O-RAN RIC I-Release e2mgr lacks array size checks in E2nodeConfigUpdateNotificationHandler. |
O-RAN RIC I-Release e2mgr lacks array size checks in RicServiceUpdateHandler. |
Open Networking Foundation SD-RAN ONOS onos-lib-go 0.10.25 allows an index out-of-range condition in putBitString. |
FFmpeg version n6.1 was discovered to contain an improper validation of array index vulnerability in libavcodec/cbs_h266_syntax_template.c. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause undefined behavior within the appli...Show moreFFmpeg version n6.1 was discovered to contain an improper validation of array index vulnerability in libavcodec/cbs_h266_syntax_template.c. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause undefined behavior within the application.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: fix incorrect mpc_combine array size
[why]
MAX_SURFACES is per stream, while MAX_PLANES is per asic. The
mpc_combine is an array that...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: fix incorrect mpc_combine array size
[why]
MAX_SURFACES is per stream, while MAX_PLANES is per asic. The
mpc_combine is an array that records all the planes per asic. Therefore
MAX_PLANES should be used as the array size. Using MAX_SURFACES causes
array overflow when there are more than 3 planes.
[how]
Use the MAX_PLANES for the mpc_combine array size.Show less |
Apfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleCRTMath::add(double[], double[]). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe ther...Show moreApfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleCRTMath::add(double[], double[]). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: Don't ignore suspended array in md_check_recovery()
mddev_suspend() never stop sync_thread, hence it doesn't make sense to
ignore suspended array...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: Don't ignore suspended array in md_check_recovery()
mddev_suspend() never stop sync_thread, hence it doesn't make sense to
ignore suspended array in md_check_recovery(), which might cause
sync_thread can't be unregistered.
After commit f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread"), following
hang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh:
1) suspend the array:
raid_postsuspend
mddev_suspend
2) stop the array:
raid_dtr
md_stop
__md_stop_writes
stop_sync_thread
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread);
wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery))
3) sync thread done:
md_do_sync
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery);
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
4) daemon thread can't unregister sync thread:
md_check_recovery
if (mddev->suspended)
return; -> return directly
md_read_sync_thread
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
-> MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can't be cleared, hence step 2 hang;
This problem is not just related to dm-raid, fix it by ignoring
suspended array in md_check_recovery(). And follow up patches will
improve dm-raid better to frozen sync thread during suspend.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: Don't suspend the array for interrupted reshape
md_start_sync() will suspend the array if there are spares that can be
added or removed from conf,...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: Don't suspend the array for interrupted reshape
md_start_sync() will suspend the array if there are spares that can be
added or removed from conf, however, if reshape is still in progress,
this won't happen at all or data will be corrupted(remove_and_add_spares
won't be called from md_choose_sync_action for reshape), hence there is
no need to suspend the array if reshape is not done yet.
Meanwhile, there is a potential deadlock for raid456:
1) reshape is interrupted;
2) set one of the disk WantReplacement, and add a new disk to the array,
however, recovery won't start until the reshape is finished;
3) then issue an IO across reshpae position, this IO will wait for
reshape to make progress;
4) continue to reshape, then md_start_sync() found there is a spare disk
that can be added to conf, mddev_suspend() is called;
Step 4 and step 3 is waiting for each other, deadlock triggered. Noted
this problem is found by code review, and it's not reporduced yet.
Fix this porblem by don't suspend the array for interrupted reshape,
this is safe because conf won't be changed until reshape is done.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Fix oob in ntfs_listxattr
The length of name cannot exceed the space occupied by ea. |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dcn35_clkmgr
[Why]
There is a potential memory access violation while
iterating through array of dcn...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dcn35_clkmgr
[Why]
There is a potential memory access violation while
iterating through array of dcn35 clks.
[How]
Limit iteration per array size.Show less |
A Improper Validation of Array Index issue affecting the v2_sdk_service running on a set of DJI drone devices on the port 10000 could allow an attacker to corrupt a controlled memory location due to a missing input valid...Show moreA Improper Validation of Array Index issue affecting the v2_sdk_service running on a set of DJI drone devices on the port 10000 could allow an attacker to corrupt a controlled memory location due to a missing input validation in the on_receive_session_packet_ack function implemented in the libv2_sdk.so library used by the dji_vtwo_sdk binary implementing the service, potentially leading to a memory information leak or to an arbitrary code execution. Affected models are Mavic 3 Pro until v01.01.0300, Mavic 3 until v01.00.1200, Mavic 3 Classic until v01.00.0500, Mavic 3 Enterprise until v07.01.10.03, Matrice 300 until v57.00.01.00, Matrice M30 until v07.01.0022 and Mini 3 Pro until v01.00.0620.Show less |
Information disclosure when VI calibration state set by ADSP is greater than MAX_FBSP_STATE in the response payload to AFE calibration command. |
Improper validation of array index vulnerability in UserPrivilege.Enum webapi component in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive informa...Show moreImproper validation of array index vulnerability in UserPrivilege.Enum webapi component in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks via unspecified vectors.Show less |
In Eclipse ThreadX before version 6.4.0, the _Mtxinit() function in the
Xtensa port was missing an array size check causing a memory overwrite.
