← Back
CWE-203

751 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Observable Discrepancy

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor, which exposes security-relevant information about the state of the product, such as whether a particular operation was successful or not.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (751)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Broadcom
2Ca Identity Governance
Ca Identity Suite Virtual Appliance
Nov 21, 2024
Oct 17, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
CA Technologies Identity Governance 12.6, 14.0, 14.1, and 14.2 and CA Identity Suite Virtual Appliance 14.0, 14.1, and 14.2 provide telling error messages that may allow remote attackers to enumerate account names.
1Fortinet
1Fortios
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 5, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack on RSA PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0...Show more
A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack on RSA PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under VIP SSL feature when CPx being used.Show less
1Fortinet
1Fortios
Jun 17, 2026
Sep 5, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack on RSA PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0...Show more
A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack on RSA PKCS #1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under SSL Deep Inspection feature when CPx being used.Show less
3Canonical
DebianSamba
3Debian Linux
SambaUbuntu Linux
Nov 21, 2024
Aug 22, 2018
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
The Samba Active Directory LDAP server was vulnerable to an information disclosure flaw because of missing access control checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to extract confidential attribute values usi...Show more
The Samba Active Directory LDAP server was vulnerable to an information disclosure flaw because of missing access control checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to extract confidential attribute values using LDAP search expressions. Samba versions before 4.6.16, 4.7.9 and 4.8.4 are vulnerable.Show less
1Intel
8Core I3
Core I5Core I7+5 more
May 29, 2026
Aug 14, 2018
N/A· v4
5.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.7 MEDIUM· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and address translations may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache to an attacker with local user access via a terminal pa...Show more
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and address translations may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache to an attacker with local user access via a terminal page fault and a side-channel analysis.Show less
1Intel
30Core I3
Core I5Core I7+27 more
May 29, 2026
Aug 14, 2018
N/A· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
5.4 MEDIUM· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and Intel software guard extensions (Intel SGX) may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache from an enclave to an attacker w...Show more
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and Intel software guard extensions (Intel SGX) may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache from an enclave to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.Show less
5Canonical
DebianGnupg+2 more
8Ansible Tower
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux Desktop+5 more
Nov 21, 2024
Jun 13, 2018
N/A· v4
4.7 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
Libgcrypt before 1.7.10 and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures that can be mitigated through the use of blinding during the signing process in the _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign functi...Show more
Libgcrypt before 1.7.10 and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures that can be mitigated through the use of blinding during the signing process in the _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign function in cipher/ecc-ecdsa.c, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host.Show less
2Arm
Intel
199Atom C
Atom EAtom Z+196 more
Nov 21, 2024
May 22, 2018
N/A· v4
5.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.7 MEDIUM· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and that perform speculative reads of system registers may allow unauthorized disclosure of system parameters to an attacker with local user access via a side-...Show more
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and that perform speculative reads of system registers may allow unauthorized disclosure of system parameters to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Rogue System Register Read (RSRE), Variant 3a.Show less
12Arm
CanonicalDebian+9 more
282Atom C
Atom EAtom X5 E3930+279 more
May 29, 2026
May 22, 2018
N/A· v4
5.5 MEDIUM· v3
2.1 LOW· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an atta...Show more
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4.Show less
1Broadcom
1Symantec Intelligencecenter
Nov 21, 2024
May 17, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Symantec IntelligenceCenter 3.3 is vulnerable to the Return of the Bleichenbacher Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. A remote attacker, who has captured a pre-recorded SSL session inspected by SSLV, can establish large number...Show more
Symantec IntelligenceCenter 3.3 is vulnerable to the Return of the Bleichenbacher Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. A remote attacker, who has captured a pre-recorded SSL session inspected by SSLV, can establish large numbers of crafted SSL connections to the target and obtain the session keys required to decrypt the pre-recorded SSL session.Show less
1Broadcom
1Ssl Visibility Appliance
