← Back
CWE-20

13,740 CVEs • Abstraction: Class • Likelihood of Exploit: High

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (13,740)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042.Show less
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1043.Show less
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.Show less
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.Show less
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.Show less
1Microsoft
3Windows Server 2008
Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2016
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.7 HIGH· v2
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Exe...Show more
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.Show less
1Microsoft
5Lync
Sharepoint Enterprise ServerSharepoint Foundation+2 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server and Skype for Business Server improperly handle OAuth token validation. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could bypas...Show more
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server and Skype for Business Server improperly handle OAuth token validation. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could bypass authentication and achieve improper access. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to modify the token. The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft SharePoint Server and Skype for Business Server validate tokens.Show less
1Siemens
13Opcenter Execution Discrete
Opcenter Execution FoundationOpcenter Execution Process+10 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability has been identified in Opcenter Execution Discrete (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Execution Foundation (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Execution Process (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Intelligence (All...Show more
A vulnerability has been identified in Opcenter Execution Discrete (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Execution Foundation (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Execution Process (All versions < V3.2), Opcenter Intelligence (All versions < V3.3), Opcenter Quality (All versions < V11.3), Opcenter RD&L (V8.0), SIMATIC IT LMS (All versions < V2.6), SIMATIC IT Production Suite (All versions < V8.0), SIMATIC Notifier Server for Windows (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo (All versions < V3.0 SP1), SIMATIC STEP 7 (TIA Portal) V15 (All versions < V15.1 Update 5), SIMATIC STEP 7 (TIA Portal) V16 (All versions < V16 Update 2), SIMOCODE ES V15.1 (All versions < V15.1 Update 4), SIMOCODE ES V16 (All versions < V16 Update 1), Soft Starter ES V15.1 (All versions < V15.1 Update 3), Soft Starter ES V16 (All versions < V16 Update 1). Sending a specially crafted packet to the affected service could cause a partial remote denial-of-service, that would cause the service to restart itself.Show less
6Canonical
DebianFedoraproject+3 more
6Debian Linux
FedoraLeap+3 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 14, 2020
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
The bubblewrap sandbox of WebKitGTK and WPE WebKit, prior to 2.28.3, failed to properly block access to CLONE_NEWUSER and the TIOCSTI ioctl. CLONE_NEWUSER could potentially be used to confuse xdg-desktop-portal, which al...Show more
The bubblewrap sandbox of WebKitGTK and WPE WebKit, prior to 2.28.3, failed to properly block access to CLONE_NEWUSER and the TIOCSTI ioctl. CLONE_NEWUSER could potentially be used to confuse xdg-desktop-portal, which allows access outside the sandbox. TIOCSTI can be used to directly execute commands outside the sandbox by writing to the controlling terminal's input buffer, similar to CVE-2017-5226.Show less
1Citrix
5Application Delivery Controller Firmware
Gateway FirmwareGateway Plug In For Linux+2 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 10, 2020
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
Improper input validation in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 13.0-58.30, 12.1-57.18, 12.0-63.21, 11.1-64.14 and 10.5-70.18 and Citrix SDWAN WAN-OP versions before 11.1.1a, 11.0.3d and 10.2.7 resulting in li...Show more
Improper input validation in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 13.0-58.30, 12.1-57.18, 12.0-63.21, 11.1-64.14 and 10.5-70.18 and Citrix SDWAN WAN-OP versions before 11.1.1a, 11.0.3d and 10.2.7 resulting in limited information disclosure to low privileged users.Show less
1Citrix
2Application Delivery Controller Firmware
Netscaler Gateway Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 10, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Improper input validation in Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway versions before 11.1-63.9 and 12.0-62.10 allows unauthenticated users to perform a denial of service attack.
1Huawei
1P30 Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 10, 2020
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
HUAWEI P30 smartphone with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper input verification vulnerability. An attribution in a module is not set correctly and some verification is lacked. Attackers with...Show more
HUAWEI P30 smartphone with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper input verification vulnerability. An attribution in a module is not set correctly and some verification is lacked. Attackers with local access can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious fragment. This may lead to user information leak.Show less
1Raonwiz
1Raon K Upload
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 10, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
RAONWIZ v2018.0.2.50 and eariler versions contains a vulnerability that could allow remote files to be downloaded and excuted by lack of validation to file extension, witch can used as remote-code-excution attacks by hac...Show more
RAONWIZ v2018.0.2.50 and eariler versions contains a vulnerability that could allow remote files to be downloaded and excuted by lack of validation to file extension, witch can used as remote-code-excution attacks by hackers File download & execution vulnerability in ____COMPONENT____ of RAONWIZ RAON KUpload allows ____ATTACKER/ATTACK____ to cause ____IMPACT____. This issue affects: RAONWIZ RAON KUpload 2018.0.2.50 versions prior to 2018.0.2.51 on Windows.Show less
1Huawei
50Ar120 S Firmware
Ar1200 S FirmwareAr1200 Firmware+47 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 8, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to th...Show more
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to the insufficient verification of the packets, successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause buffer overflow and dead loop, leading to DoS condition. Affected products can be found in https://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-sip-en.Show less
1Huawei
50Ar120 S Firmware
Ar1200 S FirmwareAr1200 Firmware+47 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 8, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to th...Show more
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to the insufficient verification of the packets, successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause buffer overflow and dead loop, leading to DoS condition. Affected products can be found in https://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-sip-en.Show less
1Huawei
50Ar120 S Firmware
Ar1200 S FirmwareAr1200 Firmware+47 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 8, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to th...Show more
The SIP module of some Huawei products have a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability. A remote attacker could exploit these three vulnerabilities by sending the specially crafted messages to the affected device. Due to the insufficient verification of the packets, successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause buffer overflow and dead loop, leading to DoS condition. Affected products can be found in https://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-sip-en.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 7, 2020
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
7.1 HIGH· v2
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with Q(10.0) software. Attackers can trigger an out-of-bounds access and device reset via a 4K wallpaper image because ImageProcessHelper mishandles boundary checks. The...Show more
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with Q(10.0) software. Attackers can trigger an out-of-bounds access and device reset via a 4K wallpaper image because ImageProcessHelper mishandles boundary checks. The Samsung ID is SVE-2020-18056 (July 2020).Show less
1Solarwinds
1Serv U Ftp Server
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 5, 2020
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
7.5 HIGH· v2
SolarWinds Serv-U FTP server before 15.2.1 does not validate an argument path.
3Debian
FedoraprojectLibraw
3Debian Linux
FedoraLibraw
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 2, 2020
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
LibRaw before 0.20-RC1 lacks a thumbnail size range check. This affects decoders/unpack_thumb.cpp, postprocessing/mem_image.cpp, and utils/thumb_utils.cpp. For example, malloc(sizeof(libraw_processed_image_t)+T.tlength)...Show more
LibRaw before 0.20-RC1 lacks a thumbnail size range check. This affects decoders/unpack_thumb.cpp, postprocessing/mem_image.cpp, and utils/thumb_utils.cpp. For example, malloc(sizeof(libraw_processed_image_t)+T.tlength) occurs without validating T.tlength.Show less
3Apache
DebianFedoraproject
3Debian Linux
FedoraGuacamole
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 2, 2020
N/A· v4
4.4 MEDIUM· v3
1.2 LOW· v2
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older do not properly validate datareceived from RDP servers via static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, specially-craftedPDUs could result in discl...Show more
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older do not properly validate datareceived from RDP servers via static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, specially-craftedPDUs could result in disclosure of information within the memory ofthe guacd process handling the connection.Show less