Clear
More filters
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.
Type at least 2 characters, then select a match.

Dates include the whole day in UTC. All selected filters apply together.

CVE
VENDORS
PRODUCTS
UPDATED
PUBLISHED
CVSS
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
5.3 MEDIUM· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
An incomplete list of disallowed inputs in the Python code validator of the run_script tool in AWS MCP Server might allow an authenticated remote user to execute arbitrary code within their own isolated session environme...Show more
An incomplete list of disallowed inputs in the Python code validator of the run_script tool in AWS MCP Server might allow an authenticated remote user to execute arbitrary code within their own isolated session environment via a crafted script. AWS fixed this issue service-side. No customer action is required.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
5.8 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Server-side request forgery in the model download path in Amazon Web Services Multi Model Server 1.1.11 and earlier might allow remote actors to send requests to internal network destinations via a crafted model URL....Show more
Server-side request forgery in the model download path in Amazon Web Services Multi Model Server 1.1.11 and earlier might allow remote actors to send requests to internal network destinations via a crafted model URL. Multi Model Server is end of life and no fixed version is available. Users should discontinue use of Multi Model Server and migrate to a supported model serving solution.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Relative path traversal during model archive extraction in Amazon Web Services Multi Model Server 1.1.11 and earlier might allow remote actors to execute arbitrary code via a crafted model archive. Multi Model Server...Show more
Relative path traversal during model archive extraction in Amazon Web Services Multi Model Server 1.1.11 and earlier might allow remote actors to execute arbitrary code via a crafted model archive. Multi Model Server is end of life and no fixed version is available. Users should discontinue use of Multi Model Server and migrate to a supported model serving solution.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
N/A· v4
7.4 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the client connected to, when the host is a non-canonical IPv4 literal with a leading...Show more
A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the client connected to, when the host is a non-canonical IPv4 literal with a leading zero, such as `0127.0.0.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` normalizes the host following the WHATWG URL rules, which read a leading-zero octet as octal (`0127.0.0.1` becomes `87.0.0.1`), while the connection is made through the operating system resolver, which on some platforms such as macOS reads it as decimal (`127.0.0.1`). A server at the connected address can then be authenticated with a certificate issued for another IP address. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.Show less
2Gitlab
Ruby Lang
2Gitlab
Ruby
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 13, 2026
N/A· v4
10.0 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 19.2 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an unauthenticated user to exec...Show more
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 19.2 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the GitLab server via a specially crafted regular expression in a CI/CD configuration, due to insufficient regular expression validation.Show less
1Apache
1Fineract
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
This issue affects Apache Fineract versions up to and including 1.15.0. The Center read endpoint (GET /api/v1/centers) and the datatable entry read endpoints (GET /api/v1/datatables/{datatable}/{apptableId} and GET /api/...Show more
This issue affects Apache Fineract versions up to and including 1.15.0. The Center read endpoint (GET /api/v1/centers) and the datatable entry read endpoints (GET /api/v1/datatables/{datatable}/{apptableId} and GET /api/v1/datatables/{datatable}/{apptableId}/{datatableId}) concatenate caller-supplied ordering parameters (orderBy, sortOrder, order) directly into the SQL ORDER BY clause. The existing regex-based input validation can be bypassed, allowing time-based blind SQL injection by any authenticated user with read access to centers or to the targeted datatable. Users are recommended to upgrade to 1.16.1 which fixes the issue.Show less
1Apache
1Fineract
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ("SQL Injection") vulnerability exists in Apache Fineract (through version 1.15.0). The vulnerability affects the outStandingAmountPercentageCondition pa...Show more
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ("SQL Injection") vulnerability exists in Apache Fineract (through version 1.15.0). The vulnerability affects the outStandingAmountPercentageCondition parameter of the /fineract-provider/api/v1/search/advance HTTP API endpoint, allowing SQL injection due to insufficient input neutralization. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.16.1, which will fix the issue.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Sep 27, 2026
N/A· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The OCI delta stream parser read sizes as guint64 but passed them to GLib I/O and allocation functions expecting gsize (32 bits on 32-bit systems), causing undersized allocations while subsequent operations use the origi...Show more
The OCI delta stream parser read sizes as guint64 but passed them to GLib I/O and allocation functions expecting gsize (32 bits on 32-bit systems), causing undersized allocations while subsequent operations use the original 64-bit size, leading to heap buffer overflows. An attacker controlling an OCI registry can craft a delta stream that triggers this during flatpak install/update, potentially achieving code execution on 32-bit systems.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
N/A· v4
8.8 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A malicious or compromised Flatpak repository can write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations on the host filesystem via extract_extra_data(). On system installs, the write happens as root. Two issues combin...Show more
A malicious or compromised Flatpak repository can write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations on the host filesystem via extract_extra_data(). On system installs, the write happens as root. Two issues combine: `files/extra` is resolved via path operations that follow symlinks, and blob names from `xa.extra-data-sources` are not sanitized against `..` traversal.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
7.1 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Missing authorization in the unit resources download route in Canonical Juju 4.0 through 4.0.15 allows a controller-authenticated principal (a unit agent, or a user with only login permission) to read any application's c...Show more
Missing authorization in the unit resources download route in Canonical Juju 4.0 through 4.0.15 allows a controller-authenticated principal (a unit agent, or a user with only login permission) to read any application's charm resource in any model,  including container-registry credentials, via a crafted request naming an arbitrary unit.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
7.5 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
The authentication framework used by affected Kiloview E3 NDI encoder firmware signs session JSON Web Tokens using an HMAC-SHA256 secret hardcoded as a static string within the firmware image, identical across all deploy...Show more
The authentication framework used by affected Kiloview E3 NDI encoder firmware signs session JSON Web Tokens using an HMAC-SHA256 secret hardcoded as a static string within the firmware image, identical across all deployed devices. An attacker with access to the publicly distributed firmware can recover this secret and forge arbitrary session tokens, including administrative tokens, without valid credentials, enabling unauthenticated access to privileged device functions.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
`JwtClaims.MarshalJSON` built a Go struct at runtime with `reflect.StructOf`, synthesising a field named `"A" + claimName` for each untyped claim. `reflect.StructOf` **panics** when a field name is not a valid Go identif...Show more
`JwtClaims.MarshalJSON` built a Go struct at runtime with `reflect.StructOf`, synthesising a field named `"A" + claimName` for each untyped claim. `reflect.StructOf` **panics** when a field name is not a valid Go identifier, or when it duplicates another field. Both conditions are reachable from ordinary JWT claim names.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
`jwkFields.CheckConsistency` detected duplicate `key_ops` entries with a pairwise nested loop, making validation cost grow with the **square** of the entry count. Because the check runs on every JWK and JWKS unmarshal, a...Show more
`jwkFields.CheckConsistency` detected duplicate `key_ops` entries with a pairwise nested loop, making validation cost grow with the **square** of the entry count. Because the check runs on every JWK and JWKS unmarshal, a modestly sized but hostile JWKS document could occupy a CPU core for many seconds.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
`JwksTrustStore.Get` assigned each parsed key to the function's **named return value** while refreshing the JWKS cache. When the requested `kid` was not present, the trailing naked `return` handed the caller the last key...Show more
`JwksTrustStore.Get` assigned each parsed key to the function's **named return value** while refreshing the JWKS cache. When the requested `kid` was not present, the trailing naked `return` handed the caller the last key in the JWKS document together with a `nil` error — a confidently wrong answer instead of "not found".Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
6.9 MEDIUM· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
`AesGcmCryptor.Open` passed a caller-supplied nonce straight to `cipher.AEAD.Open` without checking its length. The Go standard library **panics** rather than returning an error when a GCM nonce is not exactly `NonceSize...Show more
`AesGcmCryptor.Open` passed a caller-supplied nonce straight to `cipher.AEAD.Open` without checking its length. The Go standard library **panics** rather than returning an error when a GCM nonce is not exactly `NonceSize()` bytes, so a JWE carrying a wrong-sized IV crashes the decrypting goroutine.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the command line interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to...Show more
A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the command line interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by AOS-10.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
An authentication bypass vulnerability in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gai...Show more
An authentication bypass vulnerability in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative access, modify system configurations, access or manipulate sensitive data, and disrupt network operations.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
N/A· v4
9.6 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker t...Show more
Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
N/A· v4
9.8 CRITICAL· v3
N/A· v2
Sensitive information disclosure vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the affected system. Successful exploitation could...Show more
Sensitive information disclosure vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
ast-cli downloads two helper binaries, the Vorpal ASCA real-time engine and the SCA Resolver, from "download.checkmarx.com" as part of its auto-update flow, triggered by the Checkmarx’s "VSCode/JetBrains" extensions and...Show more
ast-cli downloads two helper binaries, the Vorpal ASCA real-time engine and the SCA Resolver, from "download.checkmarx.com" as part of its auto-update flow, triggered by the Checkmarx’s "VSCode/JetBrains" extensions and by cx scan "sca-realtime". Prior to the fix, the downloaded archive was not verified against a checksum before extraction and execution. An attacker able to substitute the served archive could deliver an arbitrary binary that ast-cli would extract and execute the contents of the archive, since no integrity check was performed on the download. Successful exploitation requires compromising "download.checkmarx.com" and replacing the served archive with one containing an attacker-controlled binary. If the served archive had been replaced that way, any developer machine or CI pipeline invoking ASCA (via Checkmarx's VSCode/JetBrains extensions) or cx scan "sca-realtime" on an affected version would have extracted and executed that binary in place of the intended download. The download is now verified against a published SHA-256 checksum before extraction.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
6.3 MEDIUM· v4
6.4 MEDIUM· v3
N/A· v2
Incomplete validation of extracted archive entry paths in ast-cli's tar extraction logic on Linux and macOS (used when installing the Vorpal ASCA real-time engine and the SCA Resolver) would allow a malicious tar archive...Show more
Incomplete validation of extracted archive entry paths in ast-cli's tar extraction logic on Linux and macOS (used when installing the Vorpal ASCA real-time engine and the SCA Resolver) would allow a malicious tar archive containing absolute or traversal path entries to write files outside the install directory. Windows builds were not affected, as the Windows extractor performs this path validation. Exploitation required substituting the archive served at "download.checkmarx.com". An attacker able to compromise that server and replace the archive could write arbitrary, executable files to arbitrary filesystem paths via this path traversal. Extraction now validates that each entry's destination path resolves within the working directory and rejects absolute paths.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Sep 8, 2026
N/A· v4
7.2 HIGH· v3
N/A· v2
A flaw was found in Dogtag PKI, as used by FreeIPA's certificate authority component. The certificate profile import functionality does not fully validate uploaded profile content beyond the profile ID. An authenticated...Show more
A flaw was found in Dogtag PKI, as used by FreeIPA's certificate authority component. The certificate profile import functionality does not fully validate uploaded profile content beyond the profile ID. An authenticated user with CA Administrator privileges can exploit Dogtag's ExternalProcessConstraint mechanism to execute arbitrary commands with attacker-controlled environment variables, achieving code execution as the pkiuser account.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
8.7 HIGH· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the unauthenticated form service in version 11.0.14 in onPhase Forms allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal Apache Solr data via an at...Show more
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the unauthenticated form service in version 11.0.14 in onPhase Forms allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal Apache Solr data via an attacker-controlled URL supplied to a publicly accessible form.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 23, 2026
9.3 CRITICAL· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
An authentication bypass vulnerability in the public onPhase/ frevvo registration form version 11.0.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to authenticate as an arbitrary tenant user, obtain TenantAdmin and Designe...Show more
An authentication bypass vulnerability in the public onPhase/ frevvo registration form version 11.0.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to authenticate as an arbitrary tenant user, obtain TenantAdmin and Designer privileges, and execute arbitrary operating system commands via manipulation of registration parameters containing a valid tenant name and existing user identifier.Show less
-
-
Nov 2, 2026
Oct 22, 2026
2.1 LOW· v4
N/A· v3
N/A· v2
Missing security attributes on sensitive cookies in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise user sessions if other security issues such as a cross-site scripting vu...Show more
Missing security attributes on sensitive cookies in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise user sessions if other security issues such as a cross-site scripting vulnerability or a man-in-the-middle attack are present. A workaround is not possible.Show less