Nov 21, 2024
May 17, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Symantec SSL Visibility (SSLV) 3.8.4FC, 3.10 prior to 3.10.4.1, 3.11, and 3.12 prior to 3.12.2.1 are vulnerable to the Return of the Bleichenbacher Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. All affected SSLV versions act as weak ora...Show more
Symantec SSL Visibility (SSLV) 3.8.4FC, 3.10 prior to 3.10.4.1, 3.11, and 3.12 prior to 3.12.2.1 are vulnerable to the Return of the Bleichenbacher Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. All affected SSLV versions act as weak oracles according the oracle classification used in the ROBOT research paper. A remote attacker, who has captured a pre-recorded SSL session inspected by SSLV, can establish multiple millions of crafted SSL connections to the target and obtain the session keys required to decrypt the pre-recorded SSL session.Show less
1Synacor
1Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Nov 21, 2024
May 10, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
mailboxd in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.8; 8.7 before 8.7.11.Patch3; and 8.6 allows Account Enumeration by leveraging a Discrepancy between the "HTTP 404 - account is not active" and "HTTP 401 - must authen...Show more
mailboxd in Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.8 before 8.8.8; 8.7 before 8.7.11.Patch3; and 8.6 allows Account Enumeration by leveraging a Discrepancy between the "HTTP 404 - account is not active" and "HTTP 401 - must authenticate" errors.Show less
1Sinatrarb
1Rack Protection
Nov 21, 2024
Mar 7, 2018
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Sinatra rack-protection versions 1.5.4 and 2.0.0.rc3 and earlier contains a timing attack vulnerability in the CSRF token checking that can result in signatures can be exposed. This attack appear to be exploitable via ne...Show more
Sinatra rack-protection versions 1.5.4 and 2.0.0.rc3 and earlier contains a timing attack vulnerability in the CSRF token checking that can result in signatures can be exposed. This attack appear to be exploitable via network connectivity to the ruby application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.5.5 and 2.0.0.Show less
1Cisco
1Mobility Services Engine
Nov 21, 2024
Feb 8, 2018
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in the RADIUS authentication module of Cisco Policy Suite could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to determine whether a subscriber username is valid. The vulnerability occurs because the Cisco Po...Show more
A vulnerability in the RADIUS authentication module of Cisco Policy Suite could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to determine whether a subscriber username is valid. The vulnerability occurs because the Cisco Policy Suite RADIUS server component returns different authentication failure messages based on the validity of usernames. An attacker could use these messages to determine whether a valid subscriber username has been identified. The attacker could use this information in subsequent attacks against the system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg47830.Show less
13Arm
CanonicalDebian+10 more
308Atom C
Atom EAtom X3+305 more
May 28, 2026
Jan 4, 2018
N/A· v4
5.6 MEDIUM· v3
4.7 MEDIUM· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.
7Arm
CanonicalDebian+4 more
220Atom C
Atom EAtom X3+217 more
May 6, 2025
Jan 4, 2018
N/A· v4
5.6 MEDIUM· v3
1.9 LOW· v2
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.
1Cisco
5Adaptive Security Appliance 5505 Firmware
Adaptive Security Appliance 5510 FirmwareAdaptive Security Appliance 5520 Firmware+2 more
May 13, 2026
Dec 15, 2017
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A vulnerability in the TLS protocol implementation of legacy Cisco ASA 5500 Series (ASA 5505, 5510, 5520, 5540, and 5550) devices could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information, aka a Ret...Show more
A vulnerability in the TLS protocol implementation of legacy Cisco ASA 5500 Series (ASA 5505, 5510, 5520, 5540, and 5550) devices could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information, aka a Return of Bleichenbacher's Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. An attacker could iteratively query a server running a vulnerable TLS stack implementation to perform cryptanalytic operations that may allow decryption of previously captured TLS sessions. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg97652.Show less
1Radware
1Alteon Firmware
May 13, 2026
Dec 13, 2017
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Radware Alteon devices with a firmware version between 31.0.0.0-31.0.3.0 are vulnerable to an adaptive-chosen ciphertext attack ("Bleichenbacher attack"). This allows an attacker to decrypt observed traffic that has been...Show more
Radware Alteon devices with a firmware version between 31.0.0.0-31.0.3.0 are vulnerable to an adaptive-chosen ciphertext attack ("Bleichenbacher attack"). This allows an attacker to decrypt observed traffic that has been encrypted with the RSA cipher and to perform other private key operations.Show less
3Arubanetworks
SiemensWolfssl
3Instant
Scalance W1750d FirmwareWolfssl
May 13, 2026
Dec 13, 2017
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
wolfSSL prior to version 3.12.2 provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable wolfSSL application. This vu...Show more
wolfSSL prior to version 3.12.2 provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable wolfSSL application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT."Show less
1Bouncycastle
1Bc Java
May 13, 2026
Dec 13, 2017
N/A· v4
5.9 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is...Show more
BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT."Show less