← Back
CWE-1021

400 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (400)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Ibm
1Websphere Application Server
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 30, 2019
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty Admin Center could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could send a spec...Show more
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty Admin Center could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could send a specially-crafted HTTP request to hijack the victim's click actions or launch other client-side browser attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 160513.Show less
1Pivotal Software
1Cloud Foundry Uaa
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 18, 2019
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Cloud Foundry UAA, versions prior to v73.4.0, does not set an X-FRAME-OPTIONS header on various endpoints. A remote user can perform clickjacking attacks on UAA's frontend sites.
1Mailvelope
1Mailvelope
Jun 17, 2026
Jul 9, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Mailvelope prior to 3.1.0 is vulnerable to a clickjacking attack against the settings page. As the settings page is intended to be accessible from web applications, the browser's extension isolation mechanisms are disabl...Show more
Mailvelope prior to 3.1.0 is vulnerable to a clickjacking attack against the settings page. As the settings page is intended to be accessible from web applications, the browser's extension isolation mechanisms are disabled (web_accessible_resources). Mailvelope implements additional measures to prevent web applications from directly embedding the settings page, but this mechanism can be bypassed.Show less
1Bcnquark
1Quarking Password Manager
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 24, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
BCN Quark Quarking Password Manager 3.1.84 suffers from a clickjacking vulnerability caused by allowing * within web_accessible_resources. An attacker can take advantage of this vulnerability and cause significant harm.
1Sap
1Netweaver Process Integration
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 12, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Java Server Pages (JSPs) provided by the SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (SAP_XIESR and SAP_XITOOL: 7.10 to 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50) do not restrict or incorrectly restrict frame objects or UI layers that be...Show more
Java Server Pages (JSPs) provided by the SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (SAP_XIESR and SAP_XITOOL: 7.10 to 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50) do not restrict or incorrectly restrict frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, resulting in Clickjacking vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability leads to unwanted modification of user's data.Show less
1Huawei
1Hg255s Firmware
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 10, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
There is a Clickjacking vulnerability in Huawei HG255s product. An attacker may trick user to click a link and affect the integrity of a device by exploiting this vulnerability.
1Ibm
1Security Information Queue
Jun 17, 2026
Jun 6, 2019
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could explo...Show more
IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 159226.Show less
1Ca
2Risk Authentication
Strong Authentication
Jun 17, 2026
May 28, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
A UI redress vulnerability in the administrative user interface of CA Technologies CA Strong Authentication 9.0.x, 8.2.x, 8.1.x, 8.0.x, 7.1.x and CA Risk Authentication 9.0.x, 8.2.x, 8.1.x, 8.0.x, 3.1.x may allow a remot...Show more
A UI redress vulnerability in the administrative user interface of CA Technologies CA Strong Authentication 9.0.x, 8.2.x, 8.1.x, 8.0.x, 7.1.x and CA Risk Authentication 9.0.x, 8.2.x, 8.1.x, 8.0.x, 3.1.x may allow a remote attacker to gain sensitive information in some cases.Show less
1Ibm
1Bigfix Platform
Jun 17, 2026
May 20, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.0 MEDIUM· v2
IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 could allow a low-privilege user to manipulate the UI into exposing interface elements and information normally restricted to administrators. IBM X-Force ID: 156570.
1Ibm
1Spectrum Protect Backup Archive Client
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 8, 2019
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (IBM Spectrum Protect 7.1 and 8.1) could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could explo...Show more
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (IBM Spectrum Protect 7.1 and 8.1) could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 151014.Show less
1Synology
1Sso Server
Nov 21, 2024
Apr 1, 2019
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames vulnerability in SSOOauth.cgi in Synology SSO Server before 2.1.3-0129 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors.
1Mozilla
1Firefox
Nov 21, 2024
Feb 28, 2019
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
When the RSS Feed preview about:feeds page is framed within another page, it can be used in concert with scripted content for a clickjacking attack that confuses users into downloading and executing an executable file fr...Show more
When the RSS Feed preview about:feeds page is framed within another page, it can be used in concert with scripted content for a clickjacking attack that confuses users into downloading and executing an executable file from a temporary directory. *Note: This issue only affects Windows operating systems. Other operating systems are not affected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 64.Show less
4Debian
FedoraprojectGoogle+1 more
6Chrome
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux Desktop+3 more
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 19, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Insufficient protection of permission UI in WebAPKs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed an attacker who convinced the user to install a malicious application to access privacy/security sensitive web...Show more
Insufficient protection of permission UI in WebAPKs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed an attacker who convinced the user to install a malicious application to access privacy/security sensitive web APIs via a crafted APK.Show less
1Cybozu
1Remote Service Manager
Nov 21, 2024
Jan 9, 2019
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
Improper countermeasure against clickjacking attack in client certificates management screen was discovered in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8, that allows remote attackers to trick a user to delete the registered c...Show more
Improper countermeasure against clickjacking attack in client certificates management screen was discovered in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8, that allows remote attackers to trick a user to delete the registered client certificate.Show less
3Debian
GoogleRedhat
5Chrome
Debian LinuxEnterprise Linux Desktop+2 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 9, 2019
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Eliding from the wrong side in an infobar in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 68.0.3440.75 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to Hide Chrome Security UI via a crafted Chrome Exten...Show more
Eliding from the wrong side in an infobar in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 68.0.3440.75 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to Hide Chrome Security UI via a crafted Chrome Extension.Show less
1Apache
1Nifi
Nov 21, 2024
Dec 19, 2018
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks....Show more
The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on the Apache NiFi 1.8.0 release. Users running a prior 1.x release should upgrade to the appropriate release.Show less
1Ibm
1Security Access Manager
Nov 21, 2024
Dec 13, 2018
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Security Access Manager Appliance 9.0.1.0, 9.0.2.0, 9.0.3.0, 9.0.4.0, and 9.0.5.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a rem...Show more
IBM Security Access Manager Appliance 9.0.1.0, 9.0.2.0, 9.0.3.0, 9.0.4.0, and 9.0.5.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 149702.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 14, 2018
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
6.9 MEDIUM· v2
In functionality implemented in System UI, there are insufficient protections implemented around overlay windows. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User inte...Show more
In functionality implemented in System UI, there are insufficient protections implemented around overlay windows. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android. Versions: Android-7.0 Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1. Android ID: A-34170870Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 6, 2018
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
In computeFocusedWindow of RootWindowContainer.java, and related functions, there is possible interception of keypresses due to focus being on the wrong window. This could lead to local escalation of privilege revealing...Show more
In computeFocusedWindow of RootWindowContainer.java, and related functions, there is possible interception of keypresses due to focus being on the wrong window. This could lead to local escalation of privilege revealing the user's keypresses while the screen was locked with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android Versions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android ID: A-71786287.Show less
1Rainmachine
1Rainmachine Web Application
Jun 17, 2026
Nov 1, 2018
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
A missing X-Frame-Options header in the Green Electronics RainMachine Mini-8 (2nd Generation) and Touch HD 12 web application could be used by a remote attacker for clickjacking, as demonstrated by triggering an API page...Show more
A missing X-Frame-Options header in the Green Electronics RainMachine Mini-8 (2nd Generation) and Touch HD 12 web application could be used by a remote attacker for clickjacking, as demonstrated by triggering an API page request.Show less