The affected file was ports/xtensa/xcc/src/tx_clib_lock.c |
Remotely executed SEGV and out of bounds read allows malicious packet sender to crash or cause an out of bounds read via sending a malformed packet with the correct length.
|
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mt76: mt7921: fix possible AOOB issue in mt7921_mcu_tx_rate_report
Fix possible array out of bound access in mt7921_mcu_tx_rate_report.
Remove unneces...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mt76: mt7921: fix possible AOOB issue in mt7921_mcu_tx_rate_report
Fix possible array out of bound access in mt7921_mcu_tx_rate_report.
Remove unnecessary varibable in mt7921_mcu_tx_rate_reportShow less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
FS:JFS:UBSAN:array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Syzkaller reported the following issue:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:286...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
FS:JFS:UBSAN:array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Syzkaller reported the following issue:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2867:6
index 196694 is out of range for type 's8[1365]' (aka 'signed char[1365]')
CPU: 1 PID: 109 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/04/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348
dbAdjTree+0x474/0x4f0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2867
dbJoin+0x210/0x2d0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2834
dbFreeBits+0x4eb/0xda0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2331
dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2080 [inline]
dbFree+0x343/0x650 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:402
txFreeMap+0x798/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2534
txUpdateMap+0x342/0x9e0
txLazyCommit fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2664 [inline]
jfs_lazycommit+0x47a/0xb70 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2732
kthread+0x2d3/0x370 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x48/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
</TASK>
================================================================================
Kernel panic - not syncing: UBSAN: panic_on_warn set ...
CPU: 1 PID: 109 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/04/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
panic+0x30f/0x770 kernel/panic.c:340
check_panic_on_warn+0x82/0xa0 kernel/panic.c:236
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:223 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x13c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348
dbAdjTree+0x474/0x4f0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2867
dbJoin+0x210/0x2d0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2834
dbFreeBits+0x4eb/0xda0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2331
dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2080 [inline]
dbFree+0x343/0x650 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:402
txFreeMap+0x798/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2534
txUpdateMap+0x342/0x9e0
txLazyCommit fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2664 [inline]
jfs_lazycommit+0x47a/0xb70 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:2732
kthread+0x2d3/0x370 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x48/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
</TASK>
Kernel Offset: disabled
Rebooting in 86400 seconds..
The issue is caused when the value of lp becomes greater than
CTLTREESIZE which is the max size of stree. Adding a simple check
solves this issue.
Dave:
As the function returns a void, good error handling
would require a more intrusive code reorganization, so I modified
Osama's patch at use WARN_ON_ONCE for lack of a cleaner option.
The patch is tested via syzbot.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in dtSplitRoot
Syzkaller reported the following issue:
oop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
UBSAN: array-...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in dtSplitRoot
Syzkaller reported the following issue:
oop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c:1971:9
index -2 is out of range for type 'struct dtslot [128]'
CPU: 0 PID: 3613 Comm: syz-executor270 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-09423-g493ffd6605b2 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:151 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xdb/0x130 lib/ubsan.c:283
dtSplitRoot+0x8d8/0x1900 fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c:1971
dtSplitUp fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c:985 [inline]
dtInsert+0x1189/0x6b80 fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c:863
jfs_mkdir+0x757/0xb00 fs/jfs/namei.c:270
vfs_mkdir+0x3b3/0x590 fs/namei.c:4013
do_mkdirat+0x279/0x550 fs/namei.c:4038
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4053 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4051 [inline]
__x64_sys_mkdirat+0x85/0x90 fs/namei.c:4051
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fcdc0113fd9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffeb8bc67d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000102
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fcdc0113fd9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000340 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fcdc00d37a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fcdc00d37a0
R10: 00005555559a72c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000f8008000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00083878000000f8 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
The issue is caused when the value of fsi becomes less than -1.
The check to break the loop when fsi value becomes -1 is present
but syzbot was able to produce value less than -1 which cause the error.
This patch simply add the change for the values less than 0.
The patch is tested via syzbot.Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Currently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while
accessing the dmt_stree. To add the re...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbAdjTree
Currently there is a bound check missing in the dbAdjTree while
accessing the dmt_stree. To add the required check added the bool is_ctl
which is required to determine the size as suggest in the following
commit.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f9475918-2186-49b8-b801-6f0f9e75f4fa@oracle.com/Show less |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report]
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2
index -878706688 is out of ra...Show moreIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diNewExt
[Syz report]
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360:2
index -878706688 is out of range for type 'struct iagctl[128]'
CPU: 1 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor282 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00009-gbee0e7762ad2 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348
diNewExt+0x3cf3/0x4000 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2360
diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1949 [inline]
diAllocAG+0xbe8/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1666
diAlloc+0x1d3/0x1760 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1587
ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xb90 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
vfs_mkdir+0x2f1/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4106
do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4129
__do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4149 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4147 [inline]
__x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80 fs/namei.c:4147
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7fcb7e6a0b57
Code: ff ff 77 07 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd83023038 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000053
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fcb7e6a0b57
RDX: 00000000000a1020 RSI: 00000000000001ff RDI: 0000000020000140
RBP: 0000000020000140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 00007ffd830230d0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Analysis]
When the agstart is too large, it can cause agno overflow.
[Fix]
After obtaining agno, if the value is invalid, exit the subsequent process.
Modified the test from agno > MAXAG to agno >= MAXAG based on linux-next
report by kernel test robot (Dan Carpenter).Show less |