← Back
CWE-1021

400 CVEs • Abstraction: Base

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with.

JSON object

Loading...

CVEs (400)

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate of UsbConfirmActivity, there is a possible tapjacking vector due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is neede...Show more
In onCreate of UsbConfirmActivity, there is a possible tapjacking vector due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-173421110Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Mar 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate() of ChooseTypeAndAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to learn the existence of an account, without permissions, due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege...Show more
In onCreate() of ChooseTypeAndAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to learn the existence of an account, without permissions, due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-172841550Show less
1Mozilla
1Firefox
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 26, 2021
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
The browser could have been confused into transferring a pointer lock state into another tab, which could have lead to clickjacking attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 85.
1Mozilla
1Firefox
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 26, 2021
N/A· v4
8.1 HIGH· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
When accepting a malicious intent from other installed apps, Firefox for Android accepted manifests from arbitrary file paths and allowed declaring webapp manifests for other origins. This could be used to gain fullscree...Show more
When accepting a malicious intent from other installed apps, Firefox for Android accepted manifests from arbitrary file paths and allowed declaring webapp manifests for other origins. This could be used to gain fullscreen access for UI spoofing and could also lead to cross-origin attacks on targeted websites. Note: This issue is a different issue from CVE-2020-26954 and only affected Firefox for Android. Other operating systems are unaffected. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 86.Show less
1Containous
1Traefik
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 18, 2021
N/A· v4
5.3 MEDIUM· v3
5.0 MEDIUM· v2
Traefik before 2.4.5 allows the loading of IFRAME elements from other domains.
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
6.9 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate of BluetoothPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a tapjacking overlay that obscures the phonebook permissions dialog when a Bluetooth device is connecting. This could lead to...Show more
In onCreate of BluetoothPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a tapjacking overlay that obscures the phonebook permissions dialog when a Bluetooth device is connecting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10 Android-11Android ID: A-168504491Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
6.9 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible overlay attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and notification access with User executio...Show more
In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible overlay attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and notification access with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1Android ID: A-170731783Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
6.9 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate of UninstallerActivity, there is a possible way to uninstall an all without informed user consent due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privi...Show more
In onCreate of UninstallerActivity, there is a possible way to uninstall an all without informed user consent due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1 Android-9Android ID: A-171221302Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
In PackageInstaller, there is a possible tapjacking attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and permissions with no additional execution privileges needed. User interacti...Show more
In PackageInstaller, there is a possible tapjacking attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and permissions with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-154015447Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 10, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
9.3 HIGH· v2
In PackageInstaller, there is a possible tapjacking attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and permissions with no additional execution privileges needed. User interacti...Show more
In PackageInstaller, there is a possible tapjacking attack due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and permissions with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-155287782Show less
1Sap
1Businessobjects Business Intelligence
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2021
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
5.8 MEDIUM· v2
SAP Business Objects BI Platform, versions - 410, 420, 430, allows multiple X-Frame-Options headers entries in the response headers, which may not be predictably treated by all user agents. This could, as a result, nulli...Show more
SAP Business Objects BI Platform, versions - 410, 420, 430, allows multiple X-Frame-Options headers entries in the response headers, which may not be predictably treated by all user agents. This could, as a result, nullify the added X-Frame-Options header leading to Clickjacking attack.Show less
2Google
Microsoft
2Chrome
Edge Chromium
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2021
N/A· v4
6.5 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Inappropriate implementation in iframe sandbox in Google Chrome prior to 88.0.4324.96 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page.
2Google
Microsoft
2Chrome
Edge Chromium
Jun 17, 2026
Feb 9, 2021
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 88.0.4324.96 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Extension.
1Ibm
11Collaborative Lifecycle Management
Engineering InsightsEngineering Lifecycle Management+8 more
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 27, 2021
N/A· v4
5.4 MEDIUM· v3
3.5 LOW· v2
IBM Jazz Foundation products could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack t...Show more
IBM Jazz Foundation products could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 183315.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2021
N/A· v4
7.3 HIGH· v3
4.4 MEDIUM· v2
In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to convince the user to grant an app access to an account due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privile...Show more
In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to convince the user to grant an app access to an account due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-8.1, Android-9, Android-10, Android-11, Android-8.0; Android ID: A-169763814.Show less
1Google
1Android
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 11, 2021
N/A· v4
7.8 HIGH· v3
4.4 MEDIUM· v2
In onAuthenticated of AuthenticationClient.java, there is a possible tapjacking attack when requesting the user's fingerprint due to an overlaid window. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional...Show more
In onAuthenticated of AuthenticationClient.java, there is a possible tapjacking attack when requesting the user's fingerprint due to an overlaid window. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-8.0, Android-8.1, Android-9, Android-10, 11; Android ID: A-159249069.Show less
3Debian
FedoraprojectGoogle
3Chrome
Debian LinuxFedora
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2021
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
6.8 MEDIUM· v2
Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUI in Google Chrome prior to 87.0.4280.141 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Exte...Show more
Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUI in Google Chrome prior to 87.0.4280.141 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Extension.Show less
1Ibm
1Spectrum Protect Plus
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2021
N/A· v4
6.1 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulner...Show more
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 193656.Show less
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2021
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Inappropriate implementation in WebUSB in Google Chrome prior to 87.0.4280.66 allowed a remote attacker to spoof security UI via a crafted HTML page.
1Google
1Chrome
Jun 17, 2026
Jan 8, 2021
N/A· v4
4.3 MEDIUM· v3
4.3 MEDIUM· v2
Insufficient data validation in sharing in Google Chrome prior to 87.0.4280.66 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page.