*.*`, and `foo.*` could reach other tables' S3 locations. The confirmed behavior includes: - reading another table's metadata control file ([Iceberg metadata JSON]); - listing another table's exact S3 table prefix ([table prefix]); - and, when write delegation was returned for the crafted table, creating and deleting an object under another table's exact S3 table prefix. A control case using ordinary different names did not allow the same cross-table access. A least-privilege AWS S3 variant was also confirmed in which the attacker principal had no Polaris permissions on the victim table and only the minimal permissions required to create and use a crafted wildcard table (namespace-scoped `TABLE_CREATE` and `TABLE_WRITE_DATA` on `*`). In that setup, direct Polaris access to `foo.t1` remained forbidden, but the attacker could still create and load `*.*`, receive delegated S3 credentials, and use those credentials to list, read, create, and delete objects under `foo.t1`. In Iceberg, the metadata JSON file is a control file: it tells readers which data files belong to the table, which snapshots exist, and which table version to read. So unauthorized access to it is already a meaningful confidentiality problem. The confirmed write-capable variant means the issue is not limited to disclosure.Show less
1Apache
1Polaris
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
9.4 CRITICAL· v4
9.9 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Apache Polaris can issue broad temporary ("vended") storage credentials during staged table creation before the effective table location has been validated or durably reserved. Those temporary credentials are meant to l...Show more
Apache Polaris can issue broad temporary ("vended") storage credentials during staged table creation before the effective table location has been validated or durably reserved. Those temporary credentials are meant to limit the scope of accessible table data and metadata, but this scope limitation becomes attacker- directed because the attacker can choose a reachable target location. In the confirmed variant, if the caller supplies a custom `location` during stage create and requests credential vending, Apache Polaris uses that location to construct delegated storage credentials immediately. The stage-create path itself neither runs the normal location validation nor the overlap checks before those credentials are issued. Closely related to that, the staged-create flow also accepts `write.data.path` / `write.metadata.path` in the request properties and feeds those location overrides into the same effective table location set used for credential vending. Those fields are secondary to the main custom-`location` exploit, but they are still attacker-influenced location inputs that should be validated before any credentials are issued.Show less
1Frrouting
1Frrouting
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Missing input validation in the MP_REACH_NLRI component of FRRouting (FRR) stable/10.0 to stable/10.6 allows authenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted UPDATE message.
-
-
Jun 17, 2026
May 4, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
6.3 MEDIUM· v3
6.5 MEDIUM· v2
A security vulnerability has been detected in MindsDB up to 26.01. Affected is the function pickle.loads of the component Pickle Handler. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack is possible to be carried ou...Show more
A security vulnerability has been detected in MindsDB up to 26.01. Affected is the function pickle.loads of the component Pickle Handler. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.Show less