CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jul 30, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jul 23, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1862. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1862 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1862. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 26, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Mar 5, 2018
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jul 5, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jun 30, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2608. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2608 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2608. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Aug 13, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 18, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Oct 29, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users sho...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Apr 1, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jan 30, 2018
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 11, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Aug 13, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 26, 2017
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Apr 8, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usageShow less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
May 22, 2009
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was doc...Show more
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion.Show less
-
-
Nov 7, 2023
Jun 11, 2021
N/A· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2009. Notes